Literature DB >> 29898041

Not Everything that Shines is Calcium.

Ilan Gottlieb1,2, Fernanda Erthal1,2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29898041      PMCID: PMC5967135          DOI: 10.5935/abc.20180084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol        ISSN: 0066-782X            Impact factor:   2.000


× No keyword cloud information.
Coronary calcification is involved in the pathophysiological process of atherosclerosis, particularly at later stages of the disease, as part of its healing process.[1] In fact, calcification is not required for plaque development or progression, or luminal obstruction, or even for the development of cardiovascular events - these processes, in addition to plaque instability is commonly seen.[2] Our group showed, in a randomized clinical trial on symptomatic patients, that 20% of vessels with complete obstructions in invasive angiography had no calcification according to calcium scoree,[3] corroborating histopathological studies that demonstrated the absence of calcification in a considerable number of the coronary plaques evaluated.[4] Understanding or the pathophysiology of coronary disease is essential to contextualize calcium score in population studies. These studies, however, have shown some controversial results on the rates of cardiovascular events and obstructive lesions. The reason for this apparent divergence of results is the study population. Asymptomatic patients with zero calcium score are different from symptomatic ones without calcification, who in turn, are different from patients with history of early coronary disease, diabetics or smokers with zero calcium score. We may cite the contrasting example of two hypothetical populations - one of young adults (30-35 years old), with symptoms of precordial pain, and another one composed of elderly smokers (70-75 years old), with no cardiovascular symptom. It will be no surprise to find an overwhelmingly higher frequency of significant coronary obstruction in the group of asymptomatic elderly subjects with zero calcium score than in the first group with some coronary calcification. Also, it will be no wonder to find a higher rate of cardiovascular events in the group of 70-75-year-old subjects than in the group of 30-35-year old subjects. Such paradox is obviously grounded in the difference of the study populations - the prevalence of atherosclerosis is so much higher in the elderly than in the young group that even comparisons between subgroups with and without calcification and with and without symptoms will always reveal a higher prevalence of cardiovascular diseases and events in the group of elderly smokers than in the other one. The attempt of using the zero calcium score as a gatekeeper for coronary computed tomography angiography (or other tests) in symptomatic patients should be considered with caution, be it in an emergency room or in an outpatient clinic. Subtle differences in population profiles, including ethnical differences, may result in considerable differences in the diagnostic and prognostic performance of a zero calcium score.[5],[6] Since calcification is only an indirect marker of coronary obstruction, differing from a direct visualization of the obstructive plaque by coronary computed tomography angiography, characteristics of the population studied become critical. An analogy can be made between the low prevalence of obstructive coronary disease in patients with zero calcium score and young women; both are mere population filters. No one would today underestimate symptoms in young women only because of a low pre-test probability. In the current issue of the ABC, Gabriel et al.[7] elegantly show a high prevalence of coronary disease, detected by computed tomography coronary angiography, in patients with zero calcium score. Interestingly, alcohol consumption and obesity, but not age showed an association with the presence of plaques in the absence of calcification. This has important implications on the development of prevention strategies for cardiovascular diseases. Finally, the use of calcium score for detection of coronary calcification is an important tool for stratification of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic individuals, especially because the score is an easy and low-cost instrument. However, in the context of atherosclerosis, disease status goes beyond calcification and, definitely, not everything that shines is calcium.
  6 in total

Review 1.  Concept of vulnerable/unstable plaque.

Authors:  Aloke V Finn; Masataka Nakano; Jagat Narula; Frank D Kolodgie; Renu Virmani
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 8.311

2.  The absence of coronary calcification does not exclude obstructive coronary artery disease or the need for revascularization in patients referred for conventional coronary angiography.

Authors:  Ilan Gottlieb; Julie M Miller; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Marc Dewey; Melvin E Clouse; Leonardo Sara; Hiroyuki Niinuma; David E Bush; Narinder Paul; Andrea L Vavere; John Texter; Jeffery Brinker; João A C Lima; Carlos E Rochitte
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Distribution of coronary artery calcium by race, gender, and age: results from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).

Authors:  Robyn L McClelland; Hyoju Chung; Robert Detrano; Wendy Post; Richard A Kronmal
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  CT coronary calcification: What does a score of "0" mean?

Authors:  Ilan Gottlieb; Leonardo Sara; Jeff A Brinker; João A C Lima; Carlos Eduardo Rochitte
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association.

Authors:  H C Stary; A B Chandler; R E Dinsmore; V Fuster; S Glagov; W Insull; M E Rosenfeld; C J Schwartz; W D Wagner; R W Wissler
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-09-01       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Histopathologic characteristics of atherosclerotic coronary disease and implications of the findings for the invasive and noninvasive detection of vulnerable plaques.

Authors:  Jagat Narula; Masataka Nakano; Renu Virmani; Frank D Kolodgie; Rita Petersen; Robert Newcomb; Shaista Malik; Valentin Fuster; Aloke V Finn
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 24.094

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.