Literature DB >> 29905413

PIK3CA mutation in gastric cancer and the role of microsatellite instability status in mutations of exons 9 and 20 of the PIK3CA gene.

Karol Polom1,2, Daniele Marrelli1, Giandomenico Roviello3,4, Valeria Pascale1, Costantino Voglino1, Carla Vindigni5, Daniele Generali4, Franco Roviello1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A better understanding of molecular gastric cancer (GC) entities may help in tailored treatments of that neoplasm. The PIK3CA mutation is one of the most important in many cancers.
OBJECTIVES: We performed a comparison of clinical and pathological data of the PIK3CA mutation in GC patients.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analysis was done on 472 patients operated on in 1 center. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used for the screening of PIK3CA (exon 9 and 20). For microsatellite instability (MSI) we used 5 quasi-monomorphic mononucleotide repeats - BAT-26, BAT-25, NR-24, NR-21, and NR-27. The clinical and pathological data was analyzed.
RESULTS: PIK3CA mutation was observed in 10 out of 472 GC patients (2.1%). Nine out of 10 were MSI (9 of 111 MSI patients - 8.1%). Half of the 10 patients had mutations in exon 9 and the other half in exon 20. A majority of patients with the PIK3CA mutation had MSI (p < 0.001). The 5-year survival of MSI patients with the PIK3CA mutation was 40% and without the mutation, 70.4% (p = 0.309). For patients with the mutation in exon 9, the 5-year survival was 0%, and for those with the mutation in exon 20, 80% (p = 0.031). The Cox proportional hazards regression analysis did not show that PIK3CA is statistically correlated with a worse overall survival.
CONCLUSIONS: PIK3CA mutation in GC is a rare finding. It is strongly associated with the MSI molecular subgroup, presenting a worse outcome than other MSI patients. A completely different outcome is associated with the mutation in exon 9 compared to the mutation in exon 20, with the latter being more favorable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PIK3CA; exon; gastric cancer; microsatellite instability; mutation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29905413     DOI: 10.17219/acem/70795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Clin Exp Med        ISSN: 1899-5276            Impact factor:   1.727


  5 in total

Review 1.  Signaling pathways and therapeutic interventions in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Zi-Ning Lei; Qiu-Xu Teng; Qin Tian; Wei Chen; Yuhao Xie; Kaiming Wu; Qianlin Zeng; Leli Zeng; Yihang Pan; Zhe-Sheng Chen; Yulong He
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2022-10-08

2.  Identification and Validation of SNP-Containing Genes With Prognostic Value in Gastric Cancer via Integrated Bioinformatics Analysis.

Authors:  Hui Li; Jing Guo; Guang Cheng; Yucheng Wei; Shihai Liu; Yaoyue Qi; Gongjun Wang; Ruoxi Xiao; Weiwei Qi; Wensheng Qiu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Prevalence and characteristics of PIK3CA mutation in mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Weihua Li; Tian Qiu; Lin Dong; Fanshuang Zhang; Lei Guo; Jianming Ying
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 4.207

4.  Machine Learning Identifies Pan-Cancer Landscape of Nrf2 Oxidative Stress Response Pathway-Related Genes.

Authors:  Na Li; Xianquan Zhan
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 6.543

5.  Clinicopathological and molecular features of responders to nivolumab for patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Saori Mishima; Akihito Kawazoe; Yoshiaki Nakamura; Akinori Sasaki; Daisuke Kotani; Yasutoshi Kuboki; Hideaki Bando; Takashi Kojima; Toshihiko Doi; Atsushi Ohtsu; Takayuki Yoshino; Takeshi Kuwata; Akihito Tsuji; Kohei Shitara
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 13.751

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.