Literature DB >> 29909961

Visual results after implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens in high myopes.

Gernot Steinwender1, Luisa Schwarz1, Myriam Böhm1, Anna Slavík-Lenčová1, Eva Hemkeppler1, Mehdi Shajari1, Thomas Kohnen2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report visual and refractive outcomes after implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) in highly myopic patients.
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
METHODS: This study included eyes with previous phacoemulsification and implantation of a trifocal IOL (AT LISA tri 839MP or 939MP) with an IOL power between 0.0 diopter (D) and 10.0 D. Postoperative outcomes at 3 months including uncorrected distance (UDVA), intermediate (UIVA), and near visual acuity (UNVA), corrected distance visual acuity, spherical equivalent, and refractive astigmatism were analyzed. Age-matched eyes after implantation of the same trifocal IOL with higher dioptric power (>10.0 D) served as controls.
RESULTS: Thirty-six eyes of 19 patients were included: 18 eyes (10 patients) in the highly myopic group (IOL power 0.0 to 10.0 D) and 18 eyes (9 patients) in the age-matched control group (IOL power >10.0 D). Three months postoperatively, the mean UDVA, UIVA, and UNVA in the highly myopic group were 0.06 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) ± 0.08 (SD), 0.13 ± 0.09 logMAR, and 0.12 ± 0.07 logMAR, and -0.01 ± 0.10 logMAR, 0.04 ± 0.10 logMAR, and 0.04 ± 0.11 logMAR in the control group, respectively (P = .022, P = .033, P = .053, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Implantation of a trifocal IOL in highly myopic eyes with low IOL power (0.0 to 10.0 D) provided satisfactory short-term visual and refractive outcomes; however, results were not as good as those obtained in eyes with higher dioptric IOL power.
Copyright © 2018 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29909961     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.04.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of visual outcomes of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens and a refractive bifocal intraocular lens in eyes with axial myopia: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Tong Sun; Yiyun Liu; Yufei Gao; Chuhao Tang; Qianqian Lan; Tingting Yang; Xiaorui Zhao; Hong Qi
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 2.  AcrySof IQ PanOptix Intraocular Lens Versus Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens and Trifocal Intraocular Lens: A Clinical Overview.

Authors:  Rachapalle Reddi Sudhir; Arindam Dey; Shovan Bhattacharrya; Amit Bahulayan
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug

3.  Spectacle Independence And Patient Satisfaction With Pseudophakic Mini-Monovision Using Aberration-Free Intraocular Lens.

Authors:  Tarek Abdelrazek Hafez; Hany Ahmed Helaly
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-31

4.  Distribution of ocular biometric parameters and optimal model of anterior chamber depth regression in 28,709 adult cataract patients in China using swept-source optical biometry.

Authors:  Qiong Lei; Haixia Tu; Xi Feng; Julio Ortega-Usobiaga; Danmin Cao; Yong Wang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 2.209

5.  Vision-related Quality of Life after Bilateral Implantation of Monofocal and Multifocal Intraocular Lenses.

Authors:  Shahram Bamdad; Seyyed Ahmad Razavizadegan; Mohsen Farvardin; Sahar Mohaghegh
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2022-01-21

6.  Presbyopia-correcting performance and subjective outcomes of a trifocal intraocular lens in eyes with different axial lengths: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Tong Sun; Yiyun Liu; Xiaorui Zhao; Yufei Gao; Tingting Yang; Qianqian Lan; Chuhao Tang; Hong Qi
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.