Literature DB >> 29902165

Notes from the Field: Carbapenemase-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae from Less Common Enterobacteriaceae Genera - United States, 2014-2017.

Maroya S Walters, Medora Witwer, Yeon-Kyeng Lee, Valerie Albrecht, David Lonsway, J Kamile Rasheed, Melissa Anacker, Paula Snippes-Vagnone, Ruth Lynfield, Alexander J Kallen.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29902165      PMCID: PMC6002034          DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6723a4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep        ISSN: 0149-2195            Impact factor:   17.586


× No keyword cloud information.
Infections with carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CP-CRE) are associated with high mortality rates (). Carbapenemases encoded on plasmids can move between bacterial strains and have the potential to rapidly increase the proportion of Enterobacteriaceae resistant to carbapenems; as such, CP-CRE have been a particular focus of public health response. Although the Enterobacteriaceae family includes approximately 50 recognized genera, surveillance for CP-CRE has focused on the organisms most associated with clinical infections: Klebsiella spp., Enterobacter spp., and Escherichia coli (,). CRE from other, less commonly encountered genera (hereafter referred to as less common genera) have generally not been targeted for carbapenemase testing, in part, because some of these organisms possess intrinsic resistance to the carbapenem imipenem and others express species-specific chromosomal carbapenemases. However, these organisms can also harbor plasmid-mediated carbapenemases. This report describes CP-CRE from less common genera identified through reference testing at CDC and surveillance at the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Public Health Laboratory. CDC’s Clinical and Environmental Microbiology Branch performs molecular testing on submitted CRE to detect Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM), Verona integron-mediated metallo-β-lactamase (VIM), active-on-imipenem (IMP), and OXA-48-type carbapenemases. During January 1, 2014–May 25, 2017, CDC identified 1,039 CP-CRE, including 63 (6.1%) from the less common genera. Isolates from the less common genera were submitted by 23 states; Iowa (10; 16%) and Pennsylvania (seven; 11%) contributed the most. KPC-producing Citrobacter spp. (27; 42.9%) was the most common organism-mechanism combination identified (Table).
TABLE

Carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae by species and mechanism, among organisms other than Klebsiella spp., Enterobacter spp., and E. coli tested at CDC, January 1, 2014–May 25, 2017, and the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Public Health Laboratory, January 1, 2014–September 10, 2017*

Laboratory (period)/OrganismMechanism
Total
KPCIMPNDMOXA-48 typeVIM
CDC (January 1, 2014–May 25, 2017)
Citrobacter §
27
0
1
0
1
29
Citrobacter freundii
22
0
1
0
1
24
Citrobacter koseri
2
0
0
0
0
2
Citrobacter braakii
1
0
0
0
0
1
Citrobacter farmeri
1
0
0
0
0
1
Morganella §
0
1
2
0
0
3
Morganella morganii
0
1
1
0
0
2
Proteus mirabilis
6
2
2
0
1
11
Providencia §
1
8
1
0
0
10
Providencia rettgeri
0
6
0
0
0
6
Providencia stuartii
1
1
1
0
0
3
Raoultella §
4
0
0
0
1
5
Raoultella ornithinolytica
1
0
0
0
0
1
Serratia
4
0
0
0
1
5
Serratia marcescens
3
0
0
0
1
4
Serratia ureilytica
1
0
0
0
0
1
Total, CDC
42
11
6
0
4
63
MDH Public Health Laboratory (January 1, 2014–September 10, 2017)
Citrobacter freundii
6
0
1
0
0
7
Providencia rettgeri
0
7
1
0
0
8
Serratia marcescens
1
0
0
0
1
2
Raoultella planticola
1
0
0
0
0
1
Raoultella ornithinolytica
0
0
0
1
0
1
Leclercia adecarboxylata
1
0
0
0
0
1
Total, MDH Public Health Laboratory 9 7 2 1 1 20

Abbreviations: CP-CRE = carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae; IMP = active-on-imipenem; KPC = Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase; NDM = New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase; VIM = Verona integron-mediated metallo-β-lactamase.

* Two IMP-producing Providencia rettgeri and one VIM-producing Serratia marcescens from Minnesota are included in both the CDC and MDH Public Health Laboratory sections of the table.

† Limited to isolates submitted to CDC for confirmatory testing; not all passively reported CP-CRE patients had isolates submitted.

One KPC-producing Citrobacter, one NDM-producing Morganella, one IMP-producing Providencia, three KPC-producing Raoultella, and one VIM-producing Raoultella were not identified to species level.

Abbreviations: CP-CRE = carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae; IMP = active-on-imipenem; KPC = Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase; NDM = New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase; VIM = Verona integron-mediated metallo-β-lactamase. * Two IMP-producing Providencia rettgeri and one VIM-producing Serratia marcescens from Minnesota are included in both the CDC and MDH Public Health Laboratory sections of the table. † Limited to isolates submitted to CDC for confirmatory testing; not all passively reported CP-CRE patients had isolates submitted. One KPC-producing Citrobacter, one NDM-producing Morganella, one IMP-producing Providencia, three KPC-producing Raoultella, and one VIM-producing Raoultella were not identified to species level. CRE producing a carbapenemase other than KPC are historically uncommon in the United States and often associated with health care exposures outside the United States. Epidemiologic data were available for 20 of 28 patients with non–KPC–CP-CRE from less common genera passively reported to CDC during this period. The median patient age was 62.5 years (range = 2 months to 79 years). Travel history in the year preceding the positive culture was reported for 18 patients; 10 did not travel outside the United States, including five from a single cluster. Six patients were hospitalized outside the United States: three in India, and one each in the Philippines, Romania, and Spain. The Minnesota Department of Health initiated surveillance for all CRE species in Hennepin and Ramsey counties in 2012 and expanded surveillance statewide on January 1, 2016. Isolates submitted to the MDH Public Health Laboratory are tested for carbapenemases. During January 1, 2014–September 30, 2017, 149 (12%) of 1,241 CRE submitted were carbapenemase-producing; the percentage did not differ between isolates from the more common (Klebsiella spp., Enterobacter spp., and E. coli) and the less common genera. Among the 149 CP-CRE isolates, all were from unique patients, and 20 (13.4%) were from less common genera. The most common organism and mechanism combinations among the less common genera were IMP-producing Providencia rettgeri (seven; 35%) and KPC-producing Citrobacter freundii (six; 30%) (Table). Epidemiologic data were available for the 20 Minnesota patients with CP-CRE from the less common genera; no clusters were identified. The median patient age was 56.5 years (range = 14–75 years), and 15 (75%) patients were hospitalized at the time of culture collection. Two patients were hospitalized internationally (one each in Kenya and Kuwait) in the year before their positive culture. Less common Enterobacteriaceae genera appear to be a small but potentially important subset of CP-CRE; however, estimates of the true proportion of CP-CRE from these less common genera are limited by the lack of systematic testing. Of note, many of the carbapenemases in the less common CRE genera were not KPC. These were frequently identified in patients who did not report travel outside the United States in the year preceding their positive culture, indicating domestic acquisition. Clinicians should be aware that CRE from the less common genera can harbor carbapenemases and consider requesting carbapenemase testing from state public health laboratories to guide infection control practices and prevent further spread of these resistance mechanisms. CRE surveillance that includes a broader range of Enterobacteriaceae genera is being piloted in 10 states and will be critical for better understanding the potential impact of these less common genera on the spread of carbapenemases.
  3 in total

1.  Epidemiology of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae in 7 US Communities, 2012-2013.

Authors:  Alice Y Guh; Sandra N Bulens; Yi Mu; Jesse T Jacob; Jessica Reno; Janine Scott; Lucy E Wilson; Elisabeth Vaeth; Ruth Lynfield; Kristin M Shaw; Paula M Snippes Vagnone; Wendy M Bamberg; Sarah J Janelle; Ghinwa Dumyati; Cathleen Concannon; Zintars Beldavs; Margaret Cunningham; P Maureen Cassidy; Erin C Phipps; Nicole Kenslow; Tatiana Travis; David Lonsway; J Kamile Rasheed; Brandi M Limbago; Alexander J Kallen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Comparing the Outcomes of Patients With Carbapenemase-Producing and Non-Carbapenemase-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia.

Authors:  Pranita D Tamma; Katherine E Goodman; Anthony D Harris; Tsigereda Tekle; Ava Roberts; Abimbola Taiwo; Patricia J Simner
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Antimicrobial-Resistant Pathogens Associated With Healthcare-Associated Infections: Summary of Data Reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011-2014.

Authors:  Lindsey M Weiner; Amy K Webb; Brandi Limbago; Margaret A Dudeck; Jean Patel; Alexander J Kallen; Jonathan R Edwards; Dawn M Sievert
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.254

  3 in total
  7 in total

1.  Detection and Characterization of Targeted Carbapenem-Resistant Health Care-Associated Threats: Findings from the Antibiotic Resistance Laboratory Network, 2017 to 2019.

Authors:  Sarah Sabour; Jennifer Y Huang; Amelia Bhatnagar; Sarah E Gilbert; Maria Karlsson; David Lonsway; Joseph D Lutgring; J Kamile Rasheed; Alison Laufer Halpin; Richard A Stanton; Stephanie Gumbis; Christopher A Elkins; Allison C Brown
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Risk Assessment After a Severe Hospital-Acquired Infection Associated With Carbapenemase-Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Joost Hopman; Corianne Meijer; Nikki Kenters; Jordy P M Coolen; Mohammad R Ghamati; Shaheen Mehtar; Reinout van Crevel; Wim J Morshuis; Ad F T M Verhagen; Michel M van den Heuvel; Andreas Voss; Heiman F L Wertheim
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-02-01

3.  Molecular Characterization of Carbapenem-Resistant Serratia marcescens Clinical Isolates in a Tertiary Hospital in Hangzhou, China.

Authors:  Qian Xu; Ying Fu; Feng Zhao; Yan Jiang; Yunsong Yu
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 4.  Continuous Evolution: Perspective on the Epidemiology of Carbapenemase Resistance Among Enterobacterales and Other Gram-Negative Bacteria.

Authors:  Glen T Hansen
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2021-01-25

5.  Carbapenemase production among less-common Enterobacterales genera: 10 US sites, 2018.

Authors:  Alicia Shugart; Garrett Mahon; Jennifer Y Huang; Maria Karlsson; Ann Valley; Megan Lasure; Annastasia Gross; Brittany Pattee; Elisabeth Vaeth; Richard Brooks; Tyler Maruca; Catherine E Dominguez; David Torpey; Drew Francis; Rachana Bhattarai; Marion A Kainer; Allison Chan; Heather Dubendris; Shermalyn R Greene; Sara J Blosser; D J Shannon; Kelly Jones; Brenda Brennan; Sopheay Hun; Marisa D'Angeli; Caitlin N Murphy; Maureen Tierney; Natashia Reese; Amelia Bhatnagar; Alex Kallen; Allison C Brown; Maroya Spalding Walters
Journal:  JAC Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2021-09-04

6.  Analysis of the molecular characteristics of a blaKPC-2-harbouring untypeable plasmid in Serratia marcescens.

Authors:  Xiaokun Wang; Weiqiang Xiao; Lu Li; Min Jing; Mingyue Sun; Yanmin Chang; Yuanye Qu; Yu Jiang; Qingxia Xu
Journal:  Int Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.479

7.  Needs assessment for novel Gram-negative antibiotics in US hospitals: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Strich; Sarah Warner; Yi Ling Lai; Cumhur Y Demirkale; John H Powers; Robert L Danner; Sameer S Kadri
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 71.421

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.