| Literature DB >> 29899726 |
Serena Stanga1, Liliana Brambilla2, Bernadette Tasiaux1, Anh H Dang3, Adrian Ivanoiu4, Jean-Noël Octave1, Daniela Rossi2, Vincent van Pesch3,4, Pascal Kienlen-Campard1.
Abstract
The current inability of clinical criteria to accurately identify the "at-risk group" for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) development as well as its unknown etiology are fueling the interest in biomarkers aimed at completing clinical approaches for the diagnosis. The Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) is a diffusible peptide critically involved in neuronal differentiation and survival. GDNF is largely studied in various neurological and neuromuscular diseases, with a great interest in the peripheral nervous system (PNS). The recent discovery of Amyloid Precursor Protein (APP)-dependent GDNF regulation driving neuro-muscular junctions' formation in APP null transgenic mice, prompts to study whether neurodegeneration relies on loss or gain of APP function and suggests that it could affect peripheral processes. Here, we explored a brand-new aspect of the loss of trophic support in ALS by measuring GDNF, APP, soluble APP fragments and Aβ peptides levels in SOD1WT or SOD1G93A transgenic mouse models of ALS and in human biological fluids [i.e. serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)] from ALS patients and control subjects. Our results show that both GDNF and soluble APP fragments levels are altered at the onset of motor deficits in mice and that their levels are also modified in patient samples. This study indicates that both GDNF and soluble APPα represent possible biomarkers for ALS.Entities:
Keywords: amyloid precursor protein (APP); amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS); biomarker; glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF); neurodegeneration
Year: 2018 PMID: 29899726 PMCID: PMC5988896 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00384
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Demographic and clinical variables of the study group.
| Control 1 | 56–61 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Control 2 | 60–65 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Control 3 | 40–45 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Control 4 | 60–65 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Control 5 | 70–75 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Control 6 | 50–55 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Control 7 | 50–55 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| ALS 1 | 56–61 | Bulbar | 1 | 44 | 44 |
| ALS 2 | 36–41 | Bulbar + hemiparesis | 6 | 43 | 7.2 |
| ALS 3 | 66–71 | Paraparesis | 48 | 38 | 0.8 |
| ALS 4 | 60–65 | Bulbar + hemiparesis | 8 | 37 | 4.6 |
| ALS 5 | 70–75 | Paraparesis | 11 | 43 | 3.9 |
| ALS 6 | 70–75 | Bulbar | 12 | 42 | 3.5 |
| ALS 7 | 80–85 | Paraparesis | 8 | 45 | 5.6 |
L.O.I., Length of Illness; ALSFRS-R, ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised; NA, Not applicable. Both the ALSFRS-R and the Progression rate were calculated at the diagnosis. The references for the Progression Rate are: slow < 0.5, intermediate 0.5–1.0, fast >1.0.
Figure 1GDNF and APP levels in non-transgenic and SOD1 transgenic mice models. (A) GDNF mRNA levels were analyzed in hindlimbs muscles from non-transgenic (NTg), SOD1WT and SOD1G93A mice at ~100 (onset of motor deficits) and ~130 days of age (symptomatic stage). Values (mean ± SEM) are expressed as percentage of age-matched NTg mice. **P < 0.01, ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test, n = 3–4 mice per genotype and age. (B) APP levels were analyzed by Western blotting in the same muscles' lysates at 100 and 130 days, plus at 30 days (asymptomatic stage) in NTg, SOD1WT and SOD1G93A mice; GAPDH2 was used as a loading control probe. Quantifications are shown in (C). Values (mean ± SEM) are expressed as percentage of expression level of age-matched NTg mice. *P < 0.05 and #P < 0.05 vs. 100-day-old genotype-matched mice NTg and SOD1WT; ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test, n = 3–4 mice per genotype and age.
Figure 2GDNF levels in biological fluids from CTR subjects and ALS patients. GDNF levels were quantified by ELISA in the CSF (A) and serum (B) of controls without neurological disease and ALS patients. Values are given in picograms per milliliter (pg/ml). Each dot corresponds to one subject studied; the horizontal bar indicates the mean in each group. **P < 0. 001, Student's t-test (n = 7/group).
Figure 3CSF and serum sAPPα, β and their ratio in CTR and ALS patients. sAPP α levels (A,B) and sAPP β (C,D) were quantified by ECLIA in the CSF and serum of controls without neurological disease and ALS patients. sAPP α / sAPP β ratio have been showed for both CSF (E) and Serum (F). Values are given in nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml). Each dot corresponds to one subject studied; the horizontal bar indicates the mean in each group. *P < 0.05, Student's t-test (n = 7/group).
Figure 4CSF and serum Aβ38, Aβ40, and Aβ42 and Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio in CTR and ALS patients. Soluble monomeric Aβ38, Aβ40, and Aβ42 were quantified by ECLIA in the CSF (A) and serum (B) of controls without neurological disease and ALS patients. (C) Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio have been showed for both CSF and Serum. Values are given in nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml). Each dot corresponds to one subject studied (n = 7/group); the horizontal bar indicates the mean in each group.