Biplab Paul1, Emma M Björk1, Aparabal Kumar2, Jun Lu1, Per Eklund1. 1. Thin Film Physics Division, Department of Physics, Chemistry, and Biology (IFM), and Nanostructured Materials, Department of Physics, Chemistry, and Biology (IFM),Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden. 2. Materials Science Centre, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur 721302, India.
Abstract
The development of high-performance and transferable thin-film thermoelectric materials is important for low-power applications, e.g., to power wearable electronics, and for on-chip cooling. Nanoporous films offer an opportunity to improve thermoelectric performance by selectively scattering phonons without affecting electronic transport. Here, we report the growth of nanoporous Ca3Co4O9 thin films by a sequential sputtering-annealing method. Ca3Co4O9 is promising for its high Seebeck coefficient and good electrical conductivity and important for its nontoxicity, low cost, and abundance of its constituent raw materials. To grow nanoporous films, multilayered CaO/CoO films were deposited on sapphire and mica substrates by rf-magnetron reactive sputtering from elemental Ca and Co targets, followed by annealing at 700 °C to form the final phase of Ca3Co4O9. This phase transformation is accompanied by a volume contraction causing formation of nanopores in the film. The thermoelectric propoperties of the nanoporous Ca3Co4O9 films can be altered by controlling the porosity. The lowest electrical resistivity is ∼7 mΩ cm, yielding a power factor of 2.32 × 10-4 Wm-1K-2 near room temperature. Furthermore, the films are transferable from the primary mica substrates to other arbitrary polymer platforms by simple dry transfer, which opens an opportunity of low-temperature use these materials.
The development of high-performance and transferable thin-film thermoelectric materials is important for low-power applications, e.g., to power wearable electronics, and for on-chip cooling. Nanoporous films offer an opportunity to improve thermoelectric performance by selectively scattering phonons without affecting electronic transport. Here, we report the growth of nanoporous Ca3Co4O9 thin films by a sequential sputtering-annealing method. Ca3Co4O9 is promising for its high Seebeck coefficient and good electrical conductivity and important for its nontoxicity, low cost, and abundance of its constituent raw materials. To grow nanoporous films, multilayered CaO/CoO films were deposited on sapphire and mica substrates by rf-magnetron reactive sputtering from elemental Ca and Co targets, followed by annealing at 700 °C to form the final phase of Ca3Co4O9. This phase transformation is accompanied by a volume contraction causing formation of nanopores in the film. The thermoelectric propoperties of the nanoporous Ca3Co4O9 films can be altered by controlling the porosity. The lowest electrical resistivity is ∼7 mΩ cm, yielding a power factor of 2.32 × 10-4 Wm-1K-2 near room temperature. Furthermore, the films are transferable from the primary mica substrates to other arbitrary polymer platforms by simple dry transfer, which opens an opportunity of low-temperature use these materials.
Nanoporous materials are
promising in the area of thermoelectricity,
as they can enable simultaneous tailoring of electronic and phononic
properties in a single material system, leading to multifold enhancement
of thermoelectric efficiency.[1−3] The thermoelectric efficiency
of any material system is related to dimensionless thermoelectric
figure of merit ZT (=S2T/ρκ), where S, ρ,
κ, and T are the Seebeck coefficient, electrical
resistivity, thermal conductivity, and absolute temperature, respectively.
High thermoelectric efficiency requires high Seebeck coefficient simultaneously
with low electrical resistivity and thermal conductivity. However,
design of such materials is quite challenging because these parameters
are interdependent with electrically conducting materials having low
Seebeck coefficient and high thermal conductivity, and vice versa.Bulk nanostructured thermoelectric materials can be used to achieve
low phonon thermal conductivity, while retaining good electronic properties.[4−12] Nanoscale features with dimension comparable to the phonon mean
free path have been incorporated to preferentially scatter the phonons
to reduce thermal conductivity and thus enhance ZT. An alternative approach for selective scattering of phonons can
be the incorporation of nanopores with controlled size and periodicity.[2,3] The average mean free path of electrons in most materials is typically
1 order of magnitude lower than phonon mean free path. For example,
the mean free path of electrons in silicon (Si) is in the range 1–10
nm for heavily doped Si with carrier concentration of the order of
1 × 1019 cm–3, while the phonon
mean free path is 300 nm at 300 K.[13] Thus,
the reduction in thermal conductivity of nanoporous materials is possible
without adversely affecting electronic properties, by controlling
the characteristic length scale of the porous structure in the range
in-between electronic and phonon mean free path. For example, the
thermal conductivity of thin holey silicon with 55 nm pitch (periodicity
of pores) can be reduced by almost 2 orders of magnitude as compared
to the pristine bulk value, while retaining a high power factor, resulting
in enhanced ZT ≈ 0.4 at 300 K.[2] Others have reported drastic reduction of thermal conductivity
in Si-based 2D phononic crystals due to the suppression of phonon
mean free path;[14,15] however, with no report on their
electronic or thermoelectric properties.Ca3Co4O9 is a promising thermoelectric
material because of low cost, abundance, and nontoxicity of its constituent
raw materials. However, the best performance of this class of materials
typically occurs at high temperatures near 1000 K. Investigations
on bulk nanostructured Ca3Co4O9 have
not reported significant improvement of power factor near room temperature.[16−24] Because of the inherently layered structure, the electronic properties
of Ca3Co4O9 are anisotropic in nature,
and less resistive electronic transport is found to occur in (a, b)
plane of Ca3Co4O9. Thus, for achieving
high power factors in this material system, oriented thin films can
be used for exploitation of anisotropic properties. We have previously
demonstrated that the high power factor is retained down to near room
temperature in Ca3Co4O9 thin films
on sapphire substrates.[25] There have been
extensive investigations on thin film growth of Ca3Co4O9 thin films.[26−29] However, nanoporous Ca3Co4O9 thin films remain unexplored.Here,
we report a method for the growth of nanoporous Ca3Co4O9 thin films. The method requires neither
templates nor etching steps like previous reports on the growth of
thin nanoporous films.[2,3,30] Thermoelectric
properties of the films are characterized in terms of their power
factors. A retained high power factor near room temperature is important
for mechanically flexible applications, where the output power is
more important than the efficiency. For high output power, a high
power factor is more important than achieving high ZT.[31] Even with large number of pores, a
high power factor of 2.32 × 10–4 W m–1 K–2 is obtained near room temperature from undoped
nanoporous Ca3Co4O9 thin films. Furthermore,
the nanoporous films are transferable onto other arbitrary flexible
platforms by mechanical stripping, thus opening a new opportunity
for transferable thermoelectrics.
Experimental Section
Nanoporous Ca3Co4O9 thin films
were prepared by a two-step sputtering/annealing method. First, CaO/CoO
films were sequentially deposited by rf-magnetron reactive sputtering
from metallic targets of Ca and Co onto muscovitemica (00l) and sapphire (00l) substrates at 0.27
Pa (2 mTorr) in an oxygen–argon mixture with oxygen 0.5%, while
maintaining the substrate temperature at 300 °C for sapphire
substrates and 600 °C for mica substrates. The target powers
were controlled to maintain deposition rate of 5.5 nm/min for CaO
and 4.5 nm/min for CoO. In second step the as-deposited CaO/CoO films
were annealed at 700 °C in O2 gas flow to form the
final phase of Ca3Co4O9. The crystal
structure and morphology of the films were characterized by θ–2θ
X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses using monochromatic Cu Kα radiation
(λ = 1.5406 Å), transmission electron microscopy by using
a FEI Tecnai G2 TF20 UT instrument with a field emission gun operated
at 200 kV and with a point resolution of 1.9 Å, and scanning
electron microscopy (SEM, LEO 1550 Gemini). The θ–2θ
XRD scans were performed with a Philips PW 1820 diffractometer. For
cross-sectional TEM, two pieces of the samples were glued together
face to face and clamped with a Ti grid and then polished down to
50 μm thickness. Finally, the polished sample was ion milled
in a Gatan Precision Ion Polishing System (PIPS) at Ar+ energy of 5 kV and a gun angle of 5°, with a final polishing
step with 2 kV Ar+ energy. The composition of the films
was determined by EDS attached to TEM, with an accuracy ±5%.
The temperature dependent in-plane electrical resistivity and Seebeck
coefficient were simultaneously characterized using an ULVAC-RIKO
ZEM3 system in a low-pressure helium atmosphere. The available surface
area of the films was measured by Kr-sorption at 77 K using an ASAP2020.
The samples, i.e., film on a substrate, were degassed at 100 °C
for 17 h prior to the measurements. The BET surface area was determined
at P/P0 = 0.12–0.20.
The BET surface was recalculated to available surface area/film volume
using the following equation:where the film
thickness was estimated from
TEM, and the area of the film-coated substrate was determined by optical
imaging. It was assumed that all contribution to the specific surface
area originated from the films since the reference measurements on
bare substrates did not provide any measurable value.
Results and Discussion
Figure a is a scheme
of sequentially deposited CaO/CoO films with two different periodicities
of the layers. Four samples, namely SAl2O3: 5.5/4.5, Smica: 5.5/4.5, SAl2O3: 11/9, and Smica: 11/9, have been deposited. The films are named after the type of
substrates and thickness of individual CaO and CoO layers in the as-deposited
films. For example, SAl2O3: 5.5/4.5 and Smica: 5.5/4.5 films were deposited on sapphire Al2O3(001) and mica (muscovitemica (00l)) substrates,
respectively, and the thicknesses of sequential CaO and CoO layers
are 5.5 and 4.5 nm, respectively. In SAl2O3: 11/9 and Smica: 11/9, the thicknesses of CaO and CoO layers are 11 and
9 nm, respectively.
Figure 1
(a) Schematic representation of sequential CaO/CoO films
with periodicities
10 and 20 nm, (b) cross-sectional TEM image of as-deposited films
SAl2O3: 5.5/4.5 and SAl2O3: 11/9 on sapphire
substrate, (c) EDS mapping of the layered structure of the films,
(d, e) magnified image of small portion of the cross-section of the
films.
(a) Schematic representation of sequential CaO/CoO films
with periodicities
10 and 20 nm, (b) cross-sectional TEM image of as-deposited films
SAl2O3: 5.5/4.5 and SAl2O3: 11/9 on sapphire
substrate, (c) EDS mapping of the layered structure of the films,
(d, e) magnified image of small portion of the cross-section of the
films.Figure b shows
a cross-sectional transmission electron microscopic (TEM) image of
as-deposited CaO/CoO films SAl2O3: 5.5/4.5 and SAl2O3: 11/9, respectively. Figure c shows an EDS map of a small portion of the as-deposited
films SAl2O3: 5.5/4.5 and SAl2O3: 11/9. EDS
mapping confirms that the dark lines in Figure b are from CoO phase, and bright lines are
from CaO phase. Figure d, e show magnified images of small portions of the as-deposited
films SAl2O3: 5.5/4.5 and SAl2O3: 11/9, respectively.
In the as-deposited film SAl2O3: 5.5/4.5 the period is
10 nm (i.e., 5.5 nm + 4.5 nm) and with 20 alternating layers. The
total thickness of the film is 100 nm. In the as-deposited film SAl2O3: 11/9 the period is 20 nm and with 20 alternating layers.
The total thickness of the film is 200 nm. The layered structure of
as-deposited films on the two different substrates are very similar
(not shown here).Figure a shows
θ–2θ XRD scans of the as-deposited films SAl2O3: 5.5/4.5 and SAl2O3: 11/9. In Figure a, the XRD peaks at 2θ
angles 32.37°, 36.55° are from the (111) planes of CaO and
CoO, respectively, which is consistent with our previous observations
on cosputtered CaO–CoO thin film deposited on sapphire substrate.[25]Figure b shows the corresponding XRD scans for the as-deposited films
on mica. In Figure b, the CoO peak is not visible as it coincides with the (004) peak
of mica. Broad peaks at around 8.82, 17.81, 36.02, and 45.42°
originate from (00l) planes of the mica substrate. Figure c shows an XRD scan
of annealed films SAl2O3: 5.5/4.5 and SAl2O3: 11/9. Peaks from (00l)-planes of Al2O3 are visible in Figure c for both films. Apart from XRD peaks from (00l) planes of Ca3Co4O9,
a small peak of CaO at 2θ angle 32.37° is visible for both
films, which can be attributed to a slight Ca overstoichiometry in
the films. Figure d shows the corresponding XRD scans of annealed films on mica. Peaks
from (00l)-planes of Ca3Co4O9 are clearly visible in Figure d for both the films Smica: 5.5/4.5
and Smica: 11/9. Apart from Ca3Co4O9, the broad peaks from mica substrate are visible in Figure d. However, no peak
of CaO is seen which indicating the phase purity of the film. The d-spacings of the annealed Ca3Co4O9 films SAl2O3: 5.5/4.5, SAl2O3: 11/9,
Smica: 5.5/4.5, and Smica: 11/9 are calculated
to be 10.7218, 10.7297, 10.7404, and 10.7337 Å, respectively,
which are consistent with the reported d-spacing
for Ca3Co4O9 single crystal.[32] The corresponding out-of-plane lattice parameters
(c-parameter) are 10.8306, 10.8386, 10.8494, and
10.8426 Å for SAl2O3: 5.5/4.5, SAl2O3:
11/9, Smica: 5.5/4.5, and Smica: 11/9, respectively,
and consistent with the reported c-parameter of bulk
Ca3Co4O9.[33]
Figure 2
θ–
2θ XRD scan of (a) as-deposited films SAl2O3: 5.5/4.5
and SAl2O3: 11/9 on sapphire substrates,
(b) as-deposited films Smica: 5.5/4.5 and Smica: 11/9 on mica substrates, (c) postannealed films SAl2O3: 5.5/4.5 and SAl2O3: 11/9 on sapphire substrates, (d)
postannealed films Smica: 5.5/4.5 and Smica:
11/9 on mica substrates.
θ–
2θ XRD scan of (a) as-deposited films SAl2O3: 5.5/4.5
and SAl2O3: 11/9 on sapphire substrates,
(b) as-deposited films Smica: 5.5/4.5 and Smica: 11/9 on mica substrates, (c) postannealed films SAl2O3: 5.5/4.5 and SAl2O3: 11/9 on sapphire substrates, (d)
postannealed films Smica: 5.5/4.5 and Smica:
11/9 on mica substrates.From the above results, it is clear that the final phase
of Ca3Co4O9 is obtained from all
sequentially
deposited CaO/CoO films irrespective of substrate. During annealing,
a three-stage phase transformation from sequential CaO/CoO films to
the final phase of Ca3Co4O9 occurs,
as shown by our previous study on cosputtered CaO-CoO thin films on
sapphire substrates.[25] All annealed Ca3Co4O9 films are c-axis-oriented
irrespective of substrate. The advantage of mica as substrate is that
even with excess Ca in the as-deposited films, the postannealed Ca3Co4O9 films on mica substrates are phase-pure.
In this case, excess Ca is incorporated in an amorphous interfacial
layer between the mica substrate and the film (this is discussed later
in detail).Figures a–d
show SEM images of the annealed films SAl2O3: 5.5/4.5,
SAl2O3: 11/9, Smica: 5.5/4.5, and Smica: 11/9, respectively. The presence of horizontal grains with dimension
of several hundred nanometers in the postannealed film SAl2O3: 5.5/4.5 is seen in Figure a. Visible bright spots on the film surface are from grains
of different orientation. These grains are not observed in XRD, since
they do not satisfy Bragg’s condition in the out-of-plane direction,
which is consistent with previous observations for the Ca3Co4O9 films grown on SrTiO3(111)27 and on muscovitemica.[34] In contradiction,
SEM of the postannealed film SAl2O3: 11/9 does not show
the presence of any of these grains (see Figure b), which is also confirmed by TEM image
analyses (discussed later). The surface of the film SAl2O3: 11/9 is relatively smoother than the surface of the film SAl2O3: 5.5/4.5. The visible black spots on the surface of the
film SAl2O3: 11/9 are from randomly distributed pores in
the film having dimension in the range from few nanometers to several
hundred nanometers. Nanopores in the annealed film Smica: 5.5/4.5 are irregular in shape, but distributed rather homogeneously
in the film. The nanopores in the film Smica: 11/9 are
polygonal in shape, and having dimension in the range from a few tens
of nanometers to several hundred nanometers. The nanopores in the
film Smica: 11/9 have visible openings with sharp edges,
in contrast to the film SAl2O3: 11/9.
Figure 3
SEM image of postannealed
film (a) SAl2O3: 5.5/4.5 and
(b) SAl2O3: 11/9 on sapphire substrate, and (c) Smica: 5.5/4.5 and (d) Smica: 11/9 on mica substrate.
SEM image of postannealed
film (a) SAl2O3: 5.5/4.5 and
(b) SAl2O3: 11/9 on sapphire substrate, and (c) Smica: 5.5/4.5 and (d) Smica: 11/9 on mica substrate.It is clear from Figure that the porosity varies from
film to film. The porosity
of the films is compared in terms of their available surface area
per unit volume, where a high available surface indicates a large
porosity since the pore sizes in all films are in the same range.
The available surface areas of the films per unit volume are calculated
to be 0.11, 0.68, and 0.26 m2/mm3 for the films
SAl2O3: 11/9, Smica: 5.5/4.5, and Smica: 11/9, respectively. The highest value of available surface area
per unit volume of the film Smica: 5.5/4.5 is attributed
to its higher porosity than the rest films. On the other hand, the
lowest value of available surface area per unit volume of the film
SAl2O3: 11/9 is due to its low porosity, which is consistent
with the SEM observations. The distinct variation of the surface morphology
and porosity of the films on different substrates indicates the difference
in substrate influence on thin film growth of nanoporous Ca3Co4O9.Figure a shows
a cross-sectional TEM image of the annealed film SAl2O3: 11/9. The bright spot in Figure a is a void because of a pore in the film. Figure b shows a magnified
image of a small region, where the layered structure of Ca3Co4O9 and its orientation along c-axis is apparent. The average thickness of this film is 160 nm,
a reduction by nearly 20% compared to the as-deposited film. A similar
reduction in thickness was observed for the film SAl2O3: 5.5/4.5 after annealing, with a final thickness of 80 nm. The presence
of voids at the interface between the substrate and the annealed film
SAl2O3: 11/9 is confirmed by TEM imaging (Figure c).
Figure 4
(a) Cross-sectional TEM
image of postannealed film SAl2O3: 11/9 on sapphire substrate,
(b) magnified image of a small portion
of the postannealed film SAl2O3: 11/9, (c) void space at
the interfacial region of Ca3Co4O9 film.
(a) Cross-sectional TEM
image of postannealed film SAl2O3: 11/9 on sapphire substrate,
(b) magnified image of a small portion
of the postannealed film SAl2O3: 11/9, (c) void space at
the interfacial region of Ca3Co4O9 film.Figure a shows
a cross-sectional TEM image of the annealed film Smica:
11/9. The average thickness of the Smica: 11/9 film is
∼150 nm, which is 10 nm lower than the thickness of corresponding
annealed film on sapphire. This reduction in film thickness is attributed
to the incorporation of excess Ca in an amorphous interfacial layer,
as confirmed by EDS analyses (see below), which is consistent with
our previous observation on the growth of flexible Ca3Co4O9 films on mica substrates.[34] In Figure a, voids are visible throughout the interfacial region of the annealed
film on mica, in contrast to corresponding film on sapphire. As a
consequence, Ca3Co4O9 film is weakly
bonded to the mica substrate via nanopillars. Figure b shows a magnified image showing that the
film is supported by nanopillars on the mica substrate. The interfacial
layer between the film and mica substrate is amorphous in nature,
and by EDS analyses the amorphous layer is determined to be Ca-rich
(Ca: 31.3 at %). This is because the excess Ca in the film is incorporated
in the amorphous layer. The other elements: O (48.8 at %), Al (6.8
at %), Si (8.5 at %), K (0.9 at %), and Fe (3.7 at %) in the amorphous
layer retain the same proportion as that in the mica substrate. Figure c shows the HRTEM
image of a nanopillar of width of around 25 nm. The layered structure
of the Ca3Co4O9 phase in the nanopillar
is visible.
Figure 5
(a) Cross-sectional TEM image of postannealed film Smica: 11/9 on mica substrate, (b) magnified image of a small portion
of the film Smica: 11/9, (c) magnified image of a nanopillar
of width 25 nm.
(a) Cross-sectional TEM image of postannealed film Smica: 11/9 on mica substrate, (b) magnified image of a small portion
of the film Smica: 11/9, (c) magnified image of a nanopillar
of width 25 nm.From the above SEM and
TEM results, it is clear that the mica and
sapphire substrates affect the growth of Ca3Co4O9 thin films differently, leading to variations in the
resulting nanoporous structures. The formation of nanopores in the
films is likely caused by the volume contraction of the films after
annealing. As mentioned before, the thickness of the annealed films
is reduced by around 20% as compared to the as-deposited CaO/CoO films.
This volume contraction is due to the increase in density of the films
after thermally induced phase transformation. This densification develops
compressive stress in the films. As a consequence, the films are subjected
through the formation of nanopores for releasing stress. Mica is likely
more favorable than sapphire for such stress release because of weaker
adhesion of the film with mica.
Transferability
of the Films
The transferability of the nanoporous films
was investigated by
transferring the nanoporous film Smica: 11/9 on to polydimethylsiloxane
(PDMS) platform. The different stages of the transfer process are
illustrated in Figure . Initially, the mica substrate is isolated from the film following
the steps as shown in Figure a–d. First, a glass slide is coated with a thin layer
of wax. In the next step, the film is attached to the glass slide
upside down, and then the thickness of the mica substrate is reduced
to below 20 μm by isolating the mica layers from the back by
mechanical force (Figure b). For further thickness reduction, thin layers of mica are
repeatedly removed by adhesive tape as shown in Figure c. Figure d shows the back surface of the film after the complete
removal of mica. After the removal of mica, no cracks in the film
were observed by optical microscopy. After that, the back surface
of the film is coated with a thin layer of PDMS following the step
in Figure e. In the
next step, the coated film was heated to 80 °C for 3 h for the
solidification of PDMS layer. The small area of the coated layer is
isolated from the rest using a blade (Figure f). This is followed by heating to 150 °C
to melt the thin layer of wax between the glass slide and the PDMS
layer. Then, the PDMS layer is isolated from glass slide as shown
in Figure g. To dissolve
the wax, the transferred film is immersed in acetone for 10 min. Figure h, I show the images
of the film after transfer onto PDMS.
Figure 6
(a–i) Different steps of film transfer
from primary mica
substrate to the final platform of PDMS.
(a–i) Different steps of film transfer
from primary mica
substrate to the final platform of PDMS.Several strategies, e.g., surface-energy-assisted transfer,[35] water penetration- assisted mechanical transfer,[36] film transfer by using ultrasonic water bath,[37] and carrier-polymer-assisted transfer,[38] have been demonstrated to transfer the 2D metal
sulfide onto flexible polymer platforms. However, reports on transfer
of thick films are less common, a notable exception being the work
of Lu et al. on the transfer of thick films by etching of sacrificial
water-soluble layers.[39] The present study
is important as it demonstrates an alternative method for the damage
free dry transfer of thick nanoporous films.
Thermoelectric
Properties
Figure a shows
the temperature-dependent electrical resistivity of all films from
room temperature to 400 °C. The room-temperature electrical resistivity
of the films SAl2O3: 5.5/4.5, SAl2O3: 11/9,
Smica: 5.5/4.5, and Smica: 11/9 is measured
to be ∼32, 13, 25, and 7 mΩcm, respectively. No significant
variation of electrical resistivity with temperature is observed for
all the films until 250 °C, however above 250 °C sharp increase
in electrical resistivity is clearly visible in Figure a. This sharp increase in electrical resistivity
is attributed to the release of oxygen from the film above 250 °C,
because the measurements are performed in vacuum. This is consistent
with the observations on thin films reported elsewhere.[25,34,40,41] Despite the higher porosity of the film Smica: 11/9 than
the Smica: 5.5/4.5, the former offers the lowest electrical
resistivity throughout the temperature range measured. This indicates
that the presence of nanopores in the film Smica: 11/9
does not hamper the transport of charge carriers. The scattering of
charge carriers can be avoided in the nanoporous films if the characteristic
length-scale of the porous structure is lower than the electronic
mean free path, and this is supposed to be the case with the film
Smica: 11/9. The room temperature value of electrical resistivity
of the film Smica: 11/9 is as low as that is comparable
to the values reported for solid thin films,[26−29] and lower than the values reported
for bulk polycrystalline Ca3Co4O9.[20−24,42] The electrical resistivity of
the film Smica: 5.5/4.5 is more than three times larger
than that of the film SAl2O3: 11/9, which is attributed
to its higher porosity. With the increase in porosity, the characteristic
length scale of the nanoporous structure in the film Smica: 5.5/4.5 might have been reduced below the electronic mean free
path, resulting in enhanced scattering of charge carriers. That is,
nanopores in the film Smica: 5.5/4.5 strongly scatter the
charge carriers leading to the increase in electrical resistivity.
Even with lower porosity, the electrical resistivity of the film SAl2O3: 11/9 is nearly half that of the film Smica: 5.5/4.5; however, it is almost twice that of the film Smica: 11/9. This indicates that the quality of the films on mica substrates
is better than that of the films on sapphire substrates. The highest
electrical resistivity of the film SAl2O3: 5.5/4.5 is due
to the presence of disoriented grains in the film, which acts as scattering
center for charge carriers.
Figure 7
Temperature-dependent (a) electrical resistivity,
(b) Seebeck coefficient,
(c) power factor of the films.
Temperature-dependent (a) electrical resistivity,
(b) Seebeck coefficient,
(c) power factor of the films.Figure b
shows
the temperature-dependent Seebeck coefficient of all the films from
room temperature to 400 °C. Near room temperature, the Seebeck
coefficient of the films SAl2O3: 5.5/4.5, SAl2O3: 11/9, Smica: 5.5/4.5, and Smica: 11/9, is
measured to be around 129, 115, 129, and133 μV/K, respectively.
No significant variation in Seebeck coefficient with temperature of
all the films is observed until 250 °C; however, beyond this
temperature it increases rapidly following the same manner as electrical
resistivity. No considerable variation in Seebeck coefficient from
film to film is observed, except a slightly lower value of the near-room-temperature
Seebeck coefficient of the film SAl2O3: 11/9. This shows
that the porosity does not have significant effect on Seebeck coefficient
of the films.Figure c shows
the temperature-dependent power factor of all the films. Because of
the lowest electrical resistivity and fairly good Seebeck coefficient
the film Smica: 11/9 exhibits the highest power factor,
above 2 × 10–4 W m–1 K–2 in a wide temperature range (from room temperature
to 350 °C), and achieving the highest value 2.83 × 10–4 W m–1 K–2 near
300 °C. Although the values of power factor above 150 °C
are lower than the best reported values of power factor for undoped
Ca3Co4O9 thin films,[29,43] the room-temperature value (2.32 × 10–4 W
m–1 K–2) is comparable to previous
reports on undoped Ca3Co4O9 thin
films,[28,44,45] and undoped
bulk polycrystalline Ca3Co4O9.[22,24,42] The power factor of the film
Smica: 5.5/4.5 is almost three times lower than that of
the film Smica: 11/9 throughout the temperature range measured,
which is attributed to its higher porosity. A difference of the films
grown on mica substrates than that of the films grown on the sapphire
substrates is that the power factors in the former case are less temperature-dependent.The above results show that the power factor of the films on mica
substrates is different depending on the porosity of the films, in
contrast to the films on sapphire substrates. This is because, with
the increase in porosity the average distance between the pores decreases,
resulting in a reduction in electronic mean free path. Because the
pores in the film Smica: 5.5/4.5 are not of regular shape,
the average separation of the pores cannot be readily estimated, but
should be comparable to the electronic mean free path, resulting in
a drastic increase in electrical resistivity. Furthermore, the pores
in Smica: 5.5/4.5 seem to form a networklike structure,
which restricts the passage of charge carriers, leading to the increased
electrical resistivity. On the other hand, the interpore separation
in the film Smica: 11/9 have a distribution in the range
50–500 nm, that is characteristic length scale of the nanoporous
structure is higher than electronic mean free path, resulting in the
reduced electrical resistivity and thus enhanced power factor of the
film. The electronic mean free path in the most materials is less
than 10 nm.[46] Recently, high power factor
simultaneously with reduced thermal conductivity have been realized
in thin films with ordered pores/holes;[2,3] however, there
has been no report on the power factor of the films with disordered
pores. The present work thus reveals that the scattering of charge
carriers can be avoided in the nanoporous film with disordered pores
by controlling the porosity, and thus a high power factor is possible.
On the other hand, because of the presence of a large number of pores
the thermal conductivity of the film is expected to be reduced. Because
of the irregular shape and size and random distribution of nanopores,
the direct evaluation of in-plane thermal conductivity of the nanoporous
film is not possible. Recently, Kashiwagi et al. theoretically derived
in-plane thermal conductivity of the nanoporous Bi0.4Te3Sb1.6 thin film from its measured cross-plane value
by considering the cutoff mean free path to be equal to the average
pore spacing.[30] The estimation of average
pore spacing in nanoporous Ca3Co4O9 films is challenging as due to the irregular shape and size and
random distribution of nanopores. However, reduction in cross-plane
thermal conductivity by 1 order of magnitude was realized by Song
et al. in nanoporous Bi thin films with random nanopores.[47] The effect of porosity on thermal conductivity
of bulk Ca3Co4O9 is also investigated,[48,49] and thermal conductivity of 0.63 W m–1 K–1 at 373 K is reported by Bittner et al. for ∼32% porous Ca3Co4O9.[48] Note
that the present Ca3Co4O9 films are
undoped, and yet a high power factor 2.32 × 10–4 W m–1 K–2 near room temperature
is obtained from the film Smica: 11/9. Further enhancement
of the power factor is still possible by doping.[18,50−52] With this power factor combined with transferability,
the nanoporous Ca3Co4O9 films are
candidates for near-room-temperature thermoelectric applications.
Conclusion
A sequential sputtering-annealing method,
for the growth of nanoporous
and transferable Ca3Co4O9 films,
has been demonstrated. The volume contraction caused by densification
during the thermally induced phase transformation from sequential
CaO/CoO film to the final phase of Ca3Co4O9 promotes the formation of nanopores in the film. The porosity
of the films is tunable by controlling the thickness of sequential
CaO and CoO layers in the initial sputtered deposited films. A high
power factor, above 2 × 10–4 W m–1 K–2 in a wide temperature range (from room temperature
to 350 °C), is obtained from the nanoporus film on mica substrate.
Because of the weak bonding of the film with the mica substrate and
the presence of nanopillars, the film is easy transferable from the
primary mica substrate onto polymer platforms. With this transferability
and high power factor, the nanoprous Ca3Co4O9 films can be a candidate for near-room-temperature thermoelectric
applications. Additionally, the film growth method is suitable for
upscaling.
Authors: Di Lu; David J Baek; Seung Sae Hong; Lena F Kourkoutis; Yasuyuki Hikita; Harold Y Hwang Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2016-09-12 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: Markus R Wagner; Bartlomiej Graczykowski; Juan Sebastian Reparaz; Alexandros El Sachat; Marianna Sledzinska; Francesc Alzina; Clivia M Sotomayor Torres Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2016-09-02 Impact factor: 11.189