Literature DB >> 29912610

Pain and Surgical Outcomes Reporting After Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair in Relation to Mesh Fixation Technique: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Mooyad A Ahmed1,2, Qutaiba A Tawfic3, Christopher M Schlachta1,2, Nawar A Alkhamesi1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this meta-analysis was to examine postoperative pain and surgical outcomes (operative time, hospital stay, the incidence of seroma and recurrence) with different mesh fixation methods following laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR).
METHODS: Randomized clinical trials compared different methods of mesh fixation in LVHR and reported on pain outcome measures analyzed. The results were expressed as odds ratio (OR) for combined dichotomous and mean difference (MD) for continuous data.
RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 466 patients comparing tack mesh fixation to suture mesh fixation technique in LVHR were identified, all were published after 2005. A meta-analysis gave statistically similar odds of postoperative chronic pain (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.65-2.38; z = 0.65; P = .51). No difference in pain intensity (PI) scores was found at 4-6 weeks (MD, 0.18;% CI, -0.48 to 0.85; z = 0.54; P = .59) and at 3-6 months postoperatively (MD, 0.10; 95% CI, -0.21 to 0.42; z = 0.64; P = .52). There was no difference in the pooled analysis of seroma/hematoma formation (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.29-1.26; z = 1.35; P = .18), recurrence (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.34-3.62; z = 0.18; P = .86), and hospital stay (MD, -0.06; 95% CI, -0.19 to 0.08; z = 0.83; P = .40). Operative time was significantly lower with tack fixation (MD, -19.25; 95% CI, -27.98 to -10.51; z = 4.32; P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analysis of RCTs comparing tacks to suture fixation in LVHR showed comparable results with regard to postoperative chronic pain incidence and PI, and hernia recurrence. However, the operative time is shorter with tacks compared to suture fixation technique.

Entities:  

Keywords:  incisional hernia; laparoscopy; mesh fixation; umbilical hernia; ventral hernia

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29912610     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2017.0609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  6 in total

Review 1.  Primary non-complicated midline ventral hernia: is laparoscopic IPOM still a reasonable approach?

Authors:  S Van Hoef; T Tollens
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Safety and efficacy of absorbable and non-absorbable fixation systems for intraperitoneal mesh fixation: an experimental study in swine.

Authors:  S Kapoulas; A Papalois; G Papadakis; G Tsoulfas; E Christoforidis; B Papaziogas; D Schizas; G Chatzimavroudis
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Oscar A Olavarria; Karla Bernardi; Shinil K Shah; Todd D Wilson; Shuyan Wei; Claudia Pedroza; Elenir B Avritscher; Michele M Loor; Tien C Ko; Lillian S Kao; Mike K Liang
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-07-14

4.  Evaluation of Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Repair.

Authors:  Swati Jain; Sumit Kalra; Bimla Sharma; Chand Sahai; Jayashree Sood
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar

Review 5.  An Evaluation of the Evidence Guiding Adult Midline Ventral Hernia Repair.

Authors:  Alex Sagar; Niteen Tapuria
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2022-08-02

6.  Biomechanical Parameters of Mesh Reinforcement and Analysis of a Novel Device for Incisional Hernia Prevention.

Authors:  Charles A Messa; Jonathan Sanchez; Geoffrey M Kozak; Snehal Shetye; Ashley Rodriguez; John P Fischer
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 2.192

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.