Jonathan M Davis1,2,3, Jeffrey Shenberger4, Norma Terrin2,3, Janis L Breeze2,3, Mark Hudak5, Elisha M Wachman6, Peter Marro7, Erica L Oliveira8, Karen Harvey-Wilkes1, Adam Czynski8, Barbara Engelhardt9, Karen D'Apolito10, Debra Bogen11, Barry Lester8. 1. Department of Pediatrics, The Floating Hospital for Children at Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. The Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts. 5. Department of Pediatrics, Jacksonville-University of Florida Health, Jacksonville. 6. Department of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. 7. Department of Pediatrics, Maine Medical Center, Portland. 8. Department of Pediatrics, Women and Infant's Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island. 9. Department of Pediatrics, Monroe Carell Jr Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee. 10. Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, Tennessee. 11. Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
Importance: Although opioids are used to treat neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS), the best pharmacologic treatment has not been established. Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of methadone and morphine in NAS. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this randomized, double-blind, intention-to-treat trial, term infants from 8 US newborn units whose mothers received buprenorphine, methadone, or opioids for pain control during pregnancy were eligible. A total of 117 infants were randomized to receive methadone or morphine from February 9, 2014, to March 6, 2017. Mothers who declined randomization could consent to data collection and standard institutional treatment. Interventions: Infants were assessed with the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System every 4 hours and treated with methadone or placebo every 4 hours or morphine every 4 hours. Infants with persistently elevated Finnegan scores received dose increases. Infants who exceeded a predetermined opioid dose received phenobarbital. Dose reductions occurred every 12 to 48 hours when signs of NAS were controlled with therapy, stopping at 20% of the original dose. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was length of hospital stay (LOS). The secondary end points were LOS attributable to NAS and length of drug treatment (LOT). Results: A total of 183 mothers consented to have their infants in the study; 117 infants required treatment. Because 1 parent withdrew consent, data were analyzed on 116 infants (mean [SD] gestational age, 39.1 [1.1] weeks; mean [SD] birth weight, 3157 [486] g; 58 [50%] male). Demographic variables and risk factors were similar except for more prenatal cigarette exposure in infants who received methadone. Adjusting for study site and maternal opioid type, methadone was associated with decreased mean number of days for LOS by 14% (relative number of days, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.74-1.00; P = .046), corresponding to a difference of 2.9 days; 14% reduction in LOS attributable to NAS (relative number of days, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77-0.96; P = .01), corresponding to a difference of 2.7 days; and 16% reduction in LOT (relative number of days, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73-0.97; P = .02), corresponding to a difference of 2.3 days. Methadone was also associated with reduced median LOS (16 vs 20 days, P = .005), LOS attributable to NAS (16 vs 19 days, P = .005), and LOT (11.5 vs 15 days, P = .009). Study infants had better short-term outcomes than 170 nonrandomized infants treated withmorphine per standard institutional protocols. Conclusions and Relevance: With use of weight- and sign-based treatment for NAS, short-term outcomes were better in infants receiving methadone compared with morphine. Assessment of longer-term outcomes is ongoing. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01958476.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Although opioids are used to treat neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS), the best pharmacologic treatment has not been established. Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of methadone and morphine in NAS. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this randomized, double-blind, intention-to-treat trial, term infants from 8 US newborn units whose mothers received buprenorphine, methadone, or opioids for pain control during pregnancy were eligible. A total of 117 infants were randomized to receive methadone or morphine from February 9, 2014, to March 6, 2017. Mothers who declined randomization could consent to data collection and standard institutional treatment. Interventions: Infants were assessed with the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System every 4 hours and treated with methadone or placebo every 4 hours or morphine every 4 hours. Infants with persistently elevated Finnegan scores received dose increases. Infants who exceeded a predetermined opioid dose received phenobarbital. Dose reductions occurred every 12 to 48 hours when signs of NAS were controlled with therapy, stopping at 20% of the original dose. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was length of hospital stay (LOS). The secondary end points were LOS attributable to NAS and length of drug treatment (LOT). Results: A total of 183 mothers consented to have their infants in the study; 117 infants required treatment. Because 1 parent withdrew consent, data were analyzed on 116 infants (mean [SD] gestational age, 39.1 [1.1] weeks; mean [SD] birth weight, 3157 [486] g; 58 [50%] male). Demographic variables and risk factors were similar except for more prenatal cigarette exposure in infants who received methadone. Adjusting for study site and maternal opioid type, methadone was associated with decreased mean number of days for LOS by 14% (relative number of days, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.74-1.00; P = .046), corresponding to a difference of 2.9 days; 14% reduction in LOS attributable to NAS (relative number of days, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77-0.96; P = .01), corresponding to a difference of 2.7 days; and 16% reduction in LOT (relative number of days, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73-0.97; P = .02), corresponding to a difference of 2.3 days. Methadone was also associated with reduced median LOS (16 vs 20 days, P = .005), LOS attributable to NAS (16 vs 19 days, P = .005), and LOT (11.5 vs 15 days, P = .009). Study infants had better short-term outcomes than 170 nonrandomized infants treated with morphine per standard institutional protocols. Conclusions and Relevance: With use of weight- and sign-based treatment for NAS, short-term outcomes were better in infants receiving methadone compared with morphine. Assessment of longer-term outcomes is ongoing. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01958476.
Authors: Walter K Kraft; Susan C Adeniyi-Jones; Inna Chervoneva; Jay S Greenspan; Diane Abatemarco; Karol Kaltenbach; Michelle E Ehrlich Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-05-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Hendrée E Jones; Karol Kaltenbach; Sarah H Heil; Susan M Stine; Mara G Coyle; Amelia M Arria; Kevin E O'Grady; Peter Selby; Peter R Martin; Gabriele Fischer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-12-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Robert M Ward; David R Drover; Gregory B Hammer; Christopher J Stemland; Steve Kern; Martin Tristani-Firouzi; Ralph A Lugo; Kristin Satterfield; Brian J Anderson Journal: Paediatr Anaesth Date: 2014-03-26 Impact factor: 2.556
Authors: Lorrene A Buckley; Smita Salunke; Karen Thompson; Gerri Baer; Darren Fegley; Mark A Turner Journal: Int J Pharm Date: 2017-07-17 Impact factor: 5.875
Authors: Adam J Czynski; Jonathan M Davis; Lynne M Dansereau; Barbara Engelhardt; Peter Marro; Debra L Bogen; Mark L Hudak; Jeffrey Shenberger; Elisha M Wachman; Erica L Oliveira; Barry M Lester Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2020-01-24 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Leslie W Young; Songthip Ounpraseuth; Stephanie L Merhar; Alan E Simon; Abhik Das; Rachel G Greenberg; Rosemary D Higgins; Jeannette Lee; Brenda B Poindexter; P Brian Smith; Michele Walsh; Jessica Snowden; Lori A Devlin Journal: Trials Date: 2022-08-09 Impact factor: 2.728
Authors: Tess Flannery; Jonathan M Davis; Adam J Czynski; Lynne M Dansereau; Erica L Oliveira; Samantha A Camardo; Barry M Lester Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2020-08-14 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Kathleen M Doherty; Theresa A Scott; Anna Morad; Travis Crook; Elizabeth McNeer; Kim S Lovell; James C Gay; Stephen W Patrick Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2020-12-02 Impact factor: 7.124