Literature DB >> 29898473

The Effect of Remnant Tissue Preservation in Anatomic Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction on Knee Stability and Graft Maturation.

Tsuneari Takahashi1,2, Masashi Kimura1, Keiichi Hagiwara1, Takashi Ohsawa3, Katsushi Takeshita2.   

Abstract

Several investigators have developed anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (ACLR) with remnant tissue preservation (RTP) and have reported better clinical outcomes. However, the effects of RTP remain controversial. To date, no reports have compared both clinical and radiological outcomes of anatomic double-bundle ACLR using the hamstring tendon and outside-in technique with/without RTP. This article evaluates the effectiveness of RTP in ACLR on knee stability and graft maturation. In total, 75 patients with unilateral ACL injury who had undergone anatomic double-bundle ACLR using autografted hamstring tendon either with RTP (Group P, n = 43) or without (Group N, n = 32) were enrolled. Clinical scores, pre- and postoperative side-to-side differences (SSDs) obtained using Telos, radiological evaluations of the grafted tendon using the signal/noise quotient (SNQ) measured using magnetic resonance imaging, and arthroscopic evaluations of the grafted tendon were retrospectively compared between the groups. Postoperative SSDs were smaller in the Group P (0.78 ± 1.90 mm) than in the Group N (1.29 ± 2.18 mm); however, this difference was not significant. Comparing two subgroups of the Group P, the SSD was significantly smaller in those with sufficient remnant coverage (-0.56 ± 1.38 mm) than in those without (1.48 ± 1.77 mm) (p = 0.019), as well as in the Group N patients (p = 0.019). The degree of synovial coverage of the anteromedial (p = 0.0064) and posterolateral (p = 0.032) bundle grafted tendon at the time of second-look arthroscopy was significantly better in the Group P than in the Group N. SNQ values of ACL grafted tendon at proximal (p = 0.049), middle, and distal (p = 0.039) one-third in Group P were better than those in Group N. RTP may enhance synovial coverage and maturation of the grafted tendon. Sufficient remnant tissue coverage may contribute to better knee stability. This is a Level III, retrospective comparative study. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29898473     DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1660513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Knee Surg        ISSN: 1538-8506            Impact factor:   2.757


  5 in total

1.  Effect of a new remnant-preserving technique with anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on MRI-based graft maturity: a comparison cohort study.

Authors:  Hiroki Shimodaira; Keiji Tensho; Suguru Koyama; Tomoya Iwaasa; Daiki Kumaki; Kazushige Yoshida; Hiroshi Horiuchi; Jun Takahashi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 4.114

2.  Compartment syndrome after transtibial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A case report.

Authors:  Tsuneari Takahashi; Mikiko Handa; Katsushi Takeshita
Journal:  Trauma Case Rep       Date:  2022-01-03

3.  Remnant Tissue Preserved Transtibial Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Femoral Tunnel Created Behind the Resident's Ridge.

Authors:  Tsuneari Takahashi; Katsushi Takeshita
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2021-10-16

4.  Knee Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction With Knotless Soft Anchor: Shallow Fixation Prevents Tunnel Convergence.

Authors:  Timothée Mesnier; Marie Cavaignac; Vincent Marot; Nicolas Reina; Etienne Cavaignac
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2022-03-16

Review 5.  Effects of remnant preservation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Huanyu Xie; Zicai Fu; Mingjin Zhong; Zhenhan Deng; Chen Wang; Yijia Sun; Weimin Zhu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-09-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.