Literature DB >> 29904927

Mesenchymal stromal cells from amniotic fluid are less prone to senescence compared to those obtained from bone marrow: An in vitro study.

Nicola Alessio1, Caterina Pipino2, Domitilla Mandatori3, Pamela Di Tomo3, Angela Ferone1, Marco Marchiso3, Mariarosa A B Melone4,5, Gianfranco Peluso6, Assunta Pandolfi2, Umberto Galderisi1,5.   

Abstract

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are considered to be an excellent source in regenerative medicine. They contain several cell subtypes, including multipotent stem cells. MSCs are of particular interest as they are currently being tested using cell and gene therapies for a number of human diseases. They represent a rare population in tissues; for this reason, they require, before being transplanted, an in vitro amplification. This process may induce replicative senescence, thus affecting differentiation and proliferative capacities. Increasing evidence suggests that MSCs from fetal tissues are significantly more plastic and grow faster than MSCs from bone marrow. Here, we compare amniotic fluid mesenchymal stromal cells (AF-MSCs) and bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSCs) in terms of cell proliferation, surface markers, multidifferentiation potential, senescence, and DNA repair capacity. Our study shows that AF-MSCs are less prone to senescence with respect to BM-MSCs. Moreover, both cell models activate the same repair system after DNA damage, but AF-MSCs are able to return to the basal condition more efficiently with respect to BM-MSCs. Indeed, AF-MSCs are better able to cope with genotoxic stress that may occur either during in vitro cultivation or following transplantation in patients. Our findings suggest that AF-MSCs may represent a valid alternative to BM-MSCs in regenerative medicine, and, of great relevance, the investigation of the mechanisms involved in DNA repair capacity of both AF-MSCs and BM-MSCs may pave the way to their rational use in the medical field.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA repair; amniotic fluid; bone marrow (BM); mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs); senescence

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29904927     DOI: 10.1002/jcp.26845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Physiol        ISSN: 0021-9541            Impact factor:   6.384


  14 in total

1.  Human amniotic fluid stem cells attract osteoprogenitor cells in bone healing.

Authors:  Mariangela Basile; Francesco Marchegiani; Sanja Novak; Ivo Kalajzic; Roberta Di Pietro
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 6.384

2.  A rapid, safe, and quantitative in vitro assay for measurement of uracil-DNA glycosylase activity.

Authors:  Tiziana Squillaro; Mauro Finicelli; Nicola Alessio; Stefania Del Gaudio; Giovanni Di Bernardo; Mariarosa Anna Beatrice Melone; Gianfranco Peluso; Umberto Galderisi
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 3.  Exosome: A New Player in Translational Nanomedicine.

Authors:  Houssam Aheget; María Tristán-Manzano; Loubna Mazini; Marina Cortijo-Gutierrez; Pablo Galindo-Moreno; Concha Herrera; Francisco Martin; Juan Antonio Marchal; Karim Benabdellah
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-07-26       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 4.  Human menstrual blood: a renewable and sustainable source of stem cells for regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Haining Lv; Yali Hu; Zhanfeng Cui; Huidong Jia
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 6.832

Review 5.  Stem cell therapy in autism: recent insights.

Authors:  Dario Siniscalco; Suresh Kannan; Neomar Semprún-Hernández; Adrien A Eshraghi; Anna Lisa Brigida; Nicola Antonucci
Journal:  Stem Cells Cloning       Date:  2018-10-23

6.  Colchicine causes prenatal cell toxicity and increases tetraploid risk.

Authors:  Ding Wang; Yingjun Xie; Minyi Yan; Qianying Pan; Yi Liang; Xiaofang Sun
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 2.483

7.  Metabolic Profile and Neurogenic Potential of Human Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells From Normal vs. Fetus-Affected Gestations.

Authors:  Giedrė Valiulienė; Aistė Zentelytė; Elizabet Beržanskytė; Rūta Navakauskienė
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-07-16

8.  Different culture method changing CD105 expression in amniotic fluid MSCs without affecting differentiation ability or immune function.

Authors:  Ding Wang; Nengqing Liu; Yingjun Xie; Bing Song; Shu Kong; Xiaofang Sun
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 5.310

9.  Low-Level Radiofrequency Exposure Does Not Induce Changes in MSC Biology: An in vitro Study for the Prevention of NIR-Related Damage.

Authors:  Nicola Alessio; Elisa Santoro; Tiziana Squillaro; Domenico Aprile; Massimo Briccola; Paolo Giubbini; Raffaella Marchesani; Maria Rosaria Muoio; Monica Lamberti
Journal:  Stem Cells Cloning       Date:  2019-12-18

10.  The Effect of Angiotensin II, Retinoic Acid, EGCG, and Vitamin C on the Cardiomyogenic Differentiation Induction of Human Amniotic Fluid-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Authors:  Monika Gasiūnienė; Elvina Valatkaitė; Aistė Navakauskaitė; Rūta Navakauskienė
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 6.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.