Literature DB >> 29909192

Prepuce sparing: Use of Z-plasty for treatment of phimosis and scarred foreskin.

Michael Benson1, Moneer K Hanna2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND
OBJECTIVES: The desire to preserve the prepuce is often based on cultural norms. Recently, the concept of "genital autonomy" has been invoked to delay circumcision (or any genital altering procedure) until the individual reaches maturity and can make his or her own decision. However, some uncircumcised boys develop one or more episodes of balanitis resulting in scarring of the prepuce and pathologic phimosis which is difficult to treat. Herein we report on the management of severe phimosis and preputial scarring using preputial Z-plasties.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 28 patients, aged 3-12 years who underwent prepuce-sparing surgery within the previous 5 years with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. All patients were uncircumcised, with severe phimosis defined as a tight, pinpoint opening. All patients failed to respond to 6-10 weeks of betamethasone treatment. All parents requested preservation of as much of the foreskin as possible.
RESULTS: All patients healed satisfactorily, without infection, hematoma, or flap necrosis. One child developed mild scarring which responded to local steroid application. At follow-up evaluation, ranging from 6 to 24 months, the prepuce was fully retractable in all patients (Fig.).
CONCLUSIONS: Excision of the scarred preputial ring results in a circular suture line, which is in essence a straight line, curved and connected at each end, and this is likely to contract over time. The principle of Z-plasty can be exploited to elongate and interrupt the straight line, preventing contracture thus widening and sparing the prepuce.
Copyright © 2018 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Circumcision; Phimosis; Preputioplasty; Z-plasty

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29909192     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.04.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Urol        ISSN: 1477-5131            Impact factor:   1.830


  3 in total

Review 1.  Preputioplasty as a surgical alternative in treatment of phimosis.

Authors:  Daniar Osmonov; Claudius Hamann; Ahmed Eraky; Almut Kalz; Diethild Melchior; Robert Bergholz; Javier Romero-Otero
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  Circumferential dissection of deep fascia as ancillary technique in circumcision: is it possible to correct phimosis increasing penis size?

Authors:  Pagano Carmine; Faenza Mario; Guastafierro Antonio; Manfellotto Vincenzo; Grella Elisa; Cosenza Angelo; Pieretti Gorizio; Izzo Sara
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 3.  Male esthetic genital surgery: recommendations and gaps to be filled.

Authors:  Carlo Bettocchi; Andrea Alberto Checchia; Ugo Giovanni Falagario; Anna Ricapito; Gian Maria Busetto; Luigi Cormio; Giuseppe Carrieri
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.408

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.