| Literature DB >> 29900383 |
G U Fayomi1,2, O Wusu3, S E Mini2, O S I Fayomi4,5, O Kilanko4.
Abstract
This study focused on a comparative analysis of exposure to pollution in Ota and Ewekoro Township where we have concentration of industries that emits pollutant to the air. This was with a view to proffer solution to the negative effects of industrial activities on residents within industrial location. The study involved empirical observation and interview of residents. About 652 questionnaires were administered randomly on the residents. Analysis involved descriptive statistical tools including chi-square techniques. The results suggest that air pollution was most frequently reported in Ewekoro and Ota and this can help in the prediction of stringent factor in which industrial activities could pose to society.Entities:
Keywords: Eco-system; Emission; Industrial zone; Pollution
Year: 2018 PMID: 29900383 PMCID: PMC5997909 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.05.078
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Data on percentage distribution of respondents by socio-economic and physical characteristics.
| Ota | % | Ewekoro | Total | Percentage | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15–19 | 20 | 6 | 19 | 6 | 39 | 6 |
| 20–24 | 54 | 17 | 43 | 13 | 97 | 15 |
| 25–29 | 66 | 22 | 102 | 31 | 168 | 26 |
| 30–34 | 57 | 18 | 83 | 25 | 140 | 21 |
| 35–39 | 26 | 8 | 32 | 9 | 58 | 9 |
| 40–44 | 31 | 9 | 15 | 5 | 46 | 7 |
| 45+ | 45 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 56 | 8 |
| No response | 21 | 6 | 27 | 8 | 48 | 7 |
| Total | 320 | 100 | 332 | 100 | 652 | 100 |
| Male | 191 | 59 | 141 | 46 | 345 | 53 |
| Female | 118 | 36 | 175 | 53 | 293 | 45 |
| No response | 11 | 4 | 3 | 0.9 | 14 | 2 |
| Total | 320 | 100 | 329 | 100 | 652 | 100 |
| Catholic Christians | 124 | 38 | 199 | 59 | 323 | 50 |
| Non Catholic Christians | 162 | 51 | 60 | 18 | 222 | 34 |
| No response | 34 | 11 | 73 | 22 | 107 | 16 |
| Total | 320 | 100 | 332 | 100 | 652 | 100 |
| SSCE | 111 | 35 | 91 | 27 | 202 | 31 |
| Tertiary Education | 181 | 56 | 227 | 68 | 408 | 63 |
| No response | 28 | 8 | 14 | 4 | 42 | 6 |
| Total | 320 | 100 | 332 | 100 | 652 | 100 |
| 5000–15,000 | 49 | 15 | 24 | 7 | 73 | 11 |
| 16,000–25,000 | 69 | 22 | 80 | 24 | 149 | 23 |
| 26,000–35,000 | 67 | 21 | 75 | 23 | 142 | 22 |
| 36,000–45,000 | 34 | 11 | 55 | 16 | 89 | 14 |
| 46,000–55,000 | 16 | 5 | 24 | 7 | 40 | 6 |
| 56,000–65,000 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 13 | 2 |
| 66,000+ | 37 | 12 | 26 | 8 | 63 | 9 |
| No response | 40 | 13 | 43 | 13 | 83 | 13 |
| Total | 320 | 100 | 332 | 100 | 652 | 100 |
| Tenement apartment | 135 | 42 | 199 | 59 | 334 | 52 |
| 2b/r flat | 88 | 27 | 109 | 33 | 197 | 31 |
| Others | 77 | 24 | 20 | 6 | 97 | 14 |
| No response | 20 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 22 | 3 |
| Total | 320 | 100 | 332 | 100 | 652 | 100 |
| Less than 100 m | 79 | 29 | 57 | 17 | 136 | 21 |
| 100–549 m | 140 | 44 | 168 | 51 | 316 | 48 |
| 550–999 m | 32 | 10 | 29 | 6 | 61 | 9 |
| 1 km+ | 50 | 16 | 63 | 18 | 113 | 17 |
| No response | 19 | 6 | 15 | 5 | 34 | 5 |
| Total | 320 | 100 | 332 | 100 | 652 | 100 |
Data on percentage distribution of respondents by causes of pollution in Ota and Ewekoro.
| Causes of pollution | Ota No | % | Ewekoro No | % | Total | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other causes | 39 | 13 | 3 | 0.9 | 42 | 7 |
| Industrial causes | 263 | 83 | 321 | 95 | 584 | 89 |
| No response | 11 | 4 | 15 | 4 | 26 | 4 |
| Total | 320 | 100 | 332 | 100 | 652 | 100 |
Data on the percentage distribution of respondents by types of pollution in Ota and Ewekoro.
| Common types of pollution | Ota | % | Ewekoro | % | Total | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air pollution | 154 | 48 | 172 | 52 | 326 | 50 |
| Noise pollution | 52 | 16 | 113 | 34 | 165 | 25 |
| Water pollution | 11 | 4 | 33 | 9 | 44 | 7 |
| Air and noise pollution | 64 | 20 | 9 | 3 | 73 | 11 |
| All the above | 28 | 8 | 2 | 0.6 | 30 | 5 |
| No response | 11 | 4 | 3 | 0.9 | 14 | 2 |
| Total | 320 | 100 | 332 | 100 | 652 | 100 |
Data on the perception of the rate of various types of pollution in Ota and Ewekoro.
| Air pollution rate | Ota N | % | Ewekoro N | % | Total | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| None | 4 | 2 | 0.3 | 5 | 0.7 | |
| Low | 23 | 7 | 15 | 5 | 38 | 6 |
| Medium | 79 | 25 | 81 | 24 | 160 | 25 |
| High | 160 | 50 | 180 | 54 | 340 | 52 |
| No response | 54 | 16 | 55 | 16 | 109 | 17 |
| Total | 320 | 100 | 332 | 100 | 652 | 100 |
| Noise pollution rate | ||||||
| None | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0.6 | 8 | 2 |
| Low | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | 33 | 5 |
| Medium | 92 | 28 | 139 | 42 | 231 | 35 |
| High | 117 | 36 | 73 | 22 | 190 | 29 |
| No response | 85 | 26 | 105 | 31 | 190 | 29 |
| Total | 320 | 100 | 332 | 100 | 652 | 100 |
| Water pollution rate | ||||||
| None | 49 | 15 | 7 | 2 | 56 | 8 |
| Low | 76 | 23 | 69 | 21 | 145 | 22 |
| Medium | 45 | 14 | 64 | 19 | 109 | 16 |
| High | 17 | 5 | 57 | 17 | 74 | 11 |
| No response | 133 | 41 | 135 | 41 | 268 | 41 |
| Total | 320 | 100 | 332 | 100 | 652 | 100 |
Fig. 1Roof cover with cement dust.
Fig. 2Smoke released into the air from industrial activities in Ota industrial estate.
| Subject area | |
|---|---|
| More specific subject area | |
| Type of data | |
| How data was acquired | For the purpose of these research works, a systematic sampling technique was used. This involved selecting every 10houses in Major Street and every 5 houses in Minor Street. In Ota, 20 major street and 13minor street was selected making a total of 320 for Ota and 332 questionnaire administered for Ewekoro township. |
| Data format | Raw, Analyzed |
| Experimental factors | A number of 68 streets were surveyed in the two study area where every 10 houses were selected at random in long streets and 5 houses in short street to make a total of 652 houses as the sample size. |
| Experimental features | The primary sources of data collection in this study involves the use of various methods of data collection of information such as the use of questionnaire, direct interviews, personal observation and the use of photographs. The data sources were utilized to ensure comprehensive exploration of this study. |
| Data source location | Ewekoro and Ota industrial zone |
| Data accessibility | Data are available within this article |