Literature DB >> 29907912

Temporary epiphysiodesis using the FlexTack™ implant (tension band) featuring a modified explantation technique.

S Koob1, M Kehrer2, M Hettchen2, T Jansen2, J Schmolders2, R Placzek2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Presenting the implantation of the PediatrOS™ FlexTack™ (Merete, Berlin, Germany) for growth guidance and a modified explantation procedure to facilitate explantation and prevent bone and soft tissue damage. INDICATIONS: Implantation: Genua vara and valga, coxa vara, varus and valgus deviation of the ankle joint, the elbow joint and the wrist Modified Explantation: Removal of the implant after successful limb correction or dislocation of the implant. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Implantation: Closed growth plates, insufficient remaining growth potential, acute or chronic infection, insufficient osseous structures, severe muscular, nervous or vessel diseases endangering the respective limb Explantation: General inoperability of the patient. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Implantation: Localization of the growth plate. Insertion of K‑wire parallel to joint line on the joint side. Setting of the implant. Insertion of second K‑wire and insertion with the implantation instrument and hammer. Modified Explantation: Cutting of the implant bridging part. Both ends of the bridging part are bent vertically to prevent soft tissue damage. Dissection of both implant arms from the bone with the chisel. Extraction in 360° motion using tooth extraction pliers. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Implantation: Full weight bearing. X‑ray controls every 3 months to control growth correction. Explantation: Full weight bearing.
RESULTS: Complications such as breaking of the k‑wires, breaking of the chisel or extraction of adhering bone tissue occurred in 14 of the 64 (21.9%) explanted FlexTack implants. Complication-free removal using the original instruments provided by the manufacturer was possible for five implants. The modified explantation procedure as described above was applied in 45 explanted implants (70.3%) with complete removal of the implant without further complications within the follow up period.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Explantation; Growth deformity; Growth guidance; Growth plate; Tension band

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29907912     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-018-0553-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  7 in total

1.  Control of bone growth by epiphyseal stapling; a preliminary report.

Authors:  W P BLOUNT; G R CLARKE
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1949-07       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Intertrochanteric displacement osteotomy in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the hip. Results of follow-up examination.

Authors:  P Salenius; A Langenskiöld; K Osterman
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1971

3.  [The significance of axial misalignment as a pre-osteoarthrotic deformity, and its radiological assessment].

Authors:  O Oest
Journal:  Unfallheilkunde       Date:  1978-11

4.  Epiphysiodesis: a problem of timing.

Authors:  V P Blair; S J Walker; J J Sheridan; P L Schoenecker
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 2.324

5.  Correcting genu varum and genu valgum in children by guided growth: temporary hemiepiphysiodesis using tension band plates.

Authors:  M S Ballal; C E Bruce; S Nayagam
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-02

6.  Guided growth for angular correction: a preliminary series using a tension band plate.

Authors:  Peter M Stevens
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2007 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.324

7.  Correction of bone angular deformities: experimental analysis of staples versus 8-plate.

Authors:  Rodolfo A Goyeneche; Claudio E Primomo; Norberto Lambert; Horacio Miscione
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2009 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.324

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.