| Literature DB >> 29902927 |
Tiantian Ye1, Yue Wu2, Lei Shang3, Xueqing Deng2, Shujun Wang1.
Abstract
Borneol as a penetration enhancer is widely used in guiding other components through the biological barrier into the targeting organs or tissues. This study aimed at studying effect and mechanism of synthetic borneol (S-BO) on improving lymphatic-targeting ability of 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin liposomes (SN-38-Lips) via increasing lymph node uptake. At first, SN-38-Lips prepared had appropriate particle distribution, drug loading property and compatible stability with S-BO. Both in vitro cellular uptake and in vivo fluorescence imaging showed that 2 and 5 mg/mL S-BO, especially 2 mg/mL S-BO, enhanced cytoplasmic fluorescence signal of SN-38-Lips in the macrophages based on phagocytosis effect. And high-intensity zone appeared in the paracortex and medulla of popliteal lymph node. SN-38-Lips were subcutaneously (s.c.) injected into the right footpad of KM rats in the dose of 4 mg/kg following s.c. injection of 1, 2 and 5 mg/mL BO suspension. The lymphatic pharmacokinetics were investigated to explore the promotion law of S-BO, and combined with tissue irritation to optimize S-BO concentrations. The results indicated that 2 mg/mL S-BO could reduce injection-site retention, and prolong residence time and increase uptake of lymph nodes, which would not cause inflammatory reaction of injection site. In conclusion, the present study may provide a basic study for improving lymphatic-targeting ability of SN-38-Lips by the S-BO regulation, and to be the helpful guidance for further study in lymphatic targeting of delivery system.Entities:
Keywords: 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin; Synthetic borneol; lymph node uptake; lymphatic targeting; nanoliposome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29902927 PMCID: PMC6058601 DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2018.1482973
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drug Deliv ISSN: 1071-7544 Impact factor: 6.419
Figure 1.(A) Particle size distribution and morphology of SN-38-Lips and the effect of S-BO with the concentration of 1, 2 and 5 mg/mL on (B) entrapment efficiency %, (C) size distribution and (D) zeta potential of SN-38-Lips (mean ± SD, n = 3).
Figure 2.(A) In vitro cellular uptake of RAW264.7 cell line treated with SN-38 solution, SN-38-Lips and SN-38-Lips combined with S-BO in the concentrations of 1, 2 and 5 mg/mL. (B) Fluorescent image at ×400K magnification in the medulla of PLNs at 1 h post-administration via s.c. injection of SN-38-Lips combined with 2 mg/mL S-BO.
Figure 3.In vivo fluorescence imaging of PLNs subcutaneously injected with SN-38-Lips and SN-38-Lips combined with S-BO in the concentrations of 1, 2 and 5 mg/mL at 30 min, 1 h and 6 h. (B) Fluorescent image at ×200K magnification in the medulla of PLNs at 1 h post-administration via s.c. injection of SN-38-Lips combined with 2 mg/mL S-BO. (C) Fluorescent image at ×400K magnification in the medulla of PLNs at 6 h post-administration via s.c. injection of SN-38-Lips and SN-38-Lips combined with 1, 2 and 5 mg/mL S-BO.
Non-compartmental pharmacokinetic parameters of injection site, plasma, popliteal lymph nodes (PLNs), iliac lymph nodes (ILNs) and renal lymph nodes (RLNs) in the SN-38-Lips group and SN-38-Lips group combined with S-BO in the concentrations of 1, 2 and 5 mg/mL following s.c. administration at the dosing of 4 mg/kg (mean ± SD, n = 6).
| SN-38-Lips | SN-38-Lips+ | SN-38-Lips+ | SN-38-Lips+ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-S-BO | 2-S-BO | 5-S-BO | |||
| Injection site | |||||
| AUC0–24 h | mg/kg·h | 8235.673 | 6290.983 | 5496.435 | 5657.746 |
| AUC0–∞ | mg/kg·h | 16,269.832 | 13,223.539 | 7295.406 | 10,560.689 |
| MRT0–24 h | h | 10.659 | 13.073 | 9.962 | 10.547 |
| MRT0–∞ | h | 34.043 | 31.302 | 18.592 | 33.085 |
| h | 23.571 | 16.524 | 14.524 | 24.32 | |
| CLz/F | L/h/kg | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tmax | h | 1 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Cmax | mg/kg | 473.299 | 312.632 | 328.568 | 407.063 |
| Plasma | |||||
| AUC0–24 h | μg/kg·h | 201.643 | 97.848 | 290.345 | 163.285 |
| AUC0–∞ | μg/kg·h | 228.936 | 159.59 | 406.256 | 163.31 |
| MRT0–24 h | h | 1.866 | 3.462 | 11.387 | 0.375 |
| MRT0–∞ | h | 2.685 | 3.958 | 12.104 | 0.375 |
| h | 1.898 | 0.516 | 2.436 | 0.172 | |
| CLz/F | L/h/kg | 17.472 | 25.064 | 9.846 | 24.493 |
| Tmax | h | 0.083 | 4 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Cmax | μg/kg | 85.093 | 77.891 | 217.385 | 251.644 |
| PLNs | |||||
| AUC0–24 h | mg/kg·h | 19.619 | 8.75 | 66.703 | 29.632 |
| AUC0–∞ | mg/kg·h | 20.412 | 14.127 | 96.423 | 30.273 |
| MRT0–24 h | h | 2.964 | 4.562 | 5.803 | 4.887 |
| MRT0–∞ | h | 3.448 | 5.513 | 9.504 | 5.423 |
| h | 2.323 | 0.355 | 4.027 | 4.298 | |
| CLz/F | L/h/kg | 0.196 | 0.210 | 0.041 | 0.132 |
| Tmax | h | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Cmax | mg/kg | 6.369 | 2.326 | 17.413 | 8.661 |
| ILNs | |||||
| AUC0–24 h | mg/kg*h | 12.818 | 6.662 | 117.857 | 23.099 |
| AUC0–∞ | mg/kg*h | 13.498 | 8.633 | 119.797 | 39.276 |
| MRT0–24 h | h | 2.982 | 4.833 | 8.023 | 8.428 |
| MRT0–∞ | h | 3.630 | 5.256 | 8.361 | 24.511 |
| h | 2.345 | 5.422 | 3.365 | 14.5 | |
| CLz/F | L/h/kg | 0.296 | 0.463 | 0.033 | 0.102 |
| Tmax | h | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 |
| Cmax | mg/kg | 5.612 | 1.067 | 17.726 | 7.308 |
| RLNs | |||||
| AUC0–24 h | mg/kg*h | 15.773 | 19.577 | 163.102 | 12.049 |
| AUC0–∞ | mg/kg*h | 35.653 | 28.307 | 166.637 | 13.963 |
| MRT0–24 h | h | 15.006 | 10.373 | 9.125 | 5.233 |
| MRT0–∞ | h | 21.116 | 20.955 | 9.551 | 7.002 |
| h | 15.176 | 14.334 | 3.602 | 4.253 | |
| CLz/F | L/h/kg | 0.112 | 0.141 | 0.024 | 0.286 |
| Tmax | h | 4 | 6 | 6 | 0.167 |
| Cmax | mg/kg | 2.722 | 1.134 | 18.485 | 4.631 |
The following parameters were included AUC: area under the plasma–time curve; MRT: the mean residence time; t1/2: the half-life; V: the distribution volumes of the compartment; CL: clearance; Cmax: maximum plasma concentration; Tmax: time to reach the maximum plasma concentration.
Figure 5.Pathological microphotography of (A) right rear foot pad at ×200K magnification and (B) lymph node at ×200K and ×400K magnification following s.c. administration with S-BO in the concentrations of 1, 2 and 5 mg/mL.