Mariano G Clausi1, Alexander M Stessin1,2, Stella E Tsirka2, Samuel Ryu3,4. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, USA. 2. Department of Pharmacological Sciences, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, USA. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, USA. samuel.ryu@stonybrookmedicine.edu. 4. Department of Pharmacological Sciences, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, USA. samuel.ryu@stonybrookmedicine.edu.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Experimental study. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor Ramipril, as a mitigator of radiation-induced spinal cord injury. SETTING: Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA. METHODS: Total of 22 rats were irradiated with single doses of 23.6-33 Gy at the C4-T2 spinal levels. After irradiation, the rats were randomized to the radiation only control group and the Ramipril-treated (radiation + Ramipril) experimental group. Ramipril 1.5 mg/kg/day was given in the drinking water starting 1 week after radiation through the study duration. RESULTS: All the rats irradiated with 28.5-33 Gy became paralyzed at 125 ± 4 days, whereas no rats became paralyzed after 23.6 Gy. The time to develop paralysis was delayed to 135 ± 4 days in Ramipril-treated group (P < 0.001). H&E and LFB showed microscopic structural restoration and remyelination with Ramipril treatment. VEGF expression was increased in the irradiated spinal cord, and the number of VEGF-positive cells was significantly decreased by Ramipril treatment (P < 0.001). Immunohistochemical stain with Iba-1 showed increased microglial infiltration in the irradiated spinal cords. The number of Iba-1-positive microglia was significantly reduced by Ramipril treatment (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Ramipril reduced the rate of paralysis even at the paralysis-inducing radiation doses. It also significantly delayed the onset of paralysis. Neuroinflammation and endothelial cell damage may be the key mediators of radiation injury. Ramipril can be readily translatable to clinical application as a mitigatory of radiotherapeutic toxicity.
STUDY DESIGN: Experimental study. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor Ramipril, as a mitigator of radiation-induced spinal cord injury. SETTING: Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA. METHODS: Total of 22 rats were irradiated with single doses of 23.6-33 Gy at the C4-T2 spinal levels. After irradiation, the rats were randomized to the radiation only control group and the Ramipril-treated (radiation + Ramipril) experimental group. Ramipril 1.5 mg/kg/day was given in the drinking water starting 1 week after radiation through the study duration. RESULTS: All the rats irradiated with 28.5-33 Gy became paralyzed at 125 ± 4 days, whereas no rats became paralyzed after 23.6 Gy. The time to develop paralysis was delayed to 135 ± 4 days in Ramipril-treated group (P < 0.001). H&E and LFB showed microscopic structural restoration and remyelination with Ramipril treatment. VEGF expression was increased in the irradiated spinal cord, and the number of VEGF-positive cells was significantly decreased by Ramipril treatment (P < 0.001). Immunohistochemical stain with Iba-1 showed increased microglial infiltration in the irradiated spinal cords. The number of Iba-1-positive microglia was significantly reduced by Ramipril treatment (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION:Ramipril reduced the rate of paralysis even at the paralysis-inducing radiation doses. It also significantly delayed the onset of paralysis. Neuroinflammation and endothelial cell damage may be the key mediators of radiation injury. Ramipril can be readily translatable to clinical application as a mitigatory of radiotherapeutic toxicity.
Authors: Tammy C Lee; Dana Greene-Schloesser; Valerie Payne; Debra I Diz; Fang-Chi Hsu; Mitra Kooshki; Rashida Mustafa; David R Riddle; Weiling Zhao; Michael D Chan; Mike E Robbins Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2012-06-12 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: A Molteni; J E Moulder; E F Cohen; W F Ward; B L Fish; J M Taylor; L F Wolfe; L Brizio-Molteni; P Veno Journal: Int J Radiat Biol Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 2.694
Authors: Julius Benicky; Enrique Sánchez-Lemus; Masaru Honda; Tao Pang; Martina Orecna; Juan Wang; Yan Leng; De-Maw Chuang; Juan M Saavedra Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2010-12-08 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Syed T Rahman; Wright B Lauten; Qamar A Khan; Sushant Navalkar; Sampath Parthasarathy; Bobby V Khan Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2002-03-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Samuel Ryu; Jian-Yue Jin; Ryan Jin; Jack Rock; Munther Ajlouni; Benjamin Movsas; Mark Rosenblum; Jae Ho Kim Journal: Cancer Date: 2007-02-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Munjal M Acharya; Kim N Green; Barrett D Allen; Allison R Najafi; Amber Syage; Harutyun Minasyan; Mi T Le; Takumi Kawashita; Erich Giedzinski; Vipan K Parihar; Brian L West; Janet E Baulch; Charles L Limoli Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-08-12 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Carmen I Rios; David R Cassatt; Brynn A Hollingsworth; Merriline M Satyamitra; Yeabsera S Tadesse; Lanyn P Taliaferro; Thomas A Winters; Andrea L DiCarlo Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2021-01-01 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: Maria Saager; Eric W Hahn; Peter Peschke; Stephan Brons; Peter E Huber; Jürgen Debus; Christian P Karger Journal: J Radiat Res Date: 2020-09-08 Impact factor: 2.724