Literature DB >> 29909739

Influence of non-homogeneous mixing on final epidemic size in a meta-population model.

Jingan Cui1, Yanan Zhang1, Zhilan Feng1,2.   

Abstract

In meta-population models for infectious diseases, the basic reproduction number R0 can be as much as 70% larger in the case of preferential mixing than that in homogeneous mixing [J.W. Glasser, Z. Feng, S.B. Omer, P.J. Smith, and L.E. Rodewald, The effect of heterogeneity in uptake of the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine on the potential for outbreaks of measles: A modelling study, Lancet ID 16 (2016), pp. 599-605. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00004-9 ]. This suggests that realistic mixing can be an important factor to consider in order for the models to provide a reliable assessment of intervention strategies. The influence of mixing is more significant when the population is highly heterogeneous. In this paper, another quantity, the final epidemic size ( F ) of an outbreak, is considered to examine the influence of mixing and population heterogeneity. Final size relation is derived for a meta-population model accounting for a general mixing. The results show that F can be influenced by the pattern of mixing in a significant way. Another interesting finding is that, heterogeneity in various sub-population characteristics may have the opposite effect on R0 and F .

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epidemic meta-population models; final epidemic size; non-homogeneous mixing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29909739     DOI: 10.1080/17513758.2018.1484186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Dyn        ISSN: 1751-3758            Impact factor:   2.179


  5 in total

1.  An SIS model for the epidemic dynamics with two phases of the human day-to-day activity.

Authors:  Hiromi Seno
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Simulation-free estimation of an individual-based SEIR model for evaluating nonpharmaceutical interventions with an application to COVID-19 in the District of Columbia.

Authors:  Daniel K Sewell; Aaron Miller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Effect of Non-homogeneous Mixing and Asymptomatic Individuals on Final Epidemic Size and Basic Reproduction Number in a Meta-Population Model.

Authors:  Jingan Cui; Yucui Wu; Songbai Guo
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.871

4.  The heterogeneous mixing model of COVID-19 with interventions.

Authors:  Moran Duan; Zhen Jin
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 2.405

5.  The impact of COVID-19 and strategies for mitigation and suppression in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Patrick G T Walker; Charles Whittaker; Oliver J Watson; Marc Baguelin; Peter Winskill; Arran Hamlet; Bimandra A Djafaara; Zulma Cucunubá; Daniela Olivera Mesa; Will Green; Hayley Thompson; Shevanthi Nayagam; Kylie E C Ainslie; Sangeeta Bhatia; Samir Bhatt; Adhiratha Boonyasiri; Olivia Boyd; Nicholas F Brazeau; Lorenzo Cattarino; Gina Cuomo-Dannenburg; Amy Dighe; Christl A Donnelly; Ilaria Dorigatti; Sabine L van Elsland; Rich FitzJohn; Han Fu; Katy A M Gaythorpe; Lily Geidelberg; Nicholas Grassly; David Haw; Sarah Hayes; Wes Hinsley; Natsuko Imai; David Jorgensen; Edward Knock; Daniel Laydon; Swapnil Mishra; Gemma Nedjati-Gilani; Lucy C Okell; H Juliette Unwin; Robert Verity; Michaela Vollmer; Caroline E Walters; Haowei Wang; Yuanrong Wang; Xiaoyue Xi; David G Lalloo; Neil M Ferguson; Azra C Ghani
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 47.728

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.