Literature DB >> 29912356

Effects of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product in receiving diets of newly weaned beef steers. II. Digestibility and response to a vaccination challenge1.

Erin L Deters1, Rebecca S Stokes1, Olivia N Genther-Schroeder1, Stephanie L Hansen1.   

Abstract

Thirty-six newly weaned, crossbred beef steers (323 ± 12 kg; SD) from a single-source were used in a 56-d study to examine the effects of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product (SCFP; Original XPC, Diamond V, Cedar Rapids, IA) on total tract nutrient digestibility and response to a vaccination challenge. Twelve days after arrival, steers were blocked by body weight (BW) and randomly assigned to treatments: SCFP at 0 (CON), 14 (SCFP14), or 28 (SCFP28) g·steer-1·d-1. Steers were fed via bunks that measured individual intake and received ear tags (CowManager, Select Sires, Plain City, OH) that recorded rumination and activity. BWs were collected on days 1, 0, 14, 28, 42, 55, and 56. Titanium dioxide was fed as an indigestible marker to all steers from days 12 to 27, followed by consecutive day fecal samples, for determination of total tract nutrient digestibility. On day 34, steers received a Mannheimia haemolytica vaccination (One Shot, Zoetis, Kalamazoo, MI) to induce an acute phase protein response. Blood was collected from all steers on day 34 (prior to vaccination) and 3, 6, 9, 11, and 14 d post-vaccination. Data were analyzed using Proc Mixed of SAS (experimental unit = steer; n = 12 per treatment); the model included the fixed effect of treatment and block and the random effect of steer. Blood measures, ear tag, and dry matter intake (DMI) data for the 15-d vaccination period were analyzed as repeated measures. Contrast statements (CON vs. SCFP14; SCFP14 vs. SCFP28) were used to compare treatment means. Digestibility of dry matter (DM) and organic matter was greater for SCFP14 vs. SCFP28 (P ≤ 0.03). Steers fed SCFP14 exhibited greater crude protein digestibility compared with CON (P < 0.01). Steers fed SCFP14 exhibited greater DMI for 15 d post-vaccination (P = 0.02) and greater average daily gain from days 28 to 56 (P = 0.05) vs. SCFP28-fed steers. Post-vaccination, steers fed SCFP14 spent less time ruminating per kg of DM, neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and physically effective NDF consumed than CON or SCFP28 (P ≤ 0.07). Serum IL-8 and haptoglobin concentrations tended to be lesser for steers fed SCFP14 vs. SCFP28 (P ≤ 0.08). Ceruloplasmin concentrations were lesser on day 14 post-vaccination for steers fed SCFP14 vs. CON or SCFP28 (treatment × d; P = 0.004); there were no differences on other sampling days due to treatment. Although no overall performance benefit was noted, steers fed SCFP14 responded better to a vaccination challenge vs. SCFP28-fed steers.
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990 Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product; newly weaned beef cattle; vaccination challenge

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29912356      PMCID: PMC6127824          DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  22 in total

1.  Technical note: Accuracy of an ear tag-attached accelerometer to monitor rumination and feeding behavior in feedlot cattle.

Authors:  B Wolfger; E Timsit; E A Pajor; N Cook; H W Barkema; K Orsel
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Relationship between antioxidant capacity, oxidative stress, and feed efficiency in beef steers.

Authors:  J R Russell; W J Sexten; M S Kerley; S L Hansen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 3.  Bovine and canine acute phase proteins.

Authors:  P D Eckersall; J G Conner
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 4.  The respiratory burst of phagocytes.

Authors:  B M Babior
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Influence of yeast culture on feeder calves and lambs.

Authors:  N A Cole; C W Purdy; D P Hutcheson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Aspergillus oryzae cultures on ruminal fermentation in dairy cows.

Authors:  I K Yoon; M D Stern
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.034

7.  Relationships between rumination time, metabolic conditions, and health status in dairy cows during the transition period.

Authors:  N Soriani; E Trevisi; L Calamari
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Effect of yeast culture and Aspergillus oryzae fermentation extract on ruminal characteristics and nutrient digestibility.

Authors:  R D Wiedmeier; M J Arambel; J L Walters
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.034

9.  Influence of feed efficiency classification on diet digestibility and growth performance of beef steers.

Authors:  J R Russell; N O Minton; W J Sexten; M S Kerley; S L Hansen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 10.  Mitochondria and reactive oxygen species.

Authors:  Alicia J Kowaltowski; Nadja C de Souza-Pinto; Roger F Castilho; Anibal E Vercesi
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 7.376

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effects of a multicomponent microbial feed additive containing prebiotics and probiotics on health, immune status, metabolism, and performance of newly weaned beef steers during a 35-d receiving period.

Authors:  Modoluwamu D Idowu; Godstime Taiwo; Andres Pech Cervantes; Scott A Bowdridge; Ibukun M Ogunade
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-05-03

2.  Bioconversion of agro-industrial residues as a protein source supplementation for multiparous Holstein Thai crossbreed cows.

Authors:  Chaichana Suriyapha; Chanadol Supapong; Sarong So; Metha Wanapat; Anusorn Cherdthong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.752

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.