Literature DB >> 29909190

Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Does age matter?

T Kawal1, A K Srinivasan1, D Shrivastava1, D I Chu1, J Van Batavia1, D Weiss1, C Long1, A R Shukla2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although shown to be safe in infancy, robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is most commonly performed in older children and adolescents.
OBJECTIVE: This study examined a contemporary RALP experience at a single tertiary pediatric center and compared outcomes in infants aged ≤1 year with an older cohort. METHODS AND
DESIGN: All RALP procedures were entered into an Institutional Review Board-approved data registry from 2012 to 2016. Patients were retrospectively grouped according to age. The primary outcome was success rate. Secondary outcomes included complications and length of hospital stay. Failure was defined as the need for secondary surgical intervention for UPJO or worsening urinary tract dilation on imaging. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 20. Mann-Whitney U testing was used for comparison.
RESULTS: A total of 138 patients underwent RALP during 2012-2016, with a median age of 6 years (IQR 1, 13.25) and a male:female ratio of approximately 2:1. Of these, 34 (24.6%) were aged ≤1 year. Of all patients, 60 (43.5%) presented with a history of prenatal hydronephrosis, and 32% had a crossing vessel causing obstruction. An indwelling stent was placed in antegrade fashion in 71% of cases, and 18% had a percutaneously placed externalized stent. There were six (4%) failures requiring reoperation. Multivariate and comparative analysis demonstrated that the infant cohort utilized less morphine equivalents and more often had a percutaneous stent placed compared to the older cohort. Of the complications that occurred, 60% were minor (Clavien grades 1 and 2) and 40% were Clavien grade 3 in the infant cohort, and 70.1% and 29.9% in the older cohort, respectively. No studied criteria predicted failure in either cohort.
CONCLUSION: This study presented one of the largest contemporary series of consecutive pediatric RALPs, and showed an overall success rate of 96%. There were no significant differences in length of hospital stay, and complications or failure rates in infants compared to older children. This study substantiated the ongoing trend towards the adaptation of robotic-assisted surgery for the entire pediatric patient population.
Copyright © 2018 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Infant robotic surgery; Minimally invasive surgery; Pyeloplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29909190     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.04.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Urol        ISSN: 1477-5131            Impact factor:   1.830


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of a new robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgical system for procedures in small cavities.

Authors:  Robert Bergholz; Sanne Botden; Johannes Verweij; Stefaan Tytgat; Wim Van Gemert; Michael Boettcher; Heiko Ehlert; Konrad Reinshagen; Stefano Gidaro
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-04-16

2.  Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Management of Persistent Mullerian Duct Structures in a Male Infant: A Novel Technique.

Authors:  Alexandra Pearce; Chad Crigger; Ali Hajiran; Osama Al-Omar
Journal:  J Endourol Case Rep       Date:  2020-03-11

Review 3.  Advances and Trends in Pediatric Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Authors:  Andreas Meinzer; Ibrahim Alkatout; Thomas Franz Krebs; Jonas Baastrup; Katja Reischig; Roberts Meiksans; Robert Bergholz
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Evaluation of the Versius Robotic Surgical System for Procedures in Small Cavities.

Authors:  Marit Kayser; Thomas Franz Krebs; Ibrahim Alkatout; Timo Kayser; Katja Reischig; Jonas Baastrup; Andreas Meinzer; Katja Ulrich; Daniar Osmonov; Robert Bergholz
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-03

5.  A Comparative Analysis of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Pediatric and Adult Patients: Does Age Matter?

Authors:  Bosik Kang; Jungyo Suh; Bumjin Lim; Kun Suk Kim; Sang Hoon Song
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 4.964

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.