Literature DB >> 29904991

The colorectal surgeon's personality may influence the rectal anastomotic decision.

S J Moug1,2, N Henderson3, J Tiernan4, C N Bisset1, E Ferguson5, D Harji6, C Maxwell-Armstrong7, E MacDermid8, A G Acheson9, R J C Steele10, N S Fearnhead11.   

Abstract

AIM: Colorectal surgeons regularly make the decision to anastomose, defunction or form an end colostomy when performing rectal surgery. This study aimed to define personality traits of colorectal surgeons and explore any influence of such traits on the decision to perform a rectal anastomosis.
METHOD: Fifty attendees of The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland 2016 Conference participated. After written consent, all underwent personality testing: alexithymia (inability to understand emotions), type of thinking process (intuitive versus rational) and personality traits (extraversion, agreeableness, openness, emotional stability, conscientiousness). Questions were answered regarding anastomotic decisions in various clinical scenarios and results analysed to reveal any influence of the surgeon's personality on anastomotic decision.
RESULTS: Participants were: male (86%), consultants (84%) and based in England (68%). Alexithymia was low (4%) with 81% displaying intuitive thinking (reflex, fast). Participants scored higher in emotional stability (ability to remain calm) and conscientiousness (organized, methodical) compared with population norms. Personality traits influenced the next anastomotic decision if: surgeons had recently received criticism at a departmental audit meeting; were operating with an anaesthetist that was not their regular one; or there had been no anastomotic leaks in their patients for over 1 year.
CONCLUSION: Colorectal surgeons have speciality relevant personalities that potentially influence the important decision to anastomose and could explain the variation in surgical practice across the UK. Future work should explore these findings in other countries and any link of personality traits to patient-related outcomes.
© 2018 The Authors. Colorectal Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rectal anastomosis; decision-making; surgeon personality

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29904991     DOI: 10.1111/codi.14293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  7 in total

1.  Development of a Risk Score to Predict Anastomotic Leak After Left-Sided Colectomy: Which Patients Warrant Diversion?

Authors:  Nicholas P McKenna; Katherine A Bews; Robert R Cima; Cynthia S Crowson; Elizabeth B Habermann
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  The Importance of Incorporating Human Factors in the Design and Implementation of Artificial Intelligence for Skin Cancer Diagnosis in the Real World.

Authors:  Claire M Felmingham; Nikki R Adler; Zongyuan Ge; Rachael L Morton; Monika Janda; Victoria J Mar
Journal:  Am J Clin Dermatol       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 7.403

3.  Shared decision making: Does a physician's decision-making style affect patient participation in treatment choices for primary immunodeficiency?

Authors:  Christopher C Lamb; Yunmei Wang; Kalle Lyytinen
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 2.431

4.  Systematic review protocol examining the influence of surgeon personality on perioperative decision making in abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Carly Nichola Bisset; Tracey McKee; Elliot Tilling; Mary Cawley; Susan Moug
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  A Systematic Review of the Abdominal Surgeon's Personality: Exploring Common Traits in Western Populations.

Authors:  Carly Nichola Bisset; Tracey McKee; Mary Cawley; Elliot Tilling; Susan Joan Moug
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-26

6.  Advanced undergraduate medical students' perceptions of basic medical competences and specific competences for different medical specialties - a qualitative study.

Authors:  Elena Zelesniack; Viktor Oubaid; Sigrid Harendza
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.263

7.  UK vs US physician decision-making in the treatment of haemophilia.

Authors:  Christopher C Lamb; Adrian Wolfberg; Kalle Lyytinen
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2019-05-05       Impact factor: 4.287

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.