| Literature DB >> 29900355 |
Hamed Biglari1, Mehdi Saeidi2, Kamaleddin Karimyan3,4, Mohammad Reza Narooie5, Hooshmand Sharafi6.
Abstract
Detection of Hydrogeological and Hydro-geochemical changes affecting the quality of aquifer water is very important. The aim of this study was to determine the factor analysis of the hydro-geochemical characteristics of Iranshahr underground water resources during the warm and cool seasons. In this study, 248 samples (two-time repetitions) of ground water resources were provided at first by cluster-random sampling method during 2017 in the villages of Iranshahr city. After transferring the samples to the laboratory, concentrations of 13 important chemical parameters in those samples were determined according to o water and wastewater standard methods. The results of this study indicated that 45.45% and 55.55% of the correlation between parameters has had a significant decrease and increase, respectively with the transition from warm seasons to cold seasons. According to the factor analysis method, three factors of land hydro-geochemical processes, supplying resources by surface water and sewage as well as human activities have been identified as influential on the chemical composition of these resources.The highest growth rate of 0.37 was observed between phosphate and nitrate ions while the lowest trend of - 0.33 was seen between fluoride ion and calcium as well as chloride ions. Also, a significant increase in the correlation between magnesium ion and nitrate ion from warm seasons to cold seasons indicates the high seasonal impact of the relation between these two parameters.Entities:
Keywords: Correlation matrix; Factor analysis; Groundwater resources; Hydro-geochemistry; Iranshahr
Year: 2018 PMID: 29900355 PMCID: PMC5997880 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.05.039
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
The correlation of each ions with other ions in spring and summer, 2017.
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| 3 | 0.34 | 0.61 | 0.34 | 0.61 | 1 | |||||||||||
| 4 | 0.58 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.58 | 1 | ||||||||||
| 5 | 0.44 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.44 | 0.72 | 1 | |||||||||
| 6 | 0.01 | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.35 | 0.34 | 0.01 | 1 | ||||||||
| 7 | −0.09 | 0.17 | 0.12 | 0.12 | −0.09 | 0.13 | 0.17 | −0.08 | 1 | |||||||
| 8 | −0.11 | 0.43 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.43 | 0.15 | 0.07 | 0.19 | −0.11 | 1 | ||||||
| 9 | 0.01 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.20 | 0.68 | 0.31 | 0.42 | 0.19 | 0.01 | 1 | |||||
| 10 | −0.10 | 0.59 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.32 | 0.51 | 0.44 | 0.59 | −0.10 | 0.16 | 0.41 | 1 | ||||
| 11 | 0.10 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.66 | 0.96 | 0.71 | 0.31 | 0.10 | 0.19 | 0.59 | 0.37 | 1 | |||
| 12 | −0.07 | 0.55 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.04 | 0.32 | 0.55 | -0.07 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.14 | 0.40 | 0.22 | 1 | ||
| 13 | −0.19 | 0.25 | −0.01 | −0.01 | −0.02 | −0.01 | −0.03 | 0.24 | −0.11 | −0.19 | 0.11 | 0.25 | −0.10 | 0.10 | 1 | |
| The average of rows and columns for each ion | 4.12 | 4.26 | 2.93 | 4.17 | 3.47 | 2.54 | 1.19 | 1.64 | 3.17 | 3.20 | 3.98 | 2.26 | 1.11 | |||
The correlation of each ions with other ions in spring and summer, 2017.
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| 3 | 0.3 | 140.14/0 | 0.14 | 0.30 | 1 | |||||||||||
| 4 | 0.97 | 0.25 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.25 | 1 | ||||||||||
| 5 | 0.96 | 0.26 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.26 | 0.89 | 1 | |||||||||
| 6 | 0.34 | 0.07 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.34 | 0.07 | 0.19 | 1 | ||||||||
| 7 | 0.37 | −0.05 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.01 | 0.30 | 0.37 | −0.05 | 1 | |||||||
| 8 | 0.26 | −0.13 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 0.20 | 0.24 | −0.31 | 0.26 | 1 | ||||||
| 9 | 0.54 | −0.13 | 0.54 | 0.54 | −0.13 | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0.31 | 0.29 | 0 | 1 | |||||
| 10 | 0.83 | −0.08 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.20 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.43 | 0.31 | −0.08 | 0.83 | 1 | ||||
| 11 | 0.96 | 0.19 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.40 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.19 | 0.29 | 0.22 | 0.30 | 0.44 | 1 | |||
| 12 | 0.59 | −0.2 | 0.36 | 0.36 | −0.07 | 0.34 | 0.38 | −0.20 | 0.34 | 0.59 | 0.46 | 0.19 | 0.26 | 1 | ||
| 13 | 0.19 | −0.01 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.04 | −0.01 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.19 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 1 | |
| The average of rows and columns for each ion | 4.18 | 4.26 | 1.82 | 4.03 | 4.16 | 1.71 | 2.41 | 1.83 | 3.11 | 3.96 | 3.96 | 2.53 | 1.33 | |||
Maximum, minimum, mean, standard deviation and out of range for each element in Iranshahr, 2017.
| Fe+2 | K+ | Na+ | Mg+2 | Ca+2 | PO4−3 | NO3− | HCO3− | SO4−2 | CL− | F− | TDS | EC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.024 | 12 | 10.65 | 39.36 | 480.80 | 0.36 | 28 | 431.88 | 880 | 954 | 1.72 | 3078 | 4810 | |
| 0.011 | 4.54 | 269.83 | 17.24 | 72.87 | 0.11 | 14.62 | 240.07 | 247.74 | 245.16 | 0.63 | 1038.93 | 1623.54 | |
| 0.000 | 2 | 65 | 4.8 | 16 | 0.04 | 6.16 | 102.48 | 40 | 39.70 | 0.25 | 276 | 432 | |
| 0.005 | 2.20 | 190.38 | 8.43 | 62.09 | 0.05 | 4.68 | 83.36 | 154.18 | 177.94 | 0.26 | 567.05 | 886 | |
| 0 | – | 59.68 | 0 | 1.61 | – | 0 | – | 16.13 | 9.68 | 22.58 | 11.29 | – | |
| 0.09 | 30 | 997 | 67.68 | 155.20 | 0.61 | 30 | 400.16 | 1000 | 883 | 1.18 | 3130 | 4890 | |
| 0.02 | 5.46 | 284.90 | 21.07 | 65.17 | 0.155 | 14.62 | 242.28 | 277.41 | 270.32 | 0.46 | 1060.01 | 1657.40 | |
| 0 | 1 | 5 | 1.92 | 11.20 | 0 | 7 | 85.4 | 50 | 35 | 0.10 | 241 | 376 | |
| 0.017 | 4.92 | 182.14 | 14.56 | 36.38 | 0.108 | 5.57 | 76.93 | 204.93 | 182.42 | 0.22 | 578.99 | 903.43 | |
| 0 | – | 67.74 | 3.32 | 0 | – | 0 | – | 20.97 | 12.90 | 9.06 | 12.90 | – | |
The result of subtracting the sum of each row and column for each parameter in order to determine the rate of progression or reversal of the correlation matrix and the relationship between the parameters by passing the warm seasons to the cold seasons, 2017.
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
| 3 | −0.33 | 0 | −0.20 | −0.30 | 0 | |||||||||||
| 4 | −0.33 | 0 | −0.01 | −0.01 | −0.33 | 0 | ||||||||||
| 5 | −0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 | −0.18 | 0.17 | 0 | |||||||||
| 6 | −0.27 | 0.18 | −0.16 | −0.16 | −0.01 | −0.27 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| 7 | 0 | 0.2 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 0.17 | 0.2 | 0.03 | 0 | |||||||
| 8 | −0.5 | 0.37 | 0.04 | 0.04 | −0.33 | 0.05 | 0.17 | −0.50 | 0.37 | 0 | ||||||
| 9 | −0.33 | 0.20 | −0.10 | −0.10 | −0.33 | −.0.18 | 0.20 | −0.11 | 0.10 | −0.01 | 0 | |||||
| 10 | −0.30 | 0.42 | 0.11 | 0.11 | −0.30 | 0.08 | 0.15 | −0.16 | 0.41 | −0.24 | 0.42 | 0 | ||||
| 11 | −0.29 | 0.22 | −0.01 | −0.01 | −0.26 | −0.33 | 0.22 | −0.29 | 0.19 | 0.03 | −0.29 | 0.07 | 0 | |||
| 12 | −0.21 | 0.53 | 0.10 | 0.01 | −0.11 | 0.01 | −0.17 | −0.13 | 0.29 | 0.53 | 0.23 | −0.21 | −0.4 | 0 | ||
| 13 | −0.25 | 0.24 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.07 | −0.25 | 0.18 | 0.24 | −0.04 | −0.06 | 0.13 | −0.04 | 0 | |
The values of each factor along with the presentation of the relationship between them.
| −0.293 | 0.930 | 0.930 | −0.293 | −0.070 | 0.996 | |
| −0.718 | 0.313 | 0.253 | −0.710 | 0.330 | 0.633 | |
| −0.276 | 0.886 | 0.336 | −.276 | 0.886 | 0.953 | |
| −0.299 | 0.276 | 0.276 | −0.299 | 0.086 | 0.210 | |
| 0.210 | 0.687 | 0.678 | 0.210 | 0.210 | 0.489 | |
| −0.792 | 0.329 | 0.270 | −0.792 | 0.329 | 1 | |
| −0.318 | 0.666 | 0.666 | −0.318 | 0.378 | 0.618 | |
| −0.329 | 0.612 | 0.612 | −0.330 | 0.483 | 0.597 | |
| −0.320 | 0.190 | 0.190 | −0.320 | −0.005 | 0.236 | |
| −0.059 | 0.466 | 0.466 | −0.059 | 0.442 | 0.535 | |
| 0.088 | 0.175 | −0.088 | −0.051 | 0.175 | 0.080 | |
| −0.446 | 0.724 | 0.724 | −0.466 | 0.09 | 0.733 | |
| −0.610 | 0.494 | 0.494 | −0.610 | 0.316 | 0.836 | |
| −0.063 | 0.727 | 0.728 | −0.063 | 0.199 | 0.636 | |
| −0.347 | 0.797 | 0.797 | −0.347 | −0.129 | 0.682 | |
| 0.148 | 0.461 | 0.461 | 0.379 | 0.148 | 0.431 | |
| −0.454 | 0.723 | 0.723 | −0.454 | 0.196 | 0.676 | |
| −0.505 | 0.612 | 0.612 | −.505 | 0.029 | 0.607 | |
| −0.261 | 0.531 | 0.513 | −0.261 | 0.492 | 0.734 | |
| −0.040 | 0.432 | 0.184 | 0.424 | −0.042 | 0.716 | |
| −0.316 | 0.354 | 0.254 | −0.316 | 0.354 | 0.776 | |
| −0.817 | 0.176 | −0.124 | −0.817 | 0.176 | 0.763 | |
Testing the t-value of the values of r obtained to determine whether there is a correlation or acceptable relation between the variables.
| 1 | * | * | * | |||||||||||||
| 2 | * | * | * | * | ||||||||||||
| 3 | 2.80 | 5.96 | 2.80 | 5.96 | * | |||||||||||
| 4 | 5.51 | 38.14 | 38.14 | 38.14 | 5.51 | * | ||||||||||
| 5 | 3.79 | 9.65 | 9.65 | 9.65 | 3.79 | 8.03 | * | |||||||||
| 6 | 0.077 | 3.28 | 3.28 | 3.28 | 2.89 | 2.80 | 0.077 | * | ||||||||
| 7 | −0.70 | 1.33 | 0.93 | 0.93 | −0.70 | 1.01 | 1.33 | -0.62 | * | |||||||
| 8 | −0.85 | 3.68 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 3.69 | 1.17 | 0.54 | 1.49 | −0.85 | * | ||||||
| 9 | 0.077 | 7.18 | 6.45 | 6.45 | 1.58 | 7.18 | 2.52 | 3.58 | 1.49 | 0.077 | * | |||||
| 10 | −0.778 | 5.66 | 4.84 | 4.84 | 2.61 | 4.59 | 3.79 | 5.66 | −0.77 | 1.25 | 3.48 | * | ||||
| 11 | 0.778 | 30.90 | 30.90 | 30.90 | 6.80 | 26.55 | 7.81 | 2.52 | 0.77 | 1.49 | 5.66 | 3.08 | * | |||
| 12 | −0.54 | 5.10 | 2.89 | 2.89 | 0.31 | 2.70 | 5.10 | −0.54 | 0.38 | 0.46 | 1.09 | 3.38 | 1.74 | * | ||
| 13 | −1.49 | 2.00 | −0.977 | −0.077 | −0.15 | −0.077 | −0.23 | 1.91 | −0.85 | −1.49 | 0.85 | 2.00 | −0.77 | 0.77 | * | |
* The correlation between these parameters it were 100 percent, so t-factor for these parameters is not calculate.
Testing the values of t-factors relative to “r” values obtained to determine whether there is a correlation or acceptable relation between variables.
| 1 | * | * | * | |||||||||||||
| 2 | * | * | * | * | ||||||||||||
| 3 | 1.09 | 2.43 | 1.09 | 2.43 | * | |||||||||||
| 4 | 2.00 | 30.90 | 30.90 | 30.90 | 2.00 | * | ||||||||||
| 5 | 2.08 | 26.55 | 26.55 | 26.55 | 2.08 | 15.12 | * | |||||||||
| 6 | 0.54 | 2.80 | 1.83 | 1.83 | 2.80 | 0.54 | 1.49 | * | ||||||||
| 7 | −0.38 | 3.08 | 2.61 | 2.61 | 0.077 | 2.43 | 3.08 | −0.38 | * | |||||||
| 8 | −2.52 | 2.08 | 1.58 | 1.58 | 0.77 | 1.58 | 1.91 | −2.52 | 2.08 | * | ||||||
| 9 | −1.01 | 4.97 | 4.97 | 4.97 | −1.01 | 4.47 | 4.50 | 2.52 | 2.34 | 0.00 | * | |||||
| 10 | −0.62 | 11.52 | 6.45 | 6.45 | 0.15 | 5.66 | 5.66 | 3.68 | 2.52 | −0.62 | 11.52 | * | ||||
| 11 | 1.49 | 26.55 | 26.55 | 26.55 | 3.38 | 19.59 | 19.59 | 1.49 | 2.34 | 1.74 | 2.43 | 3.79 | * | |||
| 12 | −1.58 | 5.66 | 2.98 | 2.98 | −0.54 | 2.80 | 3.18 | −1.58 | 2.80 | 5.66 | 4.01 | 1.49 | 2.08 | * | ||
| 13 | −0.77 | 1.49 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.15 | 0.38 | 0.31 | −0.077 | 0.54 | 0.38 | 0.54 | 1.49 | 0.23 | 0.46 | * | |
* The correlation between these parameters it were 100 percent, so t-factor for these parameters is not calculate.
Fig. 1The X and Y charts of the operational data drawn in the first half of 2017.
Fig. 2Iranshahr location in the Sistan and Baluchistan, Iran.
Fig. 3Fluoride (a) and (b) Total hardness distribution in Iranshahr groundwater׳s, 2017.
Fig. 4Magnesium (a) and Nitrate (b) distribution in Iranshahr groundwater׳s, 2017.
Fig. 5Total Dissolve Solid (a) and Chlorine (b) distribution in Iranshahr groundwater׳s, 2017.
Fig. 6Sulfate (a) and Sodium (b) distribution in Iranshahr groundwater׳s, 2017.
Fig. 7Calcium (a) and Water type (b) distribution in Iranshahr groundwater׳s, 2017.
Fig. 8Water type in groundwater resources at the first (a) and second half of seasons, 2017.
| Subject area | Environmental sciences |
| More specific subject area | Chemistry |
| Type of data | Tables and figures |
| How data was acquired | The data were collected by 248 samples from groundwater sources during 2017 in the villages of Iranshahr county. The concentrations of 13 important chemical parameters in those samples, including temporary and permanent hardness, calcium and magnesium, iron, nitrate, alkalinity, sulfate and chloride were determined. |
| Data format | Raw, analyzed |
| Experimental factors | All water samples in polyethylene bottles were stored in a dark place at room temperature until them analysed. |
| Experimental features | In this study, all of mentioned parameters in abstract part were analyzed according to the standard methods for water and wastewater treatment handbook. |
| Data source location | Iranshahr county, Sistan and Baluchestan province, Iran |
| Data accessibility | Data are included in this article |