| Literature DB >> 29904978 |
E Heffler1,2, M Landi3,4, C Caruso5, S Fichera6, F Gani7, G Guida8, M T Liuzzo6, M P Pistorio6, S Pizzimenti9, A M Riccio10, V Seccia11, M Ferrando1,10, L Malvezzi12, G Passalacqua10, M Gelardi13.
Abstract
Nasal cytology is an easy, cheap, non-invasive and point-of-care method to assess nasal inflammation and disease-specific cellular features. By means of nasal cytology, it is possible to distinguish between different inflammatory patterns that are typically associated with specific diseases (ie, allergic and non-allergic rhinitis). Its use is particularly relevant when other clinical information, such as signs, symptoms, time-course and allergic sensitizations, is not enough to recognize which of the different rhinitis phenotypes is involved; for example, it is only by means of nasal cytology that it is possible to distinguish, among the non-allergic rhinitis, those characterized by eosinophilic (NARES), mast cellular (NARMA), mixed eosinophilic-mast cellular (NARESMA) or neutrophilic (NARNE) inflammation. Despite its clinical usefulness, cheapness, non-invasiveness and easiness, nasal cytology is still underused and this is at least partially due to the fact that, as far as now, there is not a consensus or an official recommendation on its methodological issues. We here review the scientific literature about nasal cytology, giving recommendations on how to perform and interpret nasal cytology.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29904978 DOI: 10.1111/cea.13207
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Exp Allergy ISSN: 0954-7894 Impact factor: 5.018