| Literature DB >> 29900243 |
T A Adagunodo1, O S Hammed2, M R Usikalu1, W A Ayara1, R Ravisankar3.
Abstract
This article consists the in situ data sets of activity concentrations of radionuclides (K-40, Th-232 and U-238) and gamma radiation dose rates measured about 1 m above a kaolinitic terrain in Ifonyintedo, Dahomey Basin, SW Nigeria. Nineteen (19) data points were randomly occupied at the lower axis of the kaolin field using a hand-held detector known as Super-Spec (RS 125). At each data point, the measurements were taken four times, while their averages and standard deviations were estimated in order to ensure accuracy. The radiometric survey was carried out between December, 2017 and January, 2018. The data sets were processed and analyzed via a descriptive statistics. The data can be explored further by estimating the radiological risks to the miners on the field, and to correlate the activity concentrations of the data with the activity concentrations of the tiles that are produced from the kaolin deposits in Ifonyintedo. Furthermore, the data from this article could be compared with other data acquired over a kaolinitic terrain across the globe.Entities:
Keywords: Dahomey Basin; Dose rate; Ifonyintedo; Kaolin; Potassium; Thorium; Tiles; Uranium
Year: 2018 PMID: 29900243 PMCID: PMC5996398 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.03.088
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Activity concentrations and dose rates of each location in a kaolinitic terrain.
| Sample | U-238 (Bq/kg) | Th-232 (Bq/kg) | K-40 (Bq/kg) | Dose rates (nGy/h) | Longitude | Latitude | Elev. (m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LA1 | 37.05±0.02 | 65.77±0.24 | 187.8±3.12 | 63.38±6.36 | 002° 47.567′ E | 006° 46.094′ N | 89 |
| LA2 | 28.41±0.01 | 75.92±0.30 | 156.5±3.53 | 64.39±0.84 | 002° 47.572′ E | 006° 46.092′ N | 87 |
| LA3 | 48.17±0.01 | 73.08±0.22 | 125.2±4.28 | 70.00±1.95 | 002° 47.570′ E | 006° 46.089′ N | 83 |
| LA4 | 116.09±0.02 | 77.95±0.13 | 93.9±6.99 | 101.22±5.50 | 002° 47.569′ E | 006° 46.083′ N | 90 |
| LA5 | 43.23±0.01 | 77.14±0.11 | 125.2±3.24 | 70.27±9.20 | 002° 47.567′ E | 006° 46.077′ N | 89 |
| LA6 | 51.87±0.03 | 73.49±0.26 | 156.5±1.94 | 73.16±1.21 | 002° 47.567′ E | 006° 46.072′ N | 83 |
| LA7 | 11.12±0.03 | 58.06±0.35 | 156.5±0.22 | 46.15±4.60 | 002° 47.568′ E | 006° 46.066′ N | 86 |
| LA8 | 24.70±0.03 | 62.52±0.14 | 93.9±0.36 | 52.14±2.84 | 002° 47.572′ E | 006° 46.068′ N | 88 |
| LA9 | 34.58±0.01 | 68.21±0.20 | 125.2±1.49 | 61.15±4.11 | 002° 47.576′ E | 006° 46.072′ N | 86 |
| LA10 | 53.11±0.02 | 60.49±0.17 | 62.6±4.21 | 62.00±6.90 | 002° 47.576′ E | 006° 46.074′ N | 89 |
| LA11 | 43.23±0.01 | 76.73±0.39 | 125.2±0.55 | 70.03±3.20 | 002° 47.575′ E | 006° 46.078′ N | 89 |
| LA12 | 53.11±0.01 | 98.25±0.18 | 187.8±0.43 | 89.84±1.10 | 002° 47.573′ E | 006° 46.076′ N | 91 |
| LA13 | 39.52±0.02 | 90.13±0.26 | 31.3±0.38 | 72.53±1.50 | 002° 47.570′ E | 006° 46.076′ N | 88 |
| LA14 | 37.05±0.02 | 73.49±0.35 | 31.3±0.65 | 61.48±5.36 | 002° 47.560′ E | 006° 46.060′ N | 91 |
| LA15 | 58.01±0.01 | 76.73±0.15 | 62.6±2.68 | 73.88±4.95 | 002° 47.560′ E | 006° 46.077′ N | 91 |
| LA16 | 54.34±0.03 | 59.68±0.26 | 93.9±1.50 | 63.36±4.55 | 002° 47.539′ E | 006° 46.059′ N | 89 |
| LA17 | 40.76±0.01 | 65.37±0.33 | 31.3±1.00 | 58.23±0.60 | 002° 47.533′ E | 006° 46.054′ N | 89 |
| LA18 | 61.75±0.01 | 62.93±0.11 | 93.9±0.24 | 68.53±1.19 | 002° 47.533′ E | 006° 46.075′ N | 86 |
| LA19 | 50.64±0.01 | 67.40±0.11 | 125.2±2.50 | 67.67±1.21 | 002° 47.555′ E | 006° 46.073′ N | 86 |
Fig. 1Lower axis of kaolin deposit field in Ifonyintedo.
Fig. 2Geology of Nigeria revealing the geological domain of Ifonyintedo, Ogun state.
Descriptive statistics for the gamma radiation and dose rates (SET I).
| Sample | ∑N | Mean | SD | SEM | Variance | Sum | Skewness | Kurtosis | USS | CSS | CV | MAD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U-238 | 19 | 46.67 | 20.93 | 4.80 | 438.01 | 886.70 | 1.86 | 6.66 | 49267.82 | 7884.13 | 0.45 | 13.38 |
| Th-232 | 19 | 71.76 | 10.31 | 2.37 | 106.298 | 1363.00 | 1.00 | 1.24 | 99740.62 | 1913.36 | 0.14 | 7.93 |
| K-40 | 19 | 108.73 | 49.34 | 11.32 | 2434.90 | 2066.00 | −0.14 | −0.81 | 268435.06 | 43828.24 | 0.45 | 40.40 |
| DR | 19 | 67.86 | 12.21 | 2.80 | 148.98 | 1289.00 | 1.10 | 2.62 | 90184.92 | 2681.67 | 0.18 | 8.28 |
Descriptive statistics for the gamma radiation and dose rates (SET II).
| Sample | ∑N | GM | GSD | Mode | SW | Minimum | Imax. | Q1 | Median | Q3 | Maximum | Imax. | IR | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U-238 | 19 | 42.57 | 1.59 | 37.05 | 19 | 11.12 | 8 | 37.05 | 43.23 | 53.11 | 116.09 | 5 | 16.06 | 104.98 |
| Th-232 | 19 | 71.10 | 1.14 | 73.49 | 19 | 58.06 | 8 | 62.93 | 73.08 | 76.73 | 98.25 | 13 | 13.80 | 40.19 |
| K-40 | 19 | 95.15 | 1.79 | 125.20 | 19 | 31.30 | 14 | 62.60 | 125.20 | 156.50 | 187.80 | 2 | 93.90 | 156.50 |
| DR | 19 | 66.89 | 1.19 | NA | 19 | 46.15 | 8 | 61.48 | 67.67 | 72.53 | 101.22 | 5 | 11.05 | 55.08 |
Fig. 3a. Bar chart of U-238 distributions. b. Bar charts of Th-232 distributions. c. Bar chart of K-40 distributions. d. Bar chart of dose rates’ distributions.
Fig. 4Comparison plot of the activity concentrations of radionuclides and the dose rates.
Fig. 5Box plot showing the comparison among the analyzed parameters.
Correlation analyses of the radiometric data using Pearson correlations.
| Parameters | U-238 | Th-232 | K-40 | Dose rate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U-238 | Corr. | 1 | 0.23715 | −0.15618 | 0.84124 |
| Sig. | – | 0.32829 | 0.52315 | 6.39816E−6 | |
| Th-232 | Corr. | 0.23715 | 1 | 0.09765 | 0.69972 |
| Sig. | 0.32829 | – | 0.69085 | 8.53511E−4 | |
| K-40 | Corr. | −0.15618 | 0.09765 | 1 | 0.10123 |
| Sig. | 0.52315 | 0.69085 | – | 0.68007 | |
| Dose rate | Corr. | 0.84124 | 0.69972 | 0.10123 | 1 |
| Sig. | 6.39816E−6 | 8.53511E−4 | 0.68007 | – | |
2-tailed test of significance is used.
Correlation analyses of the radiometric data using Spearman correlations.
| Parameters | U-238 | Th-232 | K-40 | Dose rate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U-238 | Corr. | 1 | 0.20308 | −0.19806 | 0.65525 |
| Sig. | – | 0.40437 | 0.41633 | 0.00232 | |
| Th-232 | Corr. | 0.20308 | 1 | 0.06927 | 0.80509 |
| Sig. | 0.40437 | – | 0.77812 | 3.21051E−5 | |
| K-40 | Corr. | −0.19806 | 0.06927 | 1 | 0.13395 |
| Sig. | 0.41633 | 0.77812 | – | 0.58458 | |
| Dose rate | Corr. | 0.65525 | 0.80509 | 0.13395 | 1 |
| Sig. | 0.00232 | 3.21051E−5 | 0.58458 | – | |
2-tailed test of significance is used.
Correlation analyses of the radiometric data using Kendall correlations.
| Parameters | U-238 | Th-232 | K-40 | Dose Rate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U-238 | Corr. | 1 | 0.14243 | −0.1209 | 0.49559 |
| Sig. | – | 0.39967 | 0.49624 | 0.00324 | |
| Th-232 | Corr. | 0.14243 | 1 | 0.04441 | 0.64119 |
| Sig. | 0.39967 | – | 0.80217 | 1.34482E−4 | |
| K-40 | Corr. | −0.1209 | 0.04441 | 1 | 0.10722 |
| Sig. | 0.49624 | 0.80217 | – | 0.54333 | |
| Dose rate | Corr. | 0.49559 | 0.64119 | 0.10722 | 1 |
| Sig. | 0.00324 | 1.34482E−4 | 0.54333 | – | |
2-tailed test of significance is used.
Fig. 6Scatter matrix or Scatter plot.
Normality tests using Shapiro-Wilk, Lilliefors, and Kolmogorov-Smirnov techniques.
| Parameters | DF | Shapiro-Wilk | Lilliefors | Kolmogorov-Smirnov | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Statistic | Prob<W | Statistic | Prob>D | Statistic | Prob>D | ||
| U-238 | 19 | 0.82565 | 0.00276 | 0.19911 | 0.04590 | 0.19911 | 0.38966 |
| Th-232 | 19 | 0.91496 | 0.09135 | 0.16864 | 0.15299 | 0.16864 | 0.61001 |
| K-40 | 19 | 0.93452 | 0.20968 | 0.15707 | 0.20000 | 0.15707 | 0.70943 |
| Dose Rate | 19 | 0.90163 | 0.05208 | 0.20572 | 0.03346 | 0.20572 | 0.35017 |
At the 0.05, the data was not significantly drawn from a normally distributed population.
| Subject area | |
| More specific subject area | |
| Type of data | |
| How data was acquired | |
| Data format | |
| Experimental factors | |
| Experimental features | |
| Data source location | |
| Data accessibility |