Literature DB >> 29905628

Pharmacokinetics of 400 mg Locally Infiltrated Ropivacaine After Total Knee Arthroplasty Without Perioperative Tourniquet Use.

Sietske M K Bakker, Maaike G E Fenten, Daan J Touw1, Bart J F van den Bemt, Petra J C Heesterbeek2, Gert-Jan Scheffer3, Rudolf Stienstra.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) with ropivacaine for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasingly used. Despite the high doses of ropivacaine, LIA is considered safe, and this perception is sustained by pharmacokinetic data demonstrating that maximum concentrations of ropivacaine stay well below the toxic threshold in plasma. These pharmacokinetic studies all involve TKA procedures with the use of a tourniquet. Recently, performing TKA without the use of a tourniquet is gaining popularity, but no pharmacokinetic data exist when LIA is administered for TKA without the use of a tourniquet. The purpose of this study was to describe the pharmacokinetic profile of a single-shot ropivacaine (200 mL 0.2%) and 0.75 mg epinephrine (1000 μg/mL) when used for LIA in patients for TKA without a tourniquet.
METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 20 patients treated with LIA for TKA without a tourniquet were studied. Plasma samples were taken at 20, 40, 60, 90, 120, 240, 360, 480, 600, 720, and 1440 minutes after local anesthetic infiltration, in which total and unbound ropivacaine concentrations were determined.
RESULTS: Results are given as median (interquartile range [IQR]). Median peak ropivacaine concentration was 1.16 μg/mL (IQR, 0.46); median peak unbound ropivacaine concentration was 0.05 μg/mL (IQR, 0.02). The corresponding times to reach the maximum concentration for total and unbound ropivacaine were 360 (IQR, 240) and 360 (IQR, 360) minutes, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Although great interindividual variability in ropivacaine concentration was found, both total and unbound maximum serum concentrations remained below the assumed systemic toxic thresholds in all samples. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at Netherlands Trial Registry (http://www.trialregister.nl), trial ID NTR6306.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29905628     DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med        ISSN: 1098-7339            Impact factor:   6.288


  2 in total

1.  Additional periarticular catheter shows no superiority over single-shot local infiltration analgesia alone in unicondylar knee replacement.

Authors:  Malin Meier; Patrick Burkhardt; Jochen Huth; Raymond Best; Emmanuel Thienpont; Johannes Beckmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Continuous Adductor Canal Block used for postoperative pain relief after medial Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Fei Lan; Yanyan Shen; Yanhui Ma; Guanglei Cao; Nicole Philips; Ting Zhang; Tianlong Wang
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-06-29       Impact factor: 2.217

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.