Literature DB >> 29901750

Murepavadin activity tested against contemporary (2016-17) clinical isolates of XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Helio S Sader1, Robert K Flamm1, Glenn E Dale2, Paul R Rhomberg1, Mariana Castanheira1.   

Abstract

Background: Murepavadin (POL7080) represents the first member of a novel class of outer membrane protein-targeting antibiotics. Murepavadin acts by binding to LPS transport protein D and is being developed for the treatment of hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Objectives: To evaluate the antimicrobial activity of murepavadin against XDR P. aeruginosa.
Methods: A total of 785 clinical isolates of XDR P. aeruginosa were collected in 2016-17 through the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program from 34 medical centres in 21 European nations (n = 353) and 75 medical centres in North America (n = 432). Isolates were categorized as XDR when susceptible (CLSI) to ≤2 of the following antimicrobial classes: antipseudomonal cephalosporins, carbapenems, broad-spectrum penicillin/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides and polymyxins. Susceptibility testing was performed by the reference broth microdilution method and EUCAST and CLSI interpretative criteria were applied.
Results: Murepavadin (MIC50/90, 0.12/0.25 mg/L) inhibited 96.7% of isolates at ≤0.5 mg/L and was 8-fold more active than colistin (MIC50/90, 1/2 mg/L). Only seven isolates (0.9%) exhibited murepavadin MIC values >4 mg/L. Colistin (MIC50/90, 1/2 mg/L; 93.6% susceptible) was the most active comparator, followed by ceftolozane/tazobactam (MIC50/90, 2/>32 mg/L; 70.6% susceptible) and tobramycin (MIC50/90, 8/>8 mg/L; 47.5% susceptible). Murepavadin remained active against isolates that were non-susceptible to colistin (n = 50; MIC50/90, 0.25/0.25 mg/L), ceftolozane/tazobactam (n = 231; MIC50/90, 0.12/0.25 mg/L) and/or tobramycin (n = 412; MIC50/90, 0.12/0.25 mg/L). Conclusions: Murepavadin exhibited potent activity against a large collection of clinical XDR P. aeruginosa isolates from Europe and North America, including isolates that were non-susceptible to colistin, ceftolozane/tazobactam and/or tobramycin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29901750     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dky227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  9 in total

1.  Susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Recovered from Cystic Fibrosis Patients to Murepavadin and 13 Comparator Antibiotics.

Authors:  Miquel B Ekkelenkamp; Rafael Cantón; María Díez-Aguilar; Michael M Tunney; Deirdre F Gilpin; Francesca Bernardini; Glenn E Dale; J Stuart Elborn; Jumamurat R Bayjanov; Ad Fluit
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Colistin for the treatment of urinary tract infections caused by extremely drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Dose is critical.

Authors:  Luisa Sorlí; Sonia Luque; Jian Li; Núria Campillo; Marc Danés; Milagro Montero; Concha Segura; Santiago Grau; Juan Pablo Horcajada
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2019-06-29       Impact factor: 6.072

3.  How to Manage Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections.

Authors:  Matthaios Papadimitriou-Olivgeris; Damien Jacot; Benoit Guery
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 4.  Efficacy and In Vitro Activity of Novel Antibiotics for Infections With Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens.

Authors:  Flora Cruz-López; Adrian Martínez-Meléndez; Rayo Morfin-Otero; Eduardo Rodriguez-Noriega; Héctor J Maldonado-Garza; Elvira Garza-González
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 6.073

Review 5.  Emerging therapies against infections with Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Burkhard Tümmler
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-08-07

Review 6.  Current trends in the treatment of pneumonia due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  Richard R Watkins; David Van Duin
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-01-30

Review 7.  Progress in Alternative Strategies to Combat Antimicrobial Resistance: Focus on Antibiotics.

Authors:  Jayaseelan Murugaiyan; P Anand Kumar; G Srinivasa Rao; Katia Iskandar; Stephen Hawser; John P Hays; Yara Mohsen; Saranya Adukkadukkam; Wireko Andrew Awuah; Ruiz Alvarez Maria Jose; Nanono Sylvia; Esther Patience Nansubuga; Bruno Tilocca; Paola Roncada; Natalia Roson-Calero; Javier Moreno-Morales; Rohul Amin; Ballamoole Krishna Kumar; Abishek Kumar; Abdul-Rahman Toufik; Thaint Nadi Zaw; Oluwatosin O Akinwotu; Maneesh Paul Satyaseela; Maarten B M van Dongen
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-04

Review 8.  Leaks in the Pipeline: a Failure Analysis of Gram-Negative Antibiotic Development from 2010 to 2020.

Authors:  Neha K Prasad; Ian B Seiple; Ryan T Cirz; Oren S Rosenberg
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 5.938

Review 9.  Mammals' humoral immune proteins and peptides targeting the bacterial envelope: from natural protection to therapeutic applications against multidrug-resistant Gram-negatives.

Authors:  María Escobar-Salom; Gabriel Torrens; Elena Jordana-Lluch; Antonio Oliver; Carlos Juan
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2022-01-18
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.