Emrah Dagdeviren1, Berna Aslan Çetin2, Begum Aydogan Mathyk3, Nadiye Koroglu1, Elif Goknur Topcu1, Mehmet Aytac Yuksel1. 1. Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Research and Training Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Istanbul, Turkey. 2. Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Research and Training Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Istanbul, Turkey. Electronic address: bernaaslan14@hotmail.com. 3. University of North Carolina, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Electronic address: begum_mathyk@med.unc.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Induction of labor is a common practice in obstetrics. In recent years, a newer ultrasonographic parameter called the uterocervical angle (UCA) has been identified as a predictive tool for births. Our purpose is to investigate the role of UCA in predicting successful induction of labor. METHODS: The nulliparous term pregnancies (n:150) were grouped into successful/failed inductions of labor based on their progress into the active phase of labor after the administration of prostaglandin E2 (dinoprostone). The pre-induction cervical length (CL) and UCA were compared in the two groups. The study population was further grouped according to their modes of delivery and pre-induction UCAs were compared among the subgroups. RESULTS: The mean UCAs were not significant among the successful induction and failed induction groups (105.46 ± 20.54 degrees in the successful group and 110.57 ± 13.46 degrees in the failed group). However, UCAs significantly varied among the modes of delivery subgroups. The median UCA was significantly higher in patients who delivered vaginally after a successful induction of labor than in patients who delivered via cesarean section. The median UCA value was lowest in patients who had a successful induction of labor but ended up having a cesarean section (Fig. 2). Further, the duration of the active phase of labor negatively correlated with the UCA but not the CL (rho=-0.23, p = 0.02). There was also a negative correlation between the CL and the UCA in patients who delivered vaginally after successful induction of labor (rho= -0.21, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: The UCA is a promising ultrasonographic marker in obstetrics. Although the pre-induction UCA did not predict the outcome of labor induction, patients with broader pre-induction UCAs were prone to have a shorter duration of active phase. The pre-induction CL and UCA are inversely corraleted in nulliparous women who delivered vaginally after a successful induction of labor.
PURPOSE: Induction of labor is a common practice in obstetrics. In recent years, a newer ultrasonographic parameter called the uterocervical angle (UCA) has been identified as a predictive tool for births. Our purpose is to investigate the role of UCA in predicting successful induction of labor. METHODS: The nulliparous term pregnancies (n:150) were grouped into successful/failed inductions of labor based on their progress into the active phase of labor after the administration of prostaglandin E2 (dinoprostone). The pre-induction cervical length (CL) and UCA were compared in the two groups. The study population was further grouped according to their modes of delivery and pre-induction UCAs were compared among the subgroups. RESULTS: The mean UCAs were not significant among the successful induction and failed induction groups (105.46 ± 20.54 degrees in the successful group and 110.57 ± 13.46 degrees in the failed group). However, UCAs significantly varied among the modes of delivery subgroups. The median UCA was significantly higher in patients who delivered vaginally after a successful induction of labor than in patients who delivered via cesarean section. The median UCA value was lowest in patients who had a successful induction of labor but ended up having a cesarean section (Fig. 2). Further, the duration of the active phase of labor negatively correlated with the UCA but not the CL (rho=-0.23, p = 0.02). There was also a negative correlation between the CL and the UCA in patients who delivered vaginally after successful induction of labor (rho= -0.21, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: The UCA is a promising ultrasonographic marker in obstetrics. Although the pre-induction UCA did not predict the outcome of labor induction, patients with broader pre-induction UCAs were prone to have a shorter duration of active phase. The pre-induction CL and UCA are inversely corraleted in nulliparous women who delivered vaginally after a successful induction of labor.