| Literature DB >> 29898786 |
Shunpei Andoh1, Chie Matsuura2, Yuuki Sakaeyama2, Shinichi Okonogi2, Yasuhiro Node2, Hiroyuki Masuda2, Kousuke Kondo2, Naoyuki Harada2, Masaaki Nemoto2, Nobuo Sugo2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The incidence of acute epidural hematoma not accompanied by fracture is low, and it mostly occurs right below the impact point in children. Acute epidural hematoma on the contralateral side of the impact point without fracture is very rare. CASEEntities:
Keywords: Acute epidural hematoma; Bone fracture; Contrecoup injury
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29898786 PMCID: PMC6001146 DOI: 10.1186/s13256-018-1676-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Case Rep ISSN: 1752-1947
Fig. 1Head computed tomography (case 1). Computed tomography at 150 min after the injury showed acute epidural hematoma in the right frontal region (a-c) and no evidence of bone fracture (d-h)
Fig. 2Acute epidural hematoma without bone fracture (case 1). The site of bleeding was traced to the right middle meningeal artery
Fig. 3Head computed tomography (case 2) on admission. Computed tomography showed acute epidural hematoma in the right occipital, right suboccipital, and left frontal region (a-c). There was a separated skull fracture on the lambdoid suture (d-h)
Fig. 4Head computed tomography after surgery. Computed tomography showed enlargement of the left frontal acute epidural hematoma
Fig. 5Intraoperative photograph. a Acute epidural hematoma without bone fracture (case 2). b The site of bleeding was traced to the left middle meningeal artery
Summary of acute epidural hematoma caused by contrecoup injury without bone fracture
| Case | Author (year) | Age | Sex | impact point | fracture of impact side | coup injury | operation for coup injury | site of contrecoup EDH | operation for contrecoup EDH | injury vessels | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ikeda et al. (1980) [ | 5 | F | Rt T | ― | ― | ― | Lt SO, bil O | + | confluens sinuum | GR |
| 2 | Takada et al. (2010) [ | 9 | M | Rt O | ― | ― | ― | Lt F | ― | unknown | GR |
| 3 | Okita et al. (1988) [ | 18 | F | Rt O | + | EDH | ― | Lt F | + | unknown | GR |
| 4 | Hirai et al. (2004) [ | 20 | F | Rt T | + | EDH | + | Lt T | + | nc | GR |
| 5 | Balasubramaniam and Ramesh (1991) [ | 21 | M | Rt P | + | EDH | + | Lt F | + | small dural vessels | GR |
| 6 | Ikeda et al. (1980) [ | 28 | M | Rt F | nc | ― | ― | Lt SO, Lt O | + | nc | GR |
| 7 | Bucci et al. (1986) [ | 34 | F | Lt F | ― | ― | ― | Lt O | + | nc | dead |
| 8 | Abe et al. (1988) [ | 36 | M | Rt F | + | ― | ― | bil SO, Lt O | + | Lt TS | dead |
| 9 | Yanagawa et al. (1998) [ | 39 | F | Rt facial | + | ― | ― | Lt SO, Lt O | + | Lt TS | GR |
| 10 | Shigemori et al. (1985) [ | 43 | M | Rt FT | + | ― | ― | Rt SO, Rt O | + | Rt TS | GR |
| 11 | Mishra and Mohanty (2001) [ | 50 | M | Lt FP | + | contusion | ― | Rt FP | + | nc | GR |
| 12 | Mitsuyama et al. (2004) [ | 50 | F | Lt P | + | EDH | + | Rt F | ― | unknown | GR |
| 13 | Okamoto et al. (1983) [ | 51 | F | O | ― | ― | ― | Lt F | + | unknown | GR |
| 14 | Miyazaki et al. (1995) [ | 52 | F | Lt O | + | EDH | ― | Rt F | + | small dural vessels | GR |
| 15 | Okinaga et al. (2002) [ | 55 | F | Rt O | + | EDH | + | bil F | + | SSS | GR |
| 16 | Nakagawa et al. (1990) [ | 57 | F | Lt T | + | EDH | + | Rt T | + | unknown | GR |
| 17 | Hamasaki et al. (1987) [ | 58 | F | Rt O | + | contusion | + | Rt F | ― | unknown | dead |
| 18 | Motohashi et al. (2000) [ | 59 | F | O | + | ― | ― | Lt F | ― | unknown | GR |
| 19 | Sato et al. (2009) [ | 68 | F | Rt O | + | EDH | ― | Lt F | ― | unknown | GR |
| 20 | Our case | 52 | F | Lt O | ― | ― | ― | Rt F | + | MMA | GR |
| 21 | 56 | M | Rt O | + | EDH | + | Lt F | + | MMA | GR |
bil bilateral, F frontal, FT frontotemporal, FP frontoparietal, GR good recovery, MMA middle meningeal artery, nc no contribution, O occipital, SO suboccipital, SSS superficial saggital sinus, T temporal, TS transverse sinus