Literature DB >> 2990206

Diagnostic strategies in osteomyelitis.

J Wheat.   

Abstract

Technetium-99 (99Tc) pyrophosphate bone scanning often identifies patients with osteomyelitis before roentgenographic findings appear. However, recent studies have shown that 99Tc bone scanning often gives false-negative results, especially in neonates. The accuracy of computed tomographic scanning and indium-111 leukocyte scanning for diagnosis of early osteomyelitis has not been established. 99Tc bone scanning often gives false-positive results in patients with other conditions leading to bone injury and repair, such as trauma or recent surgery, further limiting the usefulness of this imaging procedure. Newer imaging techniques have not been adequately evaluated to establish their specificity. Because of their high cost and unproved accuracy, these new imaging procedures should not be routinely applied until their usefulness has been established. Bone biopsy remains the procedure of choice for establishing the diagnosis in patients suspected clinically to have osteomyelitis with negative findings on roentgenography and 99Tc bone scanning. Although Staphylococcus aureus is the leading cause of osteomyelitis, other pathogens cause 30 to 40 percent of cases. Aspiration or biopsy of the involved bone is usually required to choose appropriate antibiotic therapy. Bone biopsy is essential in chronic osteomyelitis, since cultures of sinus drainage are unreliable. Osteomyelitis in diabetics with foot infection and in association with decubitus ulcers presents special problems. Radionuclide scanning often give false-positive results in these patients. Proper diagnosis usually requires careful assessment of clinical and roentgenographic findings. Although bone biopsy seems useful in diagnosing osteomyelitis underlying decubitus ulcers, its role in diabetic patients with foot infections is not established. I do not recommend biopsy of foot bones in diabetic patients, since culture of bone biopsy specimens often give unreliable results in these situations because of contamination with ulcer organisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2990206     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(85)90388-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  11 in total

1.  Antibody response to teichoic acid and peptidoglycan in Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis.

Authors:  E Jacob; L C Durham; M C Falk; T J Williams; L J Wheat
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  The diabetic foot: magnetic resonance imaging evaluation.

Authors:  J Beltran; D S Campanini; C Knight; M McCalla
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  A Diagnostic Serum Antibody Test for Patients With Staphylococcus aureus Osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Kohei Nishitani; Christopher A Beck; Alexander F Rosenberg; Stephen L Kates; Edward M Schwarz; John L Daiss
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Treatment of chronic traumatic bone wounds. Microvascular free tissue transfer: a 13-year experience in 96 patients.

Authors:  J W May; J B Jupiter; G G Gallico; D M Rothkopf; P Zingarelli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Comparison of sequences for depicting bone marrow alterations in osteomyelitis applied in a low field strength magnetic resonance imaging system.

Authors:  H Bonél; T Helmberger; H C Geiss; M Steinborn; M M Ritter; M Reiser
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Diagnostic performance of FDG-PET, MRI, and plain film radiography (PFR) for the diagnosis of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot.

Authors:  Asad Nawaz; Drew A Torigian; Evan S Siegelman; Sandip Basu; Timothy Chryssikos; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Diabetic foot infections with osteomyelitis: efficacy of combined surgical and medical treatment.

Authors:  Abubakr H Widatalla; Seif Eldin I Mahadi; Mohamed A Shawer; Shadad M Mahmoud; A E Abdelmageed; Mohamed Elmakki Ahmed
Journal:  Diabet Foot Ankle       Date:  2012-10-01

8.  18-F flourodeoxy glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging: A viable alternative to three phase bone scan in evaluating diabetic foot complications?

Authors:  G S Shagos; Palaniswamy Shanmugasundaram; Ajith Kumar Varma; Subramanyam Padma; Manjit Sarma
Journal:  Indian J Nucl Med       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

9.  Orthopaedic device-related infection: current and future interventions for improved prevention and treatment.

Authors:  T Fintan Moriarty; Richard Kuehl; Tom Coenye; Willem-Jan Metsemakers; Mario Morgenstern; Edward M Schwarz; Martijn Riool; Sebastian A J Zaat; Nina Khana; Stephen L Kates; R Geoff Richards
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-03-13

10.  Serum procollagen type 1 N propeptide: A novel diagnostic test for diabetic foot osteomyelitis - A case-control study.

Authors:  Oliver G Hayes; Venkat N Vangaveti; Usman H Malabu
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 1.852

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.