| Literature DB >> 29911091 |
Diogo Lino Moura1, António Figueiredo1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Retrospective case-control study on the authors' experience regarding arthroplasty in high congenital dislocations of the hip in adults.Entities:
Keywords: Adult; Hip arthroplasty; Hip congenital dislocation; Hip joint; Osteotomy
Year: 2018 PMID: 29911091 PMCID: PMC6001389 DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2017.02.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Bras Ortop ISSN: 2255-4971
Fig. 1Subtrochanteric osteotomy technique. (A) Marking the level of the first cut of the subtrochanteric osteotomy with the test stem; (B) first cut of the subtrochanteric osteotomy; (C) proximal and distal femur milling and clamping of the distal femur; (D) reduction of the stem applied in the proximal femur to the previously applied acetabular component and its overlap with the distal femur, marking the amount of femur to be removed; (E) second cut of subtrochanteric osteotomy, in this case with an excision of about 3 cm of femur length (F); (G) application of the definitive conical femoral stem, passing first through the femoral fragment proximal to the osteotomy; (H) application of the definitive conical femoral stem through the distal femoral fragment; subsequently, prosthesis reduction is performed.
Descriptive analysis of the sample.
| CMPB | CMPB | RMSA | RMSA | VAPS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | ♀ | ♀ | ♀ | ♀ | ♀ |
| Side | L (bilateral dislocation) | R (bilateral dislocation) | R (bilateral dislocation) | L (bilateral dislocation) | L (bilateral dislocation, but only high on the left) |
| Dislocation time – age at surgery (years) | 26 | 27 | 44 | 45 | 19 |
| Follow-up time (years) | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
R, right; L, left.
Surgical intervention.
| CMPB | CMPB | RMSA | RMSA | VAPS | MHMT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reason for wanting arthroplasty | Hip pain, functional limitation | Hip pain, functional limitation | Hip pain, functional limitation | Hip pain, functional limitation | Hip pain, functional limitation | Hip pain, functional limitation |
| Access route | Posterior | Posterior | Posterior | Posterior | Posterior | Posterior |
| Type of femoral osteotomy | Subtrochanteric, secured with 1 plate and 2 steel cables | Supracondylar, secured with plate and 1 steel cable | Supracondylar, secured with plate | Supracondylar, secured with plate | Subtrochanteric, secured with steel cables | Subtrochanteric, no extra fixation |
| Prosthesis | Non-cemented, acetabulum with screw fixation, conical stem | Non-cemented, acetabulum with screw fixation, conical stem | Non-cemented, acetabulum with screw fixation, conical stem | Non-cemented, acetabulum with screw fixation, conical stem | Non-cemented, acetabulum with screw fixation, conical stem, shelf acetabuloplasty | Non-cemented, acetabulum with screw fixation, conical stem |
| Articular pars | Metal-polyethylene | Metal-polyethylene | Metal-polyethylene | Metal-polyethylene | Metal-polyethylene | Metal-polyethylene |
AVDs, activities of daily living.
Fig. 2Example of patient MMMM. Radiographs before and after arthroplasties due to bilateral high dislocation.
Postoperative period.
| CMPB | CMPB | RMSA | RMSA | VAPS | MHMT | MALS | MMMM | MMMM | MFDF | MFDF | Summary | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length of stay (days) | 11 | 11 | 13 | 12 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 11 | Mean 9.63 ± 2.87 |
| Transfusion of erythrocyte concentrate (EC) | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | 63.63% yes |
Clinical and functional results.
| CMPB | CMPB | RMSA | RMSA | VAPS | MHMT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harris Hip Score | 94 | 91 | 85 | 87 | 93 | 83 |
| Gait | Yes, without support | Yes, without support, slight Trendelenburg sign | Yes, without support | Yes, without support, slight Trendelenburg sign | ||
| Pain Relief | Yes, complete | Yes, incomplete | Yes, complete | Yes, complete | ||
| Satisfaction index (1–5) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | ||
| Osteotomy consolidation | Yes, 3 months | Yes, 3 months | Yes, 4 months | Yes, 3 months | Yes, 3 months | Yes, 4 months |
Complications.
| CMPB | CMPB | RMSA | RMSA | VAPS | MHMT | MALS | MMMM | MMMM | MFDF | MFDF | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | No | Intraoperative fracture of the great trochanter, fixation with K-wire and tension band | No | No | No | No | Sciatic neurapraxia (pain and paresthesias that disappeared within two months) | No | No | No | 18.18% complications: 9.09% iatrogenic fracture of the great trochanter; 9.09% sciatic neurapraxia |