Literature DB >> 29901613

A rare case of primary small bowel de-differentiated liposarcoma causing intussusception: A case report.

Kentaro Matsuo1, Masaya Inoue, Yasutsugu Shirai, Tatsuki Kataoka, Shuji Kagota, Kohei Taniguchi, Sang-Woong Lee, Kazuhisa Uchiyama.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Liposarcoma (LPS) is a relatively rare malignant soft tissue tumor. Management of LPS including diagnosis is difficult, because it has no characteristic symptoms and no established effective treatment. Herein we reported an extremely rare case of intussusception induced by primary small bowel LPS. PATIENT'S CONCERN: A-84-year-old male was a consult to our Emergency Department with symptoms of a terrible general fatigue, abdominal pain, and vomiting. DIAGNOSIS: Abdominal ultrasonography and computed tomography (CT) revealed probable intussusception.
INTERVENTIONS: After decompression by insertion of an ileus tube, surgery was performed. OUTCOMES: The ileum and mesentery of the small intestine had invaginated into the colon. There was no evidence of metastases in the intraabdominal space. The Hutchinson maneuver could not release the invagination, and so ileocecal resection with lymph node dissection was performed. Histopathological examination showed evidence of the growth of spindle-shaped cells. Also, immunohistochemical examination indicated the tumor to be a de-differentiated LPS. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 19 without any complications; and no recurrence of the tumor was observed at 16 months post operation. LESSONS: LPS should be considered in the differential diagnosis of adult intussusception, and careful management should be required, including observation, after surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29901613      PMCID: PMC6023844          DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.889


Introduction

Liposarcoma (LPS) is a malignant soft tissue tumor, usually found in the retroperitoneum, extremities, or cervical area.[ Diagnosis of LPS is relatively difficult, because it has no characteristic symptoms.[ Hence, it is often found by the appearance of delayed symptoms, that is, pain or a palpable lump. In adults, small bowel intussusception is caused by malignant tumors (approximately 30%).[ Indeed, some reports indicated that metastases of LPS-induced intussusception.[ However, intussusception due to primary small bowel LPS is a very rare entity. Herein, we present an extremely rare case of intussusception caused by a primary small bowel LPS that was removed by surgical treatment.

Case report

A-84-year-old male was a consult to our Emergency Department with symptoms of terrible general fatigue, abdominal pain, and vomiting. On physical examination, abdominal pain was detected around his epigastric region, but no lump could be palpated. Routine laboratory investigation yielded increased serum-creatinine (Cre) and total bilirubin (T-bil) levels (Cre, 1.47 mg/dL; T-bil, 2.20 mg/dL). Also, tumor markers were slightly increased (CEA, 4.1 ng/mL; CA-19-9, 46.2 U/mL). Abdominal ultrasonography showed a hypoechoic mass in the colon and hyperechoic area in the ileum (Fig. 1A and B). Computed tomography revealed an intestinal obstruction caused by invagination of the ileum into the colon with the tumor (Fig. 1C).
Figure 1

Highlights of preoperative images. (A) Abdominal ultrasonography image showing a 36.4 mm × 12.7 mm hypoechoic mass in the colon (white arrow). (B) That of the intussusceptional compartment (white arrow). (C) Abdominal CT image showing a continuous low-density tumorous lesion in the lumen of the colon. The white arrow indicates the tumor with ileum.

Highlights of preoperative images. (A) Abdominal ultrasonography image showing a 36.4 mm × 12.7 mm hypoechoic mass in the colon (white arrow). (B) That of the intussusceptional compartment (white arrow). (C) Abdominal CT image showing a continuous low-density tumorous lesion in the lumen of the colon. The white arrow indicates the tumor with ileum. An ileus tube was inserted approximately 2 m, and laparotomy was performed after decompression of the intestinal tract. During surgery, the ileum and mesentery of the small intestine were found to have invaginated into the colon (Fig. 2A). There was no evidence of metastases in the intraabdominal space. The Hutchinson maneuver could not release this invagination, and, so ileocecal resection with lymph node dissection was performed. Macroscopically, a 3-cm polypoid mass with a smooth surface was found in the ileum (Fig. 2B). Histopathological examination showed evidence of the growth of spindle-shaped cells, the size of which was shorter than that of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) cells (Fig. 3A and B). Also, immunohistochemical examination showed a positive immunoreaction for mouse double minute2 (MDM2; Fig. 3C), but the results were negative for cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4; Fig. 3D) and for KIT, CD34, and discovered on gist 1 (DOG1), which are diagnostic GISTs markers (Supplementary Figures S1A, S1B, and S1C, respectively). Also, the tumor tested negative for S100, alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), and desmin (Supplementary Figures S2A, S2B, and S2C, respectively) as well as for human melanin black45 (HMB45), MelanA, estrogen receptor (ER), and β-catenin (Supplementary Figures S3A, S3B, S3C, and S3D, respectively). Based on these findings, we concluded that his tumor was a de-differentiated LPS. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 19 without any complications. Also, at 16 months after the operation, no recurrence of the tumor was observed.
Figure 2

Highlights of intra and postoperative images. (A) The ileum and its mesentery had invaginated into the colon. (B) The polypoid tumor measured approximately 3 cm in diameter, having arisen from the ileum (white arrow).

Figure 3

Highlights of the microscopic images. (A, B) Hematoxylin-eosin-stained section showing evidence of the growth of spindle-shaped tumor cells. (C, D) Immunohistochemical staining reactions for MDM2 and CDK4. MDM2 was positive; and CDK4, negative (scale bar: A, C, D 100 μm B:10 μm).

Highlights of intra and postoperative images. (A) The ileum and its mesentery had invaginated into the colon. (B) The polypoid tumor measured approximately 3 cm in diameter, having arisen from the ileum (white arrow). Highlights of the microscopic images. (A, B) Hematoxylin-eosin-stained section showing evidence of the growth of spindle-shaped tumor cells. (C, D) Immunohistochemical staining reactions for MDM2 and CDK4. MDM2 was positive; and CDK4, negative (scale bar: A, C, D 100 μm B:10 μm).

Discussion

LPS is divided into the following 4 subtypes by the current World Health Organization Classification for soft tissue and bone tumors: atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated LPS; de-differentiated LPS; myxoid LPS; and pleomorphic LPS.[ The term “de-differentiated LPS” was first proposed by Evans in 1979 and is defined as the morphological progression from atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated LPS to other subtypes of LPS.[ It has been reported that de-differentiation of LPS occurs in approximately 10% of cases of well-differentiated LPS.[ De-differentiated LPS is found most frequently in the retroperitoneum of adults. It also occurs in the deep soft tissues of the limbs, trunk, mediastinum, head and neck region, and spermatic cord.[ Moreover, de-differentiated LPS is often found as a primary tumor.[ In the present case, de-differentiated primary LPS of the ileum with intussusception was extremely unusual. To the best of our knowledge, there are only 5 case reports of LPS from small bowel [ and only our report of intussusception caused by it (Table 1).
Table 1

Case reports of LPS from small bowel.

Case reports of LPS from small bowel. Various tumors of the small bowel can cause intussusception such as inflammatory fibrous polyps, lipomas, leiomyomas, metastatic lesions, leiomyosarcomas, lymphomas, carcinoid tumors, and adenocarcinomas.[ Evidence of the growth of spindle-shaped cells allowed us to suspect GISTs (Fig. 3A and B), but our immunohistochemical examination showed that the tumor was negative for KIT, CD34, and DOG-1 (Supplementary Figures S1A, S1B, and S1C, respectively) as well as for S-100, α-SMA, and Desmin denied neurinoma and myoma (Supplementary Figures S2A, S2B, and S2C, respectively). Furthermore, there was no positive immunoreaction for HMB45 and MelanA denied perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (Supplementary Figures S3A and S3B, respectively) or for ER and β-catenin denied mesenteric fibromatosis (Supplementary Figure S3C and S3D, respectively). On the other hand, MDM2, which is a helpful diagnostic marker of atypical lipomatous tumors, well-differentiated LPS, and de-differentiated ones was positive (Fig. 3C; sensitivity, 97%; specificity, 83%).[ CDK4 is also a useful marker for the diagnosis of LPS (sensitivity, 92%; specificity, 95%).[ However, in the present case, the expression of CDK4 was negative. Nonetheless, a diagnosis of LPS was made in some cases despite the negative expression of CDK4.[ We diagnosed this tumor as a de-differentiated LPS in light its positive expression of MDM2 and morphology, that is, unclear differentiation of adipose. Several immunohistochemical findings and the clinical context are necessary for a diagnosis of LPS. Under existing conditions, complete surgical resection is the first choice of treatment for LPS. Effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy is still unclear.[ Preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy was associated with improved overall survival compared with surgery alone for a patient with retroperitoneal sarcoma.[ However, in this present case, the tumor arose in the ileum and exposure to radiation would be considered unwarranted to due possible ileitis. The local recurrence of de-differentiated LPS has been reported in 40%–60% of cases, with metastases in 15%–20%.[ Hence, lymph node dissection should be performed as in the present case. At the present, 16 months after the operation, no recurrence of the tumor has occurred. In conclusion, LPS should be considered in differential diagnosis of adult intussusception; and the careful management is required, including observation, after surgery.

Acknowledgment

We are grateful for cooperation of Ryuji Aoyama and Masayuki Fujioka for diagnosis of the patients.

Author contributions

MK, KS, SY, and IM performed the patients’ care including operation. KT performed pathological investigation. MK and TK designed and drafted the manuscript. LSW and UK reviewed and revised the manuscript. Data curation: Masaya Inoue, Yasutsugu Shirai, Tatsuki Kataoka, Kohei Taniguchi, Kentaro Mstsuo. Investigation: Kentaro Matsuo, Masaya Inoue, Yasutsugu Shirai, Tatsuki Kataoka, Shuji Kagota, Kohei Taniguchi. Supervision: Kohei Taniguchi, Sang-Woong Lee, Kazuhisa Uchiyama. Writing – original draft: Kentaro Matsuo.
  12 in total

Review 1.  Liposarcomas: diagnostic pitfalls and new insights.

Authors:  Angelo P Dei Tos
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 5.087

2.  Liposarcoma: a study of 55 cases with a reassessment of its classification.

Authors:  H L Evans
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 6.394

3.  Rare case of entero-enteric intussusception caused by small bowel metastasis from a cardiac liposarcoma.

Authors:  Gustavo Gomez; Mohammad Bilal; Paul Klepchick; Kofi Clarke
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-03-15

4.  Primary liposarcoma of the jejunum.

Authors:  T Papadopoulos; T Kirchner; M Bergmann; H K Müller-Hermelink
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.250

5.  MDM2 and CDK4 immunostainings are useful adjuncts in diagnosing well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma subtypes: a comparative analysis of 559 soft tissue neoplasms with genetic data.

Authors:  Matthieu Bui Nguyen Binh; Xavier Sastre-Garau; Louis Guillou; Gonzague de Pinieux; Philippe Terrier; Réal Lagacé; Alain Aurias; Isabelle Hostein; Jean Michel Coindre
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.394

6.  Primary small bowel liposarcoma (atypical lipomatous tumour) with myogenic differentiation.

Authors:  J Patel; R Deb; W Speake; T A Macculloch
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2010-07-26

7.  Metastatic liposarcoma in the jejunum causing intussusception: report of a case.

Authors:  Yutaka Shibata; Kouhei Sato; Masashi Kodama; Hiroshi Nanjyo
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin, ifosfamide, and lenograstim for resected soft-tissue sarcoma (EORTC 62931): a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Penella J Woll; Peter Reichardt; Axel Le Cesne; Sylvie Bonvalot; Alberto Azzarelli; Harald J Hoekstra; Michael Leahy; Frits Van Coevorden; Jaap Verweij; Pancras C W Hogendoorn; Monia Ouali; Sandrine Marreaud; Vivien H C Bramwell; Peter Hohenberger
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy versus surgery alone for retroperitoneal sarcoma: a case-control, propensity score-matched analysis of a nationwide clinical oncology database.

Authors:  Daniel P Nussbaum; Christel N Rushing; Whitney O Lane; Diana M Cardona; David G Kirsch; Bercedis L Peterson; Dan G Blazer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Small bowel pleomorphic liposarcoma: a rare cause of gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Simon Nennstiel; Martin Mollenhauer; Christoph Schlag; Valentin Becker; Bruno Neu; Norbert Hüser; Ralf Gertler; Roland M Schmid; Stefan von Delius
Journal:  Case Rep Gastrointest Med       Date:  2014-08-04
View more
  3 in total

1.  Primary duodenal dedifferentiated liposarcoma: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Nah Ihm Kim; Ji Shin Lee; Chan Choi; Jong Hee Nam; Yoo Duk Choi; Hee Joon Kim; Sung Sun Kim
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 2.  Primary small bowel mesentery de-differentiated liposarcoma causing torsion with no recurrence for 5 years: A case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Kentaro Matsuo; Masaya Inoue; Yasutsugu Shirai; Tatsuki Kataoka; Shuji Kagota; Kohei Taniguchi; Sang-Woong Lee; Kazuhisa Uchiyama
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Dedifferentiated liposarcoma of small bowel mesentery: a rare case report.

Authors:  Sunil Dhakal; Ijendra Prajapati
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2022-01-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.