| Literature DB >> 29904680 |
Adebanji S Ogbiye1, Olumuyiwa O Onakunle1,2, David O Omole1.
Abstract
The dataset analyzed in this article contains spatial and temporal values of the hydro-geometric parameters of River Atuwara. The hydro-geometrical data analyses of various sampling point on River Atuwara was examined and their geometric properties were taken with the use of a paddled boat, depth meter and global positioning system (GPS). The co-ordinates, width, depth, slopes, area, velocity, flow were gotten in-situ while the area and wetted perimeter were computed ex-situ. The statistical relationships between separate variables were considered using scatter plots and regression line equations. Inferences drawn from various variable comparisons can be used to validate predictive models for various time seasons.Entities:
Keywords: Atuwara River; Hydro-geometry; Particle transport modelling; Regression analysis; Water transport
Year: 2018 PMID: 29904680 PMCID: PMC5998175 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.04.071
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Fig. 3Hydro-geometric measurement on River Atuwara.
October, 2008 Atuwara Rivers field measured hydro-geometric parameters.
| 1 | 523883 | 745372 | STA | 0 | Atuara Upstream | 13.1 | 11.56 | 0.74 | 0.89 | 0.8 | 0.81 | 1.04 | 1.13 | 10.6 | 0.41 | 4.351 | 0.035 | 13.899 | 3.452 | 4.93 |
| 2 | STB | 0.19 | Abattoir | 4.3 | 2.85 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 1 | 1.05 | 3.18 | 0.43 | 1.368 | 0.035 | 4.956 | 4.048 | 4.722 | ||
| 3 | STC | 0.24 | Abattoir Downstream | 8.4 | 6.74 | 0.86 | 1.26 | 0.8 | 0.97 | 1.21 | 1.13 | 7.58 | 0.43 | 3.25 | 0.035 | 9.598 | 2.698 | 5.743 | ||
| 4 | STD | 1.21 | Sona Upstream | 16.2 | 14.23 | 0.89 | 2.25 | 1.08 | 1.41 | 1.26 | 1.53 | 22.84 | 0.42 | 9.594 | 0.035 | 18.594 | 1.521 | 8.79 | ||
| 5 | STE | 1.26 | Sona Discharge | 8.6 | 6.51 | 1.14 | 2.03 | 0.95 | 1.37 | 1.61 | 1.34 | 11.78 | 0.38 | 4.477 | 0.035 | 10.821 | 1.511 | 7.727 | ||
| 6 | STF | 2.78 | Ewupe Upstream | 10.4 | 7.96 | 0.99 | 2.53 | 1.45 | 1.66 | 1.4 | 2.05 | 17.26 | 0.38 | 6.56 | 0.035 | 13.441 | 1.133 | 9.362 | ||
| 7 | STG | 2.83 | Ewupe Discharge | 13.4 | 10.81 | 1.02 | 2.68 | 1.57 | 1.76 | 1.44 | 2.22 | 23.58 | 0.4 | 9.434 | 0.035 | 16.732 | 1.065 | 10.45 | ||
| 8 | STH | 3.08 | Ewupe Downstream | 13.5 | 11.56 | 1.02 | 2.59 | 0.92 | 1.51 | 1.44 | 1.3 | 20.38 | 0.39 | 7.95 | 0.004 | 16.209 | 1.323 | 8.741 | ||
| 9 | STJ | 4.67 | Afara Meje | 16.9 | 15.26 | 1.32 | 2.17 | 2.96 | 2.15 | 1.87 | 4.19 | 36.34 | 0.41 | 14.897 | 0.004 | 23.892 | 0.798 | 13.083 | ||
| 10 | STK | 7.94 | Ekusere | 11.8 | 8.23 | 2.34 | 2.71 | 1.23 | 2.09 | 3.31 | 1.74 | 24.66 | 0.34 | 8.385 | 0.004 | 16.078 | 0.758 | 10.547 | ||
| 11 | STL | 8.36 | Ekusere Down Stream | 8.9 | 6.53 | 1.51 | 2.56 | 0.86 | 1.64 | 2.13 | 1.22 | 14.6 | 0.36 | 5.255 | 0.004 | 11.895 | 1.123 | 8.764 | ||
| 12 | STM | 9.28 | Igboloye Upstream | 9.4 | 6.1 | 1.79 | 2.22 | 1.51 | 1.84 | 2.53 | 2.13 | 17.3 | 0.32 | 5.535 | 0.004 | 12.815 | 0.891 | 8.74 | ||
| 13 | STP | 9.88 | Igboloye Discharge | 10.2 | 6.87 | 2.25 | 2.06 | 1.08 | 1.8 | 3.18 | 1.53 | 18.38 | 0.28 | 5.141 | 0.004 | 13.464 | 0.861 | 7.481 | ||
| 14 | STQ | 9.88 | Igboloye 100 m Down Stream | 12.3 | 9.62 | 1.94 | 2.19 | 0.74 | 1.62 | 2.74 | 1.05 | 19.93 | 0.31 | 6.177 | 0.004 | 15.133 | 1.061 | 7.454 | ||
| 15 | STR | 10.71 | Igboloye 600 m Downstream | 11.2 | 7.35 | 3.45 | 1.79 | 0.4 | 1.88 | 4.88 | 0.57 | 21.06 | 0.29 | 6.106 | 0.004 | 14.607 | 0.821 | 8.092 | ||
| 16 | 516392 | 738497 | STS | 10.81 | Iju Water Works | 16.9 | 10.46 | 5.02 | 3.11 | 1.39 | 3.17 | 7.09 | 1.96 | 15.62 | 0.32 | 4.995 | 0.004 | 25.362 | 0.394 | 4.387 |
Fig. 4Velocity of River Atuwara against the area.
Fig. 5Oxygen reaeration of River Atuwara against the area.
Fig. 6Dispersion against the area of River Atuwara.
Fig. 2River Atuwara and the built-up areas.
Fig. 1Cross-section of the basin to calculate other parameters.
| Subject area | |
|---|---|
| More specific subject area | |
| Type of data | |
| How data was acquired | The referenced sampling points of the Atuwara river were taken with paddled boat and a depth finder. A global positioning system (GPS) unit was utilized to determine the location of the referenced points within the River Atuwara. |
| Data format | |
| Experimental factors | The study assumes that an irregular channel cross-sections can be represented with hydraulically equivalent (that is, area to wetted perimeter remains the same) trapezoidal cross-sections. Also, the processed hydro-geometric data assumes the top-width of each cross-section were unchanged. |
| Experimental features | |
| Data source location | |
| Data accessibility |