| Literature DB >> 29904896 |
Wenyao Yang1,2,3, Yan Chen4, Jingfeng Wang1, Tianjun Peng5, Jianhua Xu5, Bangchao Yang5, Ke Tang6,7.
Abstract
We demonstrate an electrochemical reduction method to reduce graphene oxide (GO) to electrochemically reduced graphene oxide (ERGO) with the assistance of carbon nanotubes (CNTs). The faster and more efficient reduction of GO can be achieved after proper addition of CNTs into GO during the reduction process. This nanotube/nanosheet composite was deposited on electrode as active material for electrochemical energy storage applications. It has been found that the specific capacitance of the composite film was strongly affected by the mass ratio of GO/CNTs and the scanning ratio of cyclic voltammetry. The obtained ERGO/CNT composite electrode exhibited a 279.4 F/g-specific capacitance and showed good cycle rate performance with the evidence that the specific capacitance maintained above 90% after 6000 cycles. The synergistic effect between ERGO and CNTs as well as crossing over of CNTs into ERGO is attributed to the high electrochemical performance of composite electrode.Entities:
Keywords: Carbon nanotube; Electrochemical reduction; Nanocomposite material; Reduced graphene oxide; Specific capacitance
Year: 2018 PMID: 29904896 PMCID: PMC6002331 DOI: 10.1186/s11671-018-2582-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Res Lett ISSN: 1556-276X Impact factor: 4.703
Fig. 1SEM images of ERGO (a) and ERGO/CNTs obtained from GO/CNTs with different mass ratios: b GO/CNTs = 100:1, c GO/CNTs = 50:1, and d GO/CNTs = 10:1; the inset images in (b) are photo pictures of GO/CNTs before and after electrochemical reduction
Fig. 2FT-IR spectrum of GO and ERGO
Electrical conductivity of GO and GO/CNTs with different mass ratios before and after electrochemical reduction
| Film samples | GO | GO/CNTs (50:1) | GO/CNTs (10:1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conductivity before reduction | 23.5 MΩ/sq | 79.8 kΩ/sq | 47.8 kΩ/sq |
| Conductivity after reduction | 11.17 kΩ/sq | 8.35 kΩ/sq | 9.27 kΩ/sq |
Fig. 3a Raman spectra and b X-ray diffraction spectra of the pristine GO, ERGO, and ERGO/CNTs
Fig. 4Electrochemical reduction of a GO and b GO/CNTs (mass ratio 50:1) in 0.5 M Na2SO4 (pH 6.0) at a scan rate of 50 mV/s
Fig. 5Cycle voltammetry curves of ERGO and ERGO/CNTs with a different GO/CNTs mass ratio at 50 mV/s. (All films were prepared by CV at a scan rate of 50 mV/s)
Calculated specific capacitance of different electrodes (F/g)
| Samples (mass ratio of GO to CNTs) | Non-CNTs | 100:1 | 50:1 | 10:1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Specific capacitance | 156.3 | 178.1 | 279.4 | 203.5 |
Fig. 6Galvanostatic charge/discharge curves (a) and CV pattern (b) of the as-prepared film in 0.5 M Na2SO4 (pH 6.0) (mass ratio of 50:1 and scan rate of 50 mV/s)
Fig. 7Nyquist plots of different composite electrodes
Fig. 8Cycling rate performance of different electrodes at 1.2 A/g scan current density