| Literature DB >> 29898699 |
Buyun Wu1, Jing Wang1, Guang Yang1, Changying Xing1, Huijuan Mao2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Renal replacement therapy (RRT) with regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) is an important therapeutic approach for refractory hypercalcemia complicated with renal failure. However, RCA has the potential to induce arrhythmia caused by rapid calcium loss. We report a case of arrhythmia associated with rapid calcium loss during RCA-RRT. CASEEntities:
Keywords: Arrhythmia; Hypercalcemia; Hypocalcemia; Regional citrate anticoagulation; Threshold value
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29898699 PMCID: PMC6000971 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-018-0936-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nephrol ISSN: 1471-2369 Impact factor: 2.388
Fig. 1The QTc interval was prolonged during the second RCA-hemofiltration session, as compared to the first procedure. a Baseline ECG collected 3 days before. b ECG at the second RCA-hemofiltration session. The mean QT interval increased from 346 to 369 ms and the mean QTc interval increased from 423 to 494 ms
Fig. 2Changes in serum ionized calcium and calcium substitution rates during RCA-hemofiltration. a Changes in serum ionized calcium during hospitalization. b-d Changes in serum ionized calcium and calcium substitution rates during RCA-hemofiltration
The QT and QTc intervals of two electrocardiograms (ECGs) of the patient
| Parameters | ECG | I | II | III | aVR | aVL | aVF | V1 | V2 | V3 | V4 | V5 | V6 | Mean | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QT intervals (ms) | a | 348 | 339 | 346 | 342 | 342 | 335 | 335 | 356 | 356 | 351 | 353 | 346 | 346 | 21 |
| b | 374 | 366 | 366 | 382 | 368 | 351 | 364 | 373 | 370 | 373 | 368 | 368 | 369 | 26 | |
| QTc interval (ms) | a | 426 | 415 | 423 | 419 | 419 | 410 | 410 | 436 | 436 | 430 | 432 | 419 | 423 | 31 |
| b | 502 | 491 | 491 | 512 | 493 | 471 | 488 | 500 | 496 | 500 | 493 | 493 | 494 | 41 |
Recent studies of hypercalcemia treatment by prolonged intermittent or continuous RRT
| Author, year | No. | Citrate dosea (mmol/L) | Calcium doseb (mmol/h) | Mode, blood flow (mL/min) | Dose (L/h) | Ionized Calcium (mmol/L) | Calcium lossc (mmol/h) | Adverse effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low-calcium HD | Suppose ionized calcium reduced from 1.9 to 1.3 mmol/L after the dialyzer, blood flow was 150 mL/min and dialysate flow was 500 mL/min | 1.90 | 5.40 | No | ||||
| Calcium-free HD [ | Suppose ionized calcium reduced from 1.9 to 0.5 mmol/L after the dialyzer, blood flow was 150 mL/min and dialysate flow was 500 mL/min | 1.90 | 12.6 | Frequent | ||||
| V.sramek 1998 [ | 1 | 3.7–6.1 | 0 | CVVHDF, 100 | 3 | 2.0d | 6.30 | No |
| Mlles 2008 [ | 1 | 4.3 | 1.2 | CVVHD, 200 | 2.2 | 1.77 | 2.91 | No |
| Au 2012 [ | 1 | – | 0 | CVVH, 150 | 2 | 2.19 | 4.38 | No |
| Matis 2015 [ | 4 | 3 | 1.5–2.3 | CVVHDF, 180 | 3.7 | 1.72 | 5.23 | No |
| 3 | 1.3 | CVVHDF, 100 | 2.5 | 1.90 | 3.70 | Hypocalcemia | ||
| 3–3.5 | 2–2.75 | CVVHDF, 100 | 2.5 | 1.79 | 2.48 | No | ||
| 3 | 1.5 | CVVHDF, 100 | 2.5 | 1.80 | 3.00 | Hypocalcemia | ||
| 3 | 1.4 | CVVHDF, 100 | 2.5 | 2.09 | 3.82 | No | ||
| The present study | 1 | |||||||
| Second session | 4.2 | 1.1(at start) | HF, 120 | 4.3 | 1.91 | 7.54 | Arrhythmia | |
| Third session | 4.2 | 2.2 | HF, 120 | 4.3 | 1.91 | 6.44 | No | |
Note: acitrate (mmol/L) = infusion of citrate/blood flow; bcalcium dose (mmol/h) = infusion of calcium substitution; cestimated calcium loss (mmol/h) = (ionized calcium + complex calcium) multiply by effluent – calcium dose, and suppose complex calcium = 0.1 mmol/L; dsupposed ionized calcium = 2.0 mmol/L