Literature DB >> 29902956

The Real-Time IRB: A Collaborative Innovation to Decrease IRB Review Time.

Ryan Spellecy1, Ann Marie Eve1, Emily R Connors1, Reza Shaker1, David C Clark1.   

Abstract

Lengthy review times for institutional review boards (IRBs) are a well-known barrier to research. In response to numerous calls to reduce review times, we devised "Real-Time IRB," a process that drastically reduces IRB review time. In this, investigators and study staff attend the IRB meeting and make changes to the protocol while the IRB continues its meeting, so that final approval can be issued at the meeting. This achieved an overall reduction in time from submission to the IRB to final approval of 40%. While this process is time and resource intensive, and cannot address all delays in research, it shows great promise for increasing the pace by which research is translated to patient care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IRB; IRB performance; assessment; clinical trials; collaboration; evaluation; evaluation research; quality; research ethics committee

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29902956      PMCID: PMC6146014          DOI: 10.1177/1556264618780803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  11 in total

1.  Obstacles facing translational research in academic medical centers.

Authors:  J S Pober; C S Neuhauser; J M Pober
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Variation in Institutional Review processes for a multisite observational study.

Authors:  Catherine C Vick; Kelly R Finan; Catarina Kiefe; Leigh Neumayer; Mary T Hawn
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Medical education research and IRB review: an analysis and comparison of the IRB review process at six institutions.

Authors:  Liselotte N Dyrbye; Matthew R Thomas; Alex J Mechaber; Anne Eacker; William Harper; F Stanford Massie; David V Power; Tait D Shanafelt
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  What scientists want from their research ethics committee.

Authors:  Patricia Keith-Spiegel; Barbara Tabachnick
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Clinical and Translational Science Awards: can they increase the efficiency and speed of clinical and translational research?

Authors:  Caren Heller; Inmaculada de Melo-Martín
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Variation in institutional review board responses to a standard, observational, pediatric research protocol.

Authors:  Jonathan Mansbach; Uchechi Acholonu; Sunday Clark; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 3.451

7.  Ethical Issues and Practical Challenges in Suicide Research.

Authors:  Melanie A Hom; Matthew C Podlogar; Ian H Stanley; Thomas E Joiner
Journal:  Crisis       Date:  2016-08-26

8.  Time required to review research protocols at 10 Veterans Affairs Institutional Review Boards.

Authors:  Patrick R Varley; Ulrike Feske; Shasha Gao; Roslyn A Stone; Sijian Zhang; Robert Monte; Robert M Arnold; Daniel E Hall
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.192

9.  Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise.

Authors:  Nancy S Sung; William F Crowley; Myron Genel; Patricia Salber; Lewis Sandy; Louis M Sherwood; Stephen B Johnson; Veronica Catanese; Hugh Tilson; Kenneth Getz; Elaine L Larson; David Scheinberg; E Albert Reece; Harold Slavkin; Adrian Dobs; Jack Grebb; Rick A Martinez; Allan Korn; David Rimoin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Principal investigator views of the IRB system.

Authors:  Simon N Whitney; Kirsten Alcser; Carl Schneider; Laurence B McCullough; Amy L McGuire; Robert J Volk
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 3.738

View more
  4 in total

1.  Operational Characteristics of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) in the United States.

Authors:  Genevieve L Nesom; Iraklis Petrof; Tyler M Moore
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2019-10-16

2.  Accelerating implementation of research in Learning Health Systems: Lessons learned from VA Health Services Research and NCATS Clinical Science Translation Award programs.

Authors:  Amy M Kilbourne; Patricia L Jones; David Atkins
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2020-03-17

3.  Reimagining IRB review to incorporate a clear and convincing standard of evidence.

Authors:  E Smith; E E Anderson
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  COVID-19 pandemic response varies by clinical trial sponsor type.

Authors:  Lisa Cooper; Irene Lee; Doreen Waldron Lechner
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2021-03-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.