Literature DB >> 29908418

The FOSSIL Study: FLAG or standard 7+3 induction therapy in secondary acute myeloid leukemia.

Vera Vulaj1, Anthony J Perissinotti2, James R Uebel3, Victoria R Nachar4, Gianni B Scappaticci5, Ashley Crouch6, Dale L Bixby7, Patrick W Burke8, Ivan Maillard9, Moshe Talpaz10, Bernard L Marini2.   

Abstract

Patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) have poor outcomes, with CR/CRi rates of 25-35% with standard 7 + 3 induction chemotherapy, while single center non-comparative analyses suggest promising outcomes with FLAG. We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study assessing outcomes in treatment-naïve patients with sAML treated with fludarabine, high-dose cytarabine, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (FLAG, n = 40) compared with 7 + 3 (n = 66). Median patient age was 63 years (range: 27-82) in the FLAG group and 60 years (range: 21-76) in the 7 + 3 group (P = 0.968). Patients treated with FLAG achieved higher overall response rates (CR + CRi + MLFS) compared to 7 + 3 (70% vs. 48%, P = 0.043). FLAG was well tolerated, with only one induction death (30-day mortality rate, 3% vs. 8%, P = 0.405) and no cases of cerebellar toxicity. Duration of neutropenia was significantly shorter with FLAG (median 16 vs. 23 days, P < 0.001). Half of the FLAG-treated patients proceeded to consolidative therapy compared with only 27% of those who received 7 + 3 (P = 0.022). Overall survival was comparable between groups (8.5 mos, FLAG vs. 9.1 mos, 7 + 3; P = 0.798). Thus, FLAG may represent a low-cost treatment strategy in sAML that produces higher response rates and promising survival outcomes with minimal treatment-related toxicity. Further studies are required to prospectively compare FLAG to the newly FDA-approved CPX-351 in sAML.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  7 + 3; CPX-351; FLAG; Secondary acute myeloid leukemia; sAML

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29908418     DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2018.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leuk Res        ISSN: 0145-2126            Impact factor:   3.156


  5 in total

Review 1.  Oncology stewardship in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Madeleine A Ochs; Bernard L Marini; Anthony J Perissinotti; Charles E Foucar; Kristen Pettit; Patrick Burke; Dale L Bixby; Lydia L Benitez
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 4.030

2.  Survival Improvement over Time of 960 s-AML Patients Included in 13 EORTC-GIMEMA-HOVON Trials.

Authors:  Safaa M Ramadan; Stefan Suciu; Marian J P L Stevens-Kroef; Roelof Willemze; Sergio Amadori; Theo de Witte; Bob Löwenberg; Petra Muus; Boris Labar; Liv Meert; Gaetan de Schaetzen; Giovanna Meloni; Giuseppe Leone; Marco Vignetti; Jean-Pierre Marie; Michael Lübbert; Frédéric Baron
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 3.  Treatment Strategies for Therapy-related Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Prajwal Dhakal; Bimatshu Pyakuryal; Prasun Pudasainee; Venkat Rajasurya; Krishna Gundabolu; Vijaya Raj Bhatt
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2019-12-24

4.  Impact of induction chemotherapy with intermediate-dosed cytarabine and subsequent allogeneic stem cell transplantation on the outcome of high-risk acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Maximilian Fleischmann; Ulf Schnetzke; Jochen J Frietsch; Herbert G Sayer; Karin Schrenk; Jakob Hammersen; Anita Glaser; Inken Hilgendorf; Andreas Hochhaus; Sebastian Scholl
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 4.322

Review 5.  Anthracycline-related cardiotoxicity in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a Young SIOG review paper.

Authors:  Nina Rosa Neuendorff; Kah Poh Loh; Alice S Mims; Konstantinos Christofyllakis; Wee-Kheng Soo; Bediha Bölükbasi; Carlos Oñoro-Algar; William G Hundley; Heidi D Klepin
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-02-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.