Literature DB >> 29901271

Stewardship of Integrity in Scientific Communication.

Kurt H Albertine1.   

Abstract

Integrity in the pursuit of discovery through application of the scientific method and reporting the results is an obligation for each of us as scientists. We cannot let the value of science be diminished because discovering knowledge is vital to understand ourselves and our impacts on the earth. We support the value of science by our stewardship of integrity in the conduct, training, reporting, and proposing of scientific investigation. The players who have these responsibilities are authors, reviewers, editors, and readers. Each role has to be played with vigilance for ethical behavior, including compliance with regulations for protections of study subjects, use of select agents and biohazards, regulations of use of stem cells, resource sharing, posting datasets to public repositories, and so on. The positive take-home message is that the scientific community is taking steps in behavior to protect the integrity of science. Anat Rec, 2018.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Anat Rec, 301:1481-1487, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ethics; publishing; scientific writing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29901271      PMCID: PMC7233303          DOI: 10.1002/ar.23858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)        ISSN: 1932-8486            Impact factor:   2.064


  17 in total

1.  Science publishing: The trouble with retractions.

Authors:  Richard Van Noorden
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?

Authors:  R Grant Steen
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Scientists behaving badly.

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; Melissa S Anderson; Raymond de Vries
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Retraction rates are on the rise.

Authors:  Murat Cokol; Fatih Ozbay; Raul Rodriguez-Esteban
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  Repairing research integrity.

Authors:  Sandra L Titus; James A Wells; Lawrence J Rhoades
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Data integrity, reliability and fraud in medical research.

Authors:  Mark Otto Baerlocher; Jeremy O'Brien; Marshall Newton; Tina Gautam; Jason Noble
Journal:  Eur J Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 4.487

7.  Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications.

Authors:  Ferric C Fang; R Grant Steen; Arturo Casadevall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Shaping the Future of Research: a perspective from junior scientists.

Authors:  Gary S McDowell; Kearney T W Gunsalus; Drew C MacKellar; Sarah A Mazzilli; Vaibhav P Pai; Patricia R Goodwin; Erica M Walsh; Avi Robinson-Mosher; Thomas A Bowman; James Kraemer; Marcella L Erb; Eldi Schoenfeld; Leila Shokri; Jonathan D Jackson; Ayesha Islam; Matthew D Mattozzi; Kristin A Krukenberg; Jessica K Polka
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2014-11-28

9.  How to make more published research true.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Why has the number of scientific retractions increased?

Authors:  R Grant Steen; Arturo Casadevall; Ferric C Fang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.