Literature DB >> 29908101

Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of actinic cheilitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Marianne de Vasconcelos Carvalho1,2, Sandra Lúcia Dantas de Moraes1, Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo Lemos3, Joel Ferreira Santiago Júnior4, Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito Vasconcelos1, Eduardo Piza Pellizzer3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review was to compare outcomes between surgical and non-surgical treatment of actinic cheilitis (AC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline were performed. A search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted. Articles were selected based on the inclusion criteria: randomized clinical trials, prospective/retrospective studies, and case series with at least 10 patients, with a minimum follow-up period of 6 months. A weighted remission rate (RER) and recurrence rate (RR) with a 95% confidence interval was performed. Data analysis was performed using a comprehensive meta-analysis software.
RESULTS: A total of 283 ACs in 10 studies were included. About 2.5% surgically treated cases underwent malignant transformation. The weighted remission rate was higher for surgical (92.8%) compared to non-surgical treatment (65.9%). The recurrence rate was lower for surgical (8.4%) compared to non-surgical treatment (19.2%).
CONCLUSION: In this systematic review, the surgical treatment was more favorable than non-surgical for AC. Meanwhile, further studies are needed that should maximize methodological standardization and have greater rigor of the data collection process.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  actinic cheilitis; intervention; management

Year:  2018        PMID: 29908101     DOI: 10.1111/odi.12916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Dis        ISSN: 1354-523X            Impact factor:   3.511


  5 in total

1.  Actinic cheilitis or squamous cell carcinoma of the lip? Practical recommendations on how to avoid a trap.

Authors:  Hudson Dutra Rezende; Daniel Oliveira; Marinna Sampaio Campos; Loanda Oliveira Fukuma; Juliana de Carvalho Delgado; Sandra Lopes Mattos Dinato
Journal:  Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 1.712

Review 2.  Laser Therapy for the Treatment of Actinic Cheilitis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Angela Ayen-Rodriguez; Maria Jose Naranjo-Diaz; Ricardo Ruiz-Villaverde
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  The effectiveness of microwave disinfection in treating Candida-associated denture stomatitis: a systematic review and metaanalysis.

Authors:  Rodrigo Moreira Bringel da Costa; Rodrigo Lorenzi Poluha; Giancarlo De la Torre Canales; Joel Ferreira Santiago Junior; Paulo Cesar Rodrigues Conti; Karin Hermana Neppelenbroek; Vinicius Carvalho Porto
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Postoperative pain in endodontic retreatment of one visit versus multiple visits: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Gabriel Pereira Nunes; Alberto Carlos Botazzo Delbem; Jessica Marcela Luna Gomes; Cleidiel Aparecido Araújo Lemos; Eduardo Piza Pellizzer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  5-Aminolevulinic acid patch (Alacare) photodynamic therapy for actinic cheilitis: data from a prospective 12-month follow-up study on 21 patients.

Authors:  S Radakovic; M Dangl; A Tanew
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 6.166

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.