Literature DB >> 29908805

Field trial to evaluate the effect of an intranasal respiratory vaccine protocol on calf health, ultrasonographic lung consolidation, and growth in Holstein dairy calves.

T L Ollivett1, K E Leslie2, T F Duffield2, D V Nydam3, J Hewson4, J Caswell5, P Dunn2, D F Kelton6.   

Abstract

The objective of this field trial was to evaluate the effect of a vaccine protocol using a commercially available trivalent vaccine designed for intranasal use. Experimental challenge studies have demonstrated varying efficacies of vaccines administered via the intranasal route. A total of 468 calves from 3 herds were enrolled and randomized into 3 treatment groups (positive control, PC, n = 211; intranasal vaccine, IN, n = 215; negative control, NC, n = 42) and followed for 8 to 12 wk. The PC consisted of one dose of commercially available multivalent injectable vaccine against bovine respiratory syncytial virus, infectious bovine rhinotracheitis, parainfluenza 3, and bovine viral diarrhea administered subcutaneously at 6 wk of age. The IN was administered at enrollment and 6 wk of age, and contained antigen against bovine respiratory syncytial virus, infectious bovine rhinotracheitis, and parainfluenza 3. The NC was sterile saline administered intranasally and subcutaneously at enrollment and 6 wk of age. Clinical illness was assessed using systematic respiratory scoring, and thoracic ultrasonography was used to identify the lung consolidation associated with pneumonia. Rib fractures were identified in 6% of calves, and an association was observed between rib fractures and calving ease. Overall, 54% of the calves had at least one episode of an abnormal respiratory score (ILL). Vaccination protocol did not affect the occurrence of ILL. Similarly, 54% of the calves had at least one episode of lung consolidation ≥3 cm (CON). Vaccine protocol affected the odds of CON. The odds of CON in PC were 1.63 (95% confidence interval: 1.04-2.56) times the odds of CON in IN, and 0.38 (95% confidence interval: 0.16-0.93) times the odds of CON in NC. The odds of CON in IN were 0.23 (95% confidence interval: 0.09-0.59) times the odds of CON in NC. The outcomes ILL and CON were associated; however, the measure of agreement was only fair (kappa = 0.38). Multivariable linear regression revealed an interaction between vaccine protocol and herd on average daily gain (ADG); therefore, these data were stratified. In herd 1, IN (0.53 ± 0.03 kg/d) decreased ADG compared with PC (0.63 ± 0.03 kg/d). In herd 2, IN increased ADG (0.41 ± 0.03 kg/d) compared with PC (0.38 ± 0.03 kg/d). In contrast, none of the protocols affected ADG at herd 3. In conclusion, this commercially available trivalent IN vaccine protocol did not alter the incidence of ILL, reduced the risk of lung lesions associated with pneumonia, and improved the ADG of the calves in one of the commercial study herds.
Copyright © 2018 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bovine respiratory disease; intranasal vaccine; thoracic ultrasound

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29908805     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-14271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  7 in total

1.  A field comparison of heterologous and homologous routes of administration of modified live vaccines for the control of bovine respiratory disease in recently weaned beef calves.

Authors:  Nathan Erickson; John Ellis; Cheryl Waldner; Herbert Lardner; Sheryl Gow; John Campbell; Adam Berenik
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Multiple imaging modalities for the diagnosis of tracheal collapse in a calf: A case report.

Authors:  Hanna Vermedal; Luis G Arroyo; Christina McKenzie; John D Baird
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Quantifying subclinical trauma associated with calving difficulty, vigour, and passive immunity in newborn beef calves.

Authors:  Jennifer M Pearson; Elizabeth R Homerosky; Nigel A Caulkett; John R Campbell; Michel Levy; Edmond A Pajor; M Claire Windeyer
Journal:  Vet Rec Open       Date:  2019-01-25

Review 4.  Bovine Respiratory Disease Vaccination Against Viral Pathogens: Modified-Live Versus Inactivated Antigen Vaccines, Intranasal Versus Parenteral, What Is the Evidence?

Authors:  Manuel F Chamorro; Roberto A Palomares
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.357

5.  The effect of bovine vaccines against respiratory viruses administered either intranasal or intramuscular on broncho-alveolar fluid cells of heifers.

Authors:  Patricia S Rossi; Rafael I Mattei; Natali R Schllemer; Gabriela R Thomaz; Anna V Antunes; Mauricio P Virmond; Mari J Taube; Heloisa G Bertagnon
Journal:  Vet Q       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.320

6.  The Health and Behavioural Effects of Individual versus Pair Housing of Calves at Different Ages on a UK Commercial Dairy Farm.

Authors:  Sophie A Mahendran; D Claire Wathes; Richard E Booth; Nicola Blackie
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Effectiveness of two intranasal vaccines for the control of bovine respiratory disease in newborn beef calves: A randomized non-inferiority multicentre field trial.

Authors:  N Masset; F Meurens; M Marie; P Lesage; A Lehébel; N Brisseau; S Assié
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 2.688

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.