Literature DB >> 29904752

Nine-year Clinical Performance of a HEMA-free One-step Self-etch Adhesive in Noncarious Cervical Lesions.

Marleen Peumans, Laura Wouters, Jan De Munck, Bart Van Meerbeek, Kirsten Van Landuyt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: One-step self-etch adhesives are among the most popular adhesives to directly bond composite to tooth tissue, mainly because of their perceived ease-of-use. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the clinical performance of a HEMA-free 1-step self-etch adhesive (1SEa), as compared with a 3-step etch-and-rinse adhesive (3E&Ra).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 267 non-carious cervical lesions in 52 patients were restored with a microhybrid composite Gradia Direct (GC), bonded in random order either with the HEMA-free 1SEa G-Bond (GB; GC) or the considered gold-standard 3E&Ra Optibond FL (OFL; Kerr). The restorations were evaluated after 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 5 and 9 years of clinical service for retention, marginal adaptation, marginal discoloration, caries occurrence and tooth sensitivity. Statistical analysis was done using a logistic regression model with generalized estimating equations (2-way GEE model).
RESULTS: The patient recall rate at 9 years was 82.6%. The overall clinical success rate was 80.3% and 79.5% for GB and OFL, respectively. In total, 47 restorations (23 GB, 24 OFL) failed because of retention loss, severe marginal defects and/or discoloration and/or caries. A similar retention rate of 89.7% was recorded for both adhesives GB and OFL. Slight marginal defects and superficial marginal discoloration, though both still clinically acceptable, were significantly more observed at the incisal enamel side of GB (92.4% and 52.1%, respectively) than OFL (59.6%; 30.8%) restorations (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: After 9 years of clinical service, class-V restorations bonded with the HEMA-free 1SEa performed clinically equally successful as those bonded with the 3E&amp;Ra. However, more marginal deterioration, though still clinically acceptable, was recorded at the incisal enamel side for the 1SEa.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Class V; RCT; adhesion; bonding; clinical effectiveness; randomized clinical trial

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29904752     DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a40630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adhes Dent        ISSN: 1461-5185            Impact factor:   2.359


  5 in total

1.  Clinical comparison of a micro-hybride resin-based composite and resin modified glass ionomer in the treatment of cervical caries lesions: 36-month, split-mouth, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Uzay Koc Vural; Leyla Kerimova; Arlin Kiremitci
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Eight-year clinical evaluation of two types of resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions.

Authors:  Kei Kaida; Shisei Kubo; Takafumi Egoshi; Yohsuke Taira
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 3.606

3.  Comparative Assessment of Different Pre-Treatment Bonding Strategies to Improve the Adhesion of Self-Adhesive Composites to Dentin.

Authors:  Magali Inglês; Joana Vasconcelos E Cruz; Ana Mano Azul; Mário Polido; António H S Delgado
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 4.967

4.  Influence of Different Composites and Polishing Techniques on Periodontal Tissues near Noncarious Cervical Lesions: A Controlled, Randomized, Blinded Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Nancielli Teixeira; Mariana Benedetti Ferreira Webber; Carlos Augusto Nassar; Veridiana Camilotti; Marcio José Mendonça; Mario Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2019-12-31

5.  Composite restorations placed in non-carious cervical lesions-Which cavity preparation is clinically reliable?

Authors:  Anne-Katrin Lührs; Silke Jacker-Guhr; Hüsamettin Günay; Peggy Herrmann
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2020-09-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.