Larissa J Maier1, Jason A Ferris2, Adam R Winstock3. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, USA. Electronic address: larissa.maier@ucsf.edu. 2. Institute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Australia. Electronic address: j.ferris@uq.edu.au. 3. Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London; Global Drug Survey Ltd, London, UK. Electronic address: adam@globaldrugsurvey.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Psychoactive substance use aiming at increased performance at work or while studying, usually referred to as pharmacological cognitive enhancement (PCE), has been extensively researched in recent years. While large scale national studies have tried to assess the prevalence of PCE among the general population, cross-cultural comparisons have been hampered by the different definitions and designs included. In addition, the non-medical use of prescription drugs indicated to treat the symptoms of the Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) has been the focus of discussion, yet no study has addressed the association between ADHD rates, prescribing behaviour and PCE yet. METHODS: The Global Drug Survey is an annually conducted anonymous web survey on substance use. Two data sets from male and female Global Drug Survey (GDS) participants aged 16 to 65 years with no previous ADHD diagnosis were analysed to assess12-month PCE in 15 countries. GDS2015 (n = 79,640) examined the patterns of and motives for stimulant PCE, while GDS2017 (n = 29,758) focused on both the use of stimulant and sedative drugs for PCE RESULTS: When comparing the study samples 2015 and 2017, PCE with prescription and illegal stimulants and modafinil increased across all countries. People who used stimulant drugs and modafinil for PCE rated the perceived effect on cognitive performance most beneficial, while alcohol was the substance with the most adverse effect. CONCLUSION: The analysis of data on stimulant use for PCE in the largest global sample highlights relatively low-risk PCE use patterns except for participants with illegal stimulant use for PCE. The globalisation of ADHD, physicians' prescribing behaviour and changes in drug policy are likely to influence the country-specific rate of PCE among non-ADHD individuals what calls for further investigation.
BACKGROUND: Psychoactive substance use aiming at increased performance at work or while studying, usually referred to as pharmacological cognitive enhancement (PCE), has been extensively researched in recent years. While large scale national studies have tried to assess the prevalence of PCE among the general population, cross-cultural comparisons have been hampered by the different definitions and designs included. In addition, the non-medical use of prescription drugs indicated to treat the symptoms of the Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) has been the focus of discussion, yet no study has addressed the association between ADHD rates, prescribing behaviour and PCE yet. METHODS: The Global Drug Survey is an annually conducted anonymous web survey on substance use. Two data sets from male and female Global Drug Survey (GDS) participants aged 16 to 65 years with no previous ADHD diagnosis were analysed to assess12-month PCE in 15 countries. GDS2015 (n = 79,640) examined the patterns of and motives for stimulant PCE, while GDS2017 (n = 29,758) focused on both the use of stimulant and sedative drugs for PCE RESULTS: When comparing the study samples 2015 and 2017, PCE with prescription and illegal stimulants and modafinil increased across all countries. People who used stimulant drugs and modafinil for PCE rated the perceived effect on cognitive performance most beneficial, while alcohol was the substance with the most adverse effect. CONCLUSION: The analysis of data on stimulant use for PCE in the largest global sample highlights relatively low-risk PCE use patterns except for participants with illegal stimulant use for PCE. The globalisation of ADHD, physicians' prescribing behaviour and changes in drug policy are likely to influence the country-specific rate of PCE among non-ADHD individuals what calls for further investigation.
Authors: Ann-Kathrin Kexel; Matthias Vonmoos; Katrin H Preller; Lea M Hulka; Erich Seifritz; Boris B Quednow Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2020-06-30 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: George Savulich; Emily Thorp; Thomas Piercy; Katie A Peterson; John D Pickard; Barbara J Sahakian Journal: Front Behav Neurosci Date: 2019-01-21 Impact factor: 3.558
Authors: Johanna Daubner; Muhammad Imran Arshaad; Christina Henseler; Jürgen Hescheler; Dan Ehninger; Karl Broich; Oliver Rawashdeh; Anna Papazoglou; Marco Weiergräber Journal: Neural Plast Date: 2021-01-13 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Winston Chung; Sheng-Fang Jiang; Diana Paksarian; Aki Nikolaidis; F Xavier Castellanos; Kathleen R Merikangas; Michael P Milham Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2019-11-01
Authors: Sanyogita Sanya Ram; Bruce Russell; Carl Kirkpatrick; Kay Stewart; Shane Scahill; Marcus Henning; Louise Curley; Safeera Hussainy Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-11-20 Impact factor: 3.240