Literature DB >> 29908990

Development and validation of response markers to predict survival and pleurodesis success in patients with malignant pleural effusion (PROMISE): a multicohort analysis.

Ioannis Psallidas1, Nikolaos I Kanellakis2, Stephen Gerry3, Marie Laëtitia Thézénas4, Philip D Charles4, Anastasia Samsonova5, Herbert B Schiller6, Roman Fischer4, Rachelle Asciak2, Robert J Hallifax2, Rachel Mercer2, Melissa Dobson7, Tao Dong8, Ian D Pavord9, Gary S Collins3, Benedikt M Kessler4, Harvey I Pass10, Nick Maskell11, Georgios T Stathopoulos12, Najib M Rahman13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of malignant pleural effusion is increasing worldwide, but prognostic biomarkers to plan treatment and to understand the underlying mechanisms of disease progression remain unidentified. The PROMISE study was designed with the objectives to discover, validate, and prospectively assess biomarkers of survival and pleurodesis response in malignant pleural effusion and build a score that predicts survival.
METHODS: In this multicohort study, we used five separate and independent datasets from randomised controlled trials to investigate potential biomarkers of survival and pleurodesis. Mass spectrometry-based discovery was used to investigate pleural fluid samples for differential protein expression in patients from the discovery group with different survival and pleurodesis outcomes. Clinical, radiological, and biological variables were entered into least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression to build a model that predicts 3-month mortality. We evaluated the model using internal and external validation.
FINDINGS: 17 biomarker candidates of survival and seven of pleurodesis were identified in the discovery dataset. Three independent datasets (n=502) were used for biomarker validation. All pleurodesis biomarkers failed, and gelsolin, macrophage migration inhibitory factor, versican, and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 (TIMP1) emerged as accurate predictors of survival. Eight variables (haemoglobin, C-reactive protein, white blood cell count, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, cancer type, pleural fluid TIMP1 concentrations, and previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy) were validated and used to develop a survival score. Internal validation with bootstrap resampling and external validation with 162 patients from two independent datasets showed good discrimination (C statistic values of 0·78 [95% CI 0·72-0·83] for internal validation and 0·89 [0·84-0·93] for external validation of the clinical PROMISE score).
INTERPRETATION: To our knowledge, the PROMISE score is the first prospectively validated prognostic model for malignant pleural effusion that combines biological and clinical parameters to accurately estimate 3-month mortality. It is a robust, clinically relevant prognostic score that can be applied immediately, provide important information on patient prognosis, and guide the selection of appropriate management strategies. FUNDING: European Respiratory Society, Medical Research Funding-University of Oxford, Slater & Gordon Research Fund, and Oxfordshire Health Services Research Committee Research Grants.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29908990     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30294-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  26 in total

1.  Thoracoscopy and talc poudrage compared with intercostal drainage and talc slurry infusion to manage malignant pleural effusion: the TAPPS RCT.

Authors:  Rahul Bhatnagar; Ramon Luengo-Fernandez; Brennan C Kahan; Najib M Rahman; Robert F Miller; Nick A Maskell
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 2.  Making cold malignant pleural effusions hot: driving novel immunotherapies.

Authors:  Pranav Murthy; Chigozirim N Ekeke; Kira L Russell; Samuel C Butler; Yue Wang; James D Luketich; Adam C Soloff; Rajeev Dhupar; Michael T Lotze
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 8.110

Review 3.  Interpreting pleural fluid results .

Authors:  Rachel M Mercer; John P Corcoran; Jose M Porcel; Najib M Rahman; Ioannis Psallidas
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.659

4.  Does the LENT score risk-stratify patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma? An observational study.

Authors:  Bertrand Chollet; Julien Guinde; Sophie Laroumagne; Hervé Dutau; Philippe Astoul
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  Breast and Lung Effusion Survival Score Models: Improving Survival Prediction in Patients With Malignant Pleural Effusion and Metastasis.

Authors:  Sofia Molina; Gabriela Martinez-Zayas; Paula V Sainz; Cheuk H Leung; Liang Li; Horiana B Grosu; Roberto Adachi; David E Ost
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 10.262

6.  Interventions for the management of malignant pleural effusions: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexandra Dipper; Hayley E Jones; Rahul Bhatnagar; Nancy J Preston; Nick Maskell; Amelia O Clive
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-21

7.  Thymidine kinase 1 concentration in pleural effusion is a diagnostic marker and survival predictor for malignant pleural effusion.

Authors:  Tian Tian; Jun Li; Wenjun Hu; Cuiling Sun; Jian Zhou
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 2.352

8.  Whole-genome sequencing suggests a role of MIF in the pathophysiology of TEMPI syndrome.

Authors:  Chunyan Sun; Jian Xu; Bo Zhang; Haifan Huang; Lei Chen; Han Yan; Aoshuang Xu; Fei Zhao; Daijuan Huang; Liqiong Liu; Jian Li; Yu Hu
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-06-22

9.  Tumour cell PD-L1 expression is prognostic in patients with malignant pleural effusion: the impact of C-reactive protein and immune-checkpoint inhibition.

Authors:  Elisabeth Stubenberger; Clemens Aigner; Bahil Ghanim; Anna Rosenmayr; Paul Stockhammer; Melanie Vogl; Ali Celik; Aynur Bas; Ismail Cuneyt Kurul; Nalan Akyurek; Alexander Varga; Till Plönes; Agnes Bankfalvi; Thomas Hager; Martin Schuler; Klaus Hackner; Peter Errhalt; Axel Scheed; Gernot Seebacher; Balazs Hegedus
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Predicting Survival for Patients with Malignant Pleural Effusion: Development of the CONCH Prognostic Model.

Authors:  Xin Zhang; Feng-Shuang Yi; Huan-Zhong Shi
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.