Literature DB >> 29907806

Final outcomes of escalated melphalan 280 mg/m2 with amifostine cytoprotection followed autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: high CR and VGPR rates do not translate into improved survival.

Parameswaran Hari1, Donna E Reece2, Jasleen Randhawa1, Neal Flomenberg3, Dianna S Howard4, Ashrof Z Badros5, Aaron P Rapoport5, Barry R Meisenberg6, Joanne Filicko-Ohara3, Gordon L Phillips4, David H Vesole7.   

Abstract

The most common preparative regimen for autologous transplantation (ASCT) in myeloma (MM) consists of melphalan 200 mg/m2 (MEL 200). Higher doses of melphalan 220-260 mg/m2, although relatively well tolerated, have not shown significant improvement in clinical outcomes. Several approaches have been pursued in the past to improve CR rates, including poly-chemotherapy preparative regimens, tandem ASCT, consolidation, and/or maintenance therapy. Since there is a steep dose-response effect for intravenous melphalan, we evaluated an alternative single ASCT strategy using higher-dose melphalan at 280 mg/m2 (MEL 280) with amifostine as a cytoprotectant as the maximum tolerated dose determined in an earlier phase I dose escalation trial. We report the final long-term outcomes of MM patients who underwent conditioning with MEL 280 with amifostine cytoprotection followed by ASCT. Although the complete response rate was quite high in the era pre-dating the routine use of novel therapies (proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents) (49%), the progression-free survival was a disappointing 22 months. The implications of this dichotomy between the excellent depth of ASCT response and progression-free survival are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29907806     DOI: 10.1038/s41409-018-0261-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  4 in total

1.  Development of a method for clinical pharmacokinetic testing to allow for targeted Melphalan dosing in multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous transplant.

Authors:  Karen Sweiss; Bhaskar Vemu; Craig C Hofmeister; Eric Wenzler; Gregory Sampang Calip; John P Galvin; Nadim Mahmud; Damiano Rondelli; Jeremy James Johnson; Pritesh Patel
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Myeloma: Time for an Obituary or Not Just Yet!

Authors:  Sarita Rani Jaiswal; Suparno Chakrabarti
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 0.900

Review 3.  Current status of autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Rama Al Hamed; Abdul Hamid Bazarbachi; Florent Malard; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Mohamad Mohty
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 11.037

Review 4.  Stem-cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: how far have we come?

Authors:  Cinnie Y Soekojo; Shaji K Kumar
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2019-11-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.