Literature DB >> 29906869

Threshold q-voter model.

Allan R Vieira1, Celia Anteneodo1,2.   

Abstract

We introduce the threshold q-voter opinion dynamics where an agent, facing a binary choice, can change its mind when at least q_{0} among q neighbors share the opposite opinion. Otherwise, the agent can still change its mind with a certain probability ɛ. This threshold dynamics contemplates the possibility of persuasion by an influence group even when there is not full agreement among its members. In fact, individuals can follow their peers not only when there is unanimity (q_{0}=q) in the lobby group, as assumed in the q-voter model, but also, depending on the circumstances, when there is simple majority (q_{0}>q/2), Byzantine consensus (q_{0}>2q/3), or any minimal number q_{0} among q. This realistic threshold gives place to emerging collective states and phase transitions which are not observed in the standard q voter. The threshold q_{0}, together with the stochasticity introduced by ɛ, yields a phenomenology that mimics as particular cases the q voter with stochastic drivings such as nonconformity and independence. In particular, nonconsensus majority states are possible, as well as mixed phases. Continuous and discontinuous phase transitions can occur, but also transitions from fluctuating phases into absorbing states.

Year:  2018        PMID: 29906869     DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.97.052106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev E        ISSN: 2470-0045            Impact factor:   2.529


  6 in total

1.  Think then act or act then think?

Authors:  Arkadiusz Jędrzejewski; Grzegorz Marcjasz; Paul R Nail; Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Conformity in numbers-Does criticality in social responses exist?

Authors:  Piotr Nyczka; Katarzyna Byrka; Paul R Nail; Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Generalized Independence in the q-Voter Model: How Do Parameters Influence the Phase Transition?

Authors:  Angelika Abramiuk; Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-19       Impact factor: 2.524

4.  A Veritable Zoology of Successive Phase Transitions in the Asymmetric q-Voter Model on Multiplex Networks.

Authors:  Anna Chmiel; Julian Sienkiewicz; Agata Fronczak; Piotr Fronczak
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 2.524

5.  Is Independence Necessary for a Discontinuous Phase Transition within the q-Voter Model?

Authors:  Angelika Abramiuk; Jakub Pawłowski; Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 2.524

6.  On randomly changing conformity bias in cultural transmission.

Authors:  Kaleda K Denton; Uri Liberman; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.