Janice Hu1,2, Pascal Geldsetzer2, Sarah Jane Steele3, Philippa Matthews4, Katrina Ortblad2, Tsion Solomon3, Amir Shroufi3, Gilles van Cutsem5,6, Frank Tanser4,7, Sally Wyke4,8, Sebastian Vollmer2,9, Deenan Pillay4,10, Margaret McConnell2, Till Bärnighausen2,4,11. 1. School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. 2. Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3. Médecins Sans Frontières, eShowe. 4. Africa Health Research Institute, Mtubatuba, KwaZulu-Natal. 5. Southern African Medical Unit, Médecins Sans Frontières, Cape Town. 6. Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, University of Cape Town. 7. School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. 8. Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. 9. Department of Economics & Centre for Modern Indian Studies, University of Goettingen, Göttingen, Germany. 10. Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK. 11. Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the causal effect of the number of lay counselors removed from a primary care clinic in rural South Africa on the number of clinic-based HIV tests performed. DESIGN: Fixed-effects panel analysis. METHODS: We collected monthly data on the number of lay counselors employed and HIV tests performed at nine primary care clinics in rural KwaZulu-Natal from January 2014 to December 2015. Using clinic-level and month-level fixed-effects regressions, we exploited the fact that lay counselors were removed from clinics at two quasi-random time points by a redeployment policy. RESULTS: A total of 24 526 HIV tests were conducted over the study period. Twenty-one of 27 lay counselors were removed across the nine clinics in the two redeployment waves. A 10% reduction in the number of lay counselors at a clinic was associated with a 4.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8-7.0, P < 0.001] decrease in the number of HIV tests performed. In absolute terms, losing one lay counselor from a clinic was associated with a mean of 29.7 (95% CI 21.2-38.2, P < 0.001) fewer HIV tests carried out at the clinic per month. CONCLUSION: This study provides some evidence that lay counselors play an important role in the HIV response in rural South Africa. More broadly, this analysis adds some empirical support to plans to increase the involvement of lay health workers in the HIV response.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the causal effect of the number of lay counselors removed from a primary care clinic in rural South Africa on the number of clinic-based HIV tests performed. DESIGN: Fixed-effects panel analysis. METHODS: We collected monthly data on the number of lay counselors employed and HIV tests performed at nine primary care clinics in rural KwaZulu-Natal from January 2014 to December 2015. Using clinic-level and month-level fixed-effects regressions, we exploited the fact that lay counselors were removed from clinics at two quasi-random time points by a redeployment policy. RESULTS: A total of 24 526 HIV tests were conducted over the study period. Twenty-one of 27 lay counselors were removed across the nine clinics in the two redeployment waves. A 10% reduction in the number of lay counselors at a clinic was associated with a 4.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8-7.0, P < 0.001] decrease in the number of HIV tests performed. In absolute terms, losing one lay counselor from a clinic was associated with a mean of 29.7 (95% CI 21.2-38.2, P < 0.001) fewer HIV tests carried out at the clinic per month. CONCLUSION: This study provides some evidence that lay counselors play an important role in the HIV response in rural South Africa. More broadly, this analysis adds some empirical support to plans to increase the involvement of lay health workers in the HIV response.
Authors: Susan Allen; Jareen Meinzen-Derr; Michele Kautzman; Isaac Zulu; Stanley Trask; Ulgen Fideli; Rosemary Musonda; Francis Kasolo; Feng Gao; Alan Haworth Journal: AIDS Date: 2003-03-28 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Myron S Cohen; Ying Q Chen; Marybeth McCauley; Theresa Gamble; Mina C Hosseinipour; Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy; James G Hakim; Johnstone Kumwenda; Beatriz Grinsztejn; Jose H S Pilotto; Sheela V Godbole; Sanjay Mehendale; Suwat Chariyalertsak; Breno R Santos; Kenneth H Mayer; Irving F Hoffman; Susan H Eshleman; Estelle Piwowar-Manning; Lei Wang; Joseph Makhema; Lisa A Mills; Guy de Bruyn; Ian Sanne; Joseph Eron; Joel Gallant; Diane Havlir; Susan Swindells; Heather Ribaudo; Vanessa Elharrar; David Burns; Taha E Taha; Karin Nielsen-Saines; David Celentano; Max Essex; Thomas R Fleming Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-07-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Brent D Fulton; Richard M Scheffler; Susan P Sparkes; Erica Yoonkyung Auh; Marko Vujicic; Agnes Soucat Journal: Hum Resour Health Date: 2011-01-11
Authors: Ivy Mannoh; Danielle Amundsen; Gnilane Turpin; Carrie E Lyons; Nikita Viswasam; Elizabeth Hahn; Sofia Ryan; Stefan Baral; Bhakti Hansoti Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2021-11-19
Authors: H Manisha Yapa; Wendy Dhlomo-Mphatswe; Mosa Moshabela; Jan-Walter De Neve; Carina Herbst; Awachana Jiamsakul; Kathy Petoumenos; Frank A Post; Deenan Pillay; Till Bärnighausen; Sally Wyke Journal: Int J Health Policy Manag Date: 2022-05-01