Renata Ferrarotto1, William N William1, Jennifer E Tseng2, Shanthi Marur3, Dong M Shin4, Barbara Murphy5, Ezra E W Cohen6, Christopher Y Thomas7, Richard Willey8, Jan Cosaert8, Nusrat Harun1, J Jack Lee1, Ignacio W Wistuba1, Robert I Haddad9, Bonnie S Glisson10. 1. University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States. 2. Orlando Health, University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Orlando, FL, United States. 3. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States. 4. Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States. 5. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States. 6. The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States. 7. Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, United States. 8. ImClone Systems LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company, Bridgewater, NJ, United States. 9. Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States. 10. University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States. Electronic address: bglisson@mdanderson.org.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES:Cixutumumab (CIX) and cetuximab (CET) monoclonal antibodies block ligand-binding to insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) respectively. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of CIX alone or combined with CET in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) patients. METHODS: In this open-label phase II trial, 91 R/M HNSCC patients who progressed within 90 days of platinum-based chemotherapy, were randomized to CIX 10 mg/kg alone or with CET 500 mg/m2 every 2 weeks. Patients were stratified by prior CET use. The primary endpoint was median progression-free survival (PFS). Exploratory biomarker assessments included relevant markers on archival tumor and serial cytokine/angiogenic-factor profiles in blood. RESULTS:Forty-seven patients were treated withCIX monotherapy and 44 with combination. The median PFS was 1.9 and 2.0 months and clinical benefit rate (complete or partial responses and stable disease) was 5.9% and 15.3%, respectively. There was no exacerbation of CET toxicity by concurrent CIX exposure. Higher tumor expression of IGF-1 was associated with improved PFS in the CIX + CET arm while increased p-EGFR expression correlated with shorter PFS in patients receiving single agent CIX. Higher serum baseline levels of IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 correlated with improved PFS and overall survival (OS) in the CIX arm. Neither regimen resulted in improved PFS or OS compared to historical data with CET alone. CONCLUSION: The results of this study do not support the use of cixutumumab alone or with cetuximab in unselected patients with R/M HNSCC.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES:Cixutumumab (CIX) and cetuximab (CET) monoclonal antibodies block ligand-binding to insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) respectively. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of CIX alone or combined with CET in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) patients. METHODS: In this open-label phase II trial, 91 R/M HNSCC patients who progressed within 90 days of platinum-based chemotherapy, were randomized to CIX 10 mg/kg alone or with CET 500 mg/m2 every 2 weeks. Patients were stratified by prior CET use. The primary endpoint was median progression-free survival (PFS). Exploratory biomarker assessments included relevant markers on archival tumor and serial cytokine/angiogenic-factor profiles in blood. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were treated with CIX monotherapy and 44 with combination. The median PFS was 1.9 and 2.0 months and clinical benefit rate (complete or partial responses and stable disease) was 5.9% and 15.3%, respectively. There was no exacerbation of CET toxicity by concurrent CIX exposure. Higher tumor expression of IGF-1 was associated with improved PFS in the CIX + CET arm while increased p-EGFR expression correlated with shorter PFS in patients receiving single agent CIX. Higher serum baseline levels of IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 correlated with improved PFS and overall survival (OS) in the CIX arm. Neither regimen resulted in improved PFS or OS compared to historical data with CET alone. CONCLUSION: The results of this study do not support the use of cixutumumab alone or with cetuximab in unselected patients with R/M HNSCC.