| Literature DB >> 29899919 |
Alexander V Zabula1,2, Sarah N Spisak1, Alexander S Filatov1, Andrey Yu Rogachev3, Rodolphe Clérac4,5, Marina A Petrukhina1.
Abstract
The first structural characterization of the transient triply-reduced state of corannulene (C20H10) is accomplished. The X-ray crystallographic study reveals that the C20H10˙3- trianions, generated by corannulene reduction with metallic cesium, form a novel type of supramolecular sandwich-type assembly, [Cs+//(C20H103-)/4Cs+/(C20H103-)//Cs+]. In the product, two triply-charged corannulene decks encapsulate a rectangle of four cesium ions with the external concave bowl cavities being filled by one cesium ion each. The structural investigation is augmented by in-depth theoretical calculations to provide insights into the geometrical features and electronic structure of this unique organometallic self-assembly.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 29899919 PMCID: PMC5966907 DOI: 10.1039/c5sc04385a
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Sci ISSN: 2041-6520 Impact factor: 9.825
Scheme 1Preparation of 1.
Fig. 1Asymmetric unit (A), sandwich view (B) and depiction of the solvated Cs+ ions within the sandwich, superimposed with the space filling model (C) for 1.
Fig. 2Side and top views of [(C20H104–)/5Li+/(C20H104–)]3– (A) and [(C20H103–)/4Cs+/(C20H103–)]2– (B) based on their X-ray diffraction studies along with the optimized geometry of the Cs4-sandwich based on DFT calculations (C, exterior Cs ions are not shown).
Fig. 3Fragment of a 2D polymeric network in 1. Corannulene trianions and cesium cations are depicted using the space-filling model.
Key distances [in Å] of corannulene and its anions, C20H10
|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 (in | 4 |
| C20H100 | C20H10˙– | C20H102– | C20H10˙3– | C20H104– | |
| Hub | 1.411(2)–1.417(2) | 1.389(5)–1.425(5) | 1.390(3)–1.427(3) | 1.401(7)–1.429(7) | 1.391(5)–1.403(5) |
| Spoke | 1.376(2)–1.381(2) | 1.392(5)–1.417(5) | 1.400(3)–1.418(3) | 1.418(8)–1.443(7) | 1.424(5)–1.432(5) |
| Flank | 1.441(2)–1.450(2) | 1.388(5)–1.462(5) | 1.404(3)–1.475(3) | 1.421(7)–1.439(7) | 1.429(5)–1.443(5) |
| Rim | 1.377(2)–1.387(2) | 1.396(5)–1.453(6) | 1.375(3)–1.435(3) | 1.416(7)–1.438(8) | 1.453(5)–1.462(5) |
| Bowl depth | 0.875(2) | 0.841(5) | 0.811(3) | 0.850(7) | 0.283(5)/0.329(5) |
According to literature.32
For [Li+(DME)3][C20H10–].23
For [Li+(diglyme)2]2[C20H102–].23
For the naked [Li+5(C20H104–)2]3– sandwich.21
Fig. 4Molecular electrostatic potentials (MEPs) of the neutral C20H10 molecule (left) and discrete C20H10˙3– anion (right).
Fig. 5Spin density distribution (0.002 a.u. isosurface) for the discrete C20H10˙3– anion (top left), 1H-small model (top right), and 1-full and 1H-full models (bottom).
Fig. 6Molecular electrostatic potentials (MEPs) for the 1H-small (left), 1-small (center), and 14–-small (right) models.
Results of EDA analysis for 1-small, 1-full and 14–-small models ((PBE0/TZ2P/ZORA) in kcal mol–1)
| Parameters |
|
|
|
| DEint | –942.57 | –786.63 | –1536.03 |
| DEelstat | –853.45 | –760.52 | –1452.97 |
| DEorb | –241.89 | –200.84 | –341.41 |
| DEPauli | +152.77 | +174.73 | +258.35 |