Literature DB >> 29903820

Complete Genome Sequences of Three Campylobacter jejuni Phage-Propagating Strains.

J C Sacher1, E Yee2, C M Szymanski1,3, W G Miller4.   

Abstract

Bacteriophage therapy can potentially reduce Campylobacter jejuni numbers in livestock, but it requires a detailed understanding of phage-host interactions. C. jejuni strains readily infected by certain phages are designated as phage-propagating strains. Here, we report the complete genome sequences of three such strains, NCTC 12660, NCTC 12661, and NCTC 12664.
Copyright © 2018 Sacher et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29903820      PMCID: PMC6003733          DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00514-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Announc


GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Campylobacter jejuni causes diarrheal disease worldwide, and C. jejuni infections arise from consuming and mishandling contaminated poultry (1–3). Phages are being explored as antibiotic alternatives to reduce this burden (4–6). Phages are highly strain specific, so understanding the factors that contribute to this specificity, including capsular polysaccharides (CPSs), flagella (7), and restriction/modification systems (8, 9), can maximize the strain range targeted (10). C. jejuni strains were historically tracked based on phage susceptibility (11, 12). For these typing schemes, each phage was designated a readily infected “phage-propagating” strain. To identify factors governing phage susceptibility in C. jejuni, we sequenced the genomes of three C. jejuni phage-propagating strains isolated from chickens (12), NCTC 12660, NCTC 12661, and NCTC 12664. Whole-genome sequencing was performed using the PacBio RS and Illumina MiSeq sequencing platforms. PacBio sequence data were assembled to construct a single closed chromosomal contig for each strain. MiSeq reads were used to validate base calls and to determine the variability at each poly-G tract. Protein-, rRNA-, and tRNA-coding genes were identified as described previously (13). The genome sizes ranged from 1.61 to 1.68 Mb with an average GC content of 30.6%. The three genomes show high similarity to strain NCTC 11168, although NCTC 12660 has at least one small inversion compared to NCTC 11168. These four genomes encode a similar number of genes and pseudogenes, with the genome of NCTC 12660 slightly larger due to the presence of a genomic island. Many of the pseudogenes identified were conserved across all or most of the three strains and NCTC 11168. We identified several differences in restriction/modification (R/M) and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated (Cas) systems between these strains. Relative to the others, NCTC 12661 lacks a type I R/M system, NCTC 12661 and NCTC 12664 lack the type IIG restriction endonuclease (RE) cj1051, NCTC 12661 uniquely encodes a type III R/M system and the type IIG RE (locus tag CJ12661_0039), and the type IV R/M system subunit mcrB is a pseudogene in NCTC 12660. Interestingly, all but NCTC 12664 encode a full type II-C CRISPR/Cas system, with cas9 a pseudogene in NCTC 12664. CPS variability influences C. jejuni phage susceptibility (7, 14), but flagellar glycans play an unknown role (15). Strains NCTC 12661 and NCTC 12664 cluster separately from NCTC 12660 and NCTC 11168 in CPS and flagellar glycosylation gene content, which could lead to differences in phage-host interactions. In addition to C. jejuni strain-strain variation, within-strain genome variation has been observed (16, 17). We compared our NCTC 12661 sequence to two prior genomes sequenced for this strain: GenBank accession numbers CP010906 (18) and CP020045 (17). Two alleles for pseD, encoding the flagellar acetamidino-substituted pseudaminic acid transferase, were previously observed (17, 19). Our NCTC 12661 pseD was 100% and 86% identical to these alleles. The pseD sequence from the earliest NCTC 12661 genome (18) has regions of similarity to each of the pseD genes from the subsequently sequenced genomes. This suggests possible recombination, although sequencing or assembly issues could be responsible. Either scenario could be explained by the many pseD homologs encoded by most C. jejuni strains (20). This example highlights the plasticity of C. jejuni genomes.

Accession number(s).

The complete genome sequences of C. jejuni strains NCTC 12660, NCTC 12661, and NCTC 12664 have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers CP028910, CP028911, and CP028912, respectively.
  18 in total

1.  CRISPR-Cas and restriction-modification systems are compatible and increase phage resistance.

Authors:  Marie-Ève Dupuis; Manuela Villion; Alfonso H Magadán; Sylvain Moineau
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  Evidence of genomic instability in Campylobacter jejuni isolated from poultry.

Authors:  T M Wassenaar; B Geilhausen; D G Newell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Following an imaginary Campylobacter population from farm to fork and beyond: a bacterial perspective.

Authors:  T M Wassenaar
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 2.858

4.  Bacteriophage F336 recognizes the capsular phosphoramidate modification of Campylobacter jejuni NCTC11168.

Authors:  Martine C Holst Sørensen; Lieke B van Alphen; Anne Harboe; Jianjun Li; Bjarke Bak Christensen; Christine M Szymanski; Lone Brøndsted
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Phage typing of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli and its use as an adjunct to serotyping.

Authors:  J A Frost; J M Kramer; S A Gillanders
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.451

6.  Development of a bacteriophage typing system for Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli.

Authors:  B A Grajewski; J W Kusek; H M Gelfand
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Barriers to Horizontal Gene Transfer in Campylobacter jejuni.

Authors:  Susan P Gardner; Jonathan W Olson
Journal:  Adv Appl Microbiol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 5.086

8.  Filamentation of Campylobacter in broth cultures.

Authors:  Nacheervan M Ghaffar; Phillippa L Connerton; Ian F Connerton
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Impact of a single phage and a phage cocktail application in broilers on reduction of Campylobacter jejuni and development of resistance.

Authors:  Samuel Fischer; Sophie Kittler; Günter Klein; Gerhard Glünder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparative genomics of the Campylobacter lari group.

Authors:  William G Miller; Emma Yee; Mary H Chapman; Timothy P L Smith; James L Bono; Steven Huynh; Craig T Parker; Peter Vandamme; Khai Luong; Jonas Korlach
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 3.416

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Developments in Rapid Detection Methods for the Detection of Foodborne Campylobacter in the United States.

Authors:  Steven C Ricke; Kristina M Feye; W Evan Chaney; Zhaohao Shi; Hilary Pavlidis; Yichao Yang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 5.640

2.  Binding of Phage-Encoded FlaGrab to Motile Campylobacter jejuni Flagella Inhibits Growth, Downregulates Energy Metabolism, and Requires Specific Flagellar Glycans.

Authors:  Jessica C Sacher; Asif Shajahan; James Butcher; Robert T Patry; Annika Flint; David R Hendrixson; Alain Stintzi; Parastoo Azadi; Christine M Szymanski
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 5.640

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.