Literature DB >> 29900806

Water Fluoridation and Dental Caries in U.S. Children and Adolescents.

G D Slade1, W B Grider2, W R Maas3, A E Sanders1.   

Abstract

Fluoridation of America's drinking water was among the great public health achievements of the 20th century. Yet there is a paucity of studies from the past 3 decades investigating its dental health benefits in the U.S. POPULATION: This cross-sectional study sought to evaluate associations between availability of community water fluoridation (CWF) and dental caries experience in the U.S. child and adolescent population. County-level estimates of the percentage of population served by CWF (% CWF) from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Water Fluoridation Reporting System were merged with dental examination data from 10 y of National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (1999 to 2004 and 2011 to 2014). Dental caries experience in the primary dentition (decayed and filled tooth surfaces [dfs]) was calculated for 7,000 children aged 2 to 8 y and in the permanent dentition (decayed, missing, and filled tooth surfaces [DMFS]) for 12,604 children and adolescents aged 6 to 17 y. Linear regression models estimated associations between % CWF and dental caries experience with adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics: age, sex, race/ethnicity, rural-urban location, head-of-household education, and period since last dental visit. Sensitivity analysis excluded counties fluoridated after 1998. In unadjusted analysis, caries experience in the primary dentition was lower in counties with ≥75% CWF (mean dfs = 3.3; 95% confidence limit [CL] = 2.8, 3.7) than in counties with <75% CWF (mean dfs = 4.6; 95% CL = 3.9, 5.4), a prevented fraction of 30% (95% CL = 11, 48). The difference was also statistically significant, although less pronounced, in the permanent dentition: mean DMFS (95% CL) was 2.2 (2.0, 2.4) and 1.9 (1.8, 2.1), respectively, representing a prevented fraction of 12% (95% CL = 1, 23). Statistically significant associations likewise were seen when % CWF was modeled as a continuum, and differences tended to increase in covariate-adjusted analysis and in sensitivity analysis. These findings confirm a substantial caries-preventive benefit of CWF for U.S. children and that the benefit is most pronounced in primary teeth.

Entities:  

Keywords:  United States; dental health surveys; drinking water; epidemiology; primary prevention; public health dentistry

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29900806      PMCID: PMC6169031          DOI: 10.1177/0022034518774331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  17 in total

Review 1.  The importance of the normality assumption in large public health data sets.

Authors:  Thomas Lumley; Paula Diehr; Scott Emerson; Lu Chen
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2001-10-25       Impact factor: 21.981

2.  Critique of the review of 'Water fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries' published by the Cochrane Collaboration in 2015.

Authors:  A J Rugg-Gunn; A J Spencer; H P Whelton; C Jones; J F Beal; P Castle; P V Cooney; J Johnson; M P Kelly; M A Lennon; J McGinley; D O'Mullane; H D Sgan-Cohen; P P Sharma; W M Thomson; S M Woodward; S P Zusman
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Overview and quality assurance for the oral health component of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2009-2010.

Authors:  Bruce A Dye; Xianfen Li; Brenda G Lewis; Tim Iafolla; Eugenio D Beltran-Aguilar; Paul I Eke
Journal:  J Public Health Dent       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 1.821

4.  Effectiveness of water fluoridation in caries prevention.

Authors:  Andrew J Rugg-Gunn; Loc Do
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.383

Review 5.  Water fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries.

Authors:  Zipporah Iheozor-Ejiofor; Helen V Worthington; Tanya Walsh; Lucy O'Malley; Jan E Clarkson; Richard Macey; Rahul Alam; Peter Tugwell; Vivian Welch; Anne-Marie Glenny
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-06-18

6.  Science, Politics, and Communication: The Case of Community Water Fluoridation in the US.

Authors:  Myron Allukian; Olivia D Carter-Pokras; Barbara F Gooch; Alice M Horowitz; Hiroko Iida; Matt Jacob; Dushanka V Kleinman; Jayanth Kumar; William R Maas; Howard Pollick; R Gary Rozier
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 3.797

7.  Oral health status of second grade school children in upstate New York.

Authors:  J V Kumar; E L Green; C Coluccio; R Davenport
Journal:  N Y State Dent J       Date:  2001-02

8.  Patterns of beverage use across the lifecycle.

Authors:  Barry M Popkin
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-01-04

9.  Blood Lead Levels and Dental Caries in U.S. Children Who Do Not Drink Tap Water.

Authors:  Anne E Sanders; Gary D Slade
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Development and status of the National Oral Health Surveillance System.

Authors:  Dolores M Malvitz; Laurie K Barker; Kathy R Phipps
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  The additional benefit of professional fluoride application for children as an adjunct to regular fluoride toothpaste: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lintong Yu; Xueqian Yu; Yueyang Li; Fengjiao Yang; Jialan Hong; Danchen Qin; Guangtai Song; Fang Hua
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Water fluoridation confirmed to prevent dental decay in US children and adolescents.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Association Between Water Fluoridation and Income-Related Dental Caries of US Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Anne E Sanders; William B Grider; William R Maas; John A Curiel; Gary D Slade
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 16.193

4.  Emulation of Community Water Fluoridation Coverage Across US Counties.

Authors:  J A Curiel; A E Sanders; G D Slade
Journal:  JDR Clin Trans Res       Date:  2019-11-25

5.  Disparities in dental health issues and oral health care visits in US children with tobacco smoke exposure.

Authors:  E Melinda Mahabee-Gittens; Harold A Smith; Ashley L Merianos
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 3.634

6.  Caries risk assessment-related knowledge, attitude, and behaviors among Chinese dentists: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Xiaolin Fang; Fang Hua; Zhi Chen; Lu Zhang
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 3.606

7.  A Case-Control Study of Fluoridation and Osteosarcoma.

Authors:  F M Kim; C Hayes; S L Burgard; H D Kim; R N Hoover; C W Douglass; D Couper
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 6.116

8.  Oral health and related risk indicators in north-central Appalachia differ by rurality.

Authors:  Yuqiao Zhou; Richard Cuddy; Daniel W McNeil; Casey D Wright; Richard J Crout; Eleanor Feingold; Katherine Neiswanger; Mary L Marazita; John R Shaffer
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 2.489

9.  Impact of water fluoridation on dental caries decline across racial and income subgroups of Brazilian adolescents.

Authors:  Rafael Aiello Bomfim; Paulo Frazão
Journal:  Epidemiol Health       Date:  2022-01-03

Review 10.  Principles of fluoride toxicity and the cellular response: a review.

Authors:  Nichole R Johnston; Scott A Strobel
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 5.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.