Marcin Zadworny1, Louise H Comas2, David M Eissenstat3,4. 1. Institute of Dendrology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Parkowa, Kórnik, Poland. 2. USDA-ARS Water Management Research Unit, Fort Collins, CO, USA. 3. Intercollege Graduate Degree Program in Plant Biology, Penn State University, University Park, PA, USA. 4. Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, Penn State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Understanding root traits and their trade-off with other plant processes is important for understanding plant functioning in natural ecosystems as well as agricultural systems. The aim of the present study was to determine the relationship between root morphology and the hydraulic characteristics of several orders of fine roots (<2 mm) for species differing in shade tolerance (low, moderate and high). Methods: The morphological, anatomical and hydraulic traits across five distal root orders were measured in species with different levels of shade tolerance and life history strategies. The species studied were Acer negundo, Acer rubrum, Acer saccharum, Betula alleghaniensis, Betula lenta, Quercus alba, Quercus rubra, Pinus strobus and Pinus virginiana. Key Results: Compared with shade-tolerant species, shade-intolerant species produced thinner absorptive roots with smaller xylem lumen diameters and underwent secondary development less frequently, suggesting that they had shorter life spans. Shade-tolerant species had greater root specific hydraulic conductance among these roots due to having larger diameter xylems, although these roots had a lower calculated critical tension for conduit collapse. In addition, shade-intolerant species exhibited greater variation in hydraulic conductance across different root growth rings in woody transport roots of the same root order as compared with shade-tolerant species. Conclusions: Plant growth strategies were extended to include root hydraulic properties. It was found that shade intolerance in trees was associated with conservative root hydraulics but greater plasticity in number of xylem conduits and hydraulic conductance. Root traits of shade-intolerant species were consistent with the ability to proliferate roots quickly for rapid water uptake needed to support rapid shoot growth, while minimizing risk in uncertain environments.
Background and Aims: Understanding root traits and their trade-off with other plant processes is important for understanding plant functioning in natural ecosystems as well as agricultural systems. The aim of the present study was to determine the relationship between root morphology and the hydraulic characteristics of several orders of fine roots (<2 mm) for species differing in shade tolerance (low, moderate and high). Methods: The morphological, anatomical and hydraulic traits across five distal root orders were measured in species with different levels of shade tolerance and life history strategies. The species studied were Acer negundo, Acer rubrum, Acer saccharum, Betula alleghaniensis, Betula lenta, Quercus alba, Quercus rubra, Pinus strobus and Pinus virginiana. Key Results: Compared with shade-tolerant species, shade-intolerant species produced thinner absorptive roots with smaller xylem lumen diameters and underwent secondary development less frequently, suggesting that they had shorter life spans. Shade-tolerant species had greater root specific hydraulic conductance among these roots due to having larger diameter xylems, although these roots had a lower calculated critical tension for conduit collapse. In addition, shade-intolerant species exhibited greater variation in hydraulic conductance across different root growth rings in woody transport roots of the same root order as compared with shade-tolerant species. Conclusions: Plant growth strategies were extended to include root hydraulic properties. It was found that shade intolerance in trees was associated with conservative root hydraulics but greater plasticity in number of xylem conduits and hydraulic conductance. Root traits of shade-intolerant species were consistent with the ability to proliferate roots quickly for rapid water uptake needed to support rapid shoot growth, while minimizing risk in uncertain environments.
Authors: M Luke McCormack; Ian A Dickie; David M Eissenstat; Timothy J Fahey; Christopher W Fernandez; Dali Guo; Heljä-Sisko Helmisaari; Erik A Hobbie; Colleen M Iversen; Robert B Jackson; Jaana Leppälammi-Kujansuu; Richard J Norby; Richard P Phillips; Kurt S Pregitzer; Seth G Pritchard; Boris Rewald; Marcin Zadworny Journal: New Phytol Date: 2015-03-10 Impact factor: 10.151
Authors: Agnieszka Bagniewska-Zadworna; Julia Byczyk; David M Eissenstat; Jacek Oleksyn; Marcin Zadworny Journal: Am J Bot Date: 2012-08-23 Impact factor: 3.844
Authors: Weile Chen; Roger T Koide; Thomas S Adams; Jared L DeForest; Lei Cheng; David M Eissenstat Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-07-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Gregory A Gambetta; Jiong Fei; Thomas L Rost; Thorsten Knipfer; Mark A Matthews; Ken A Shackel; M Andrew Walker; Andrew J McElrone Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2013-09-18 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: Grégoire T Freschet; Loïc Pagès; Colleen M Iversen; Louise H Comas; Boris Rewald; Catherine Roumet; Jitka Klimešová; Marcin Zadworny; Hendrik Poorter; Johannes A Postma; Thomas S Adams; Agnieszka Bagniewska-Zadworna; A Glyn Bengough; Elison B Blancaflor; Ivano Brunner; Johannes H C Cornelissen; Eric Garnier; Arthur Gessler; Sarah E Hobbie; Ina C Meier; Liesje Mommer; Catherine Picon-Cochard; Laura Rose; Peter Ryser; Michael Scherer-Lorenzen; Nadejda A Soudzilovskaia; Alexia Stokes; Tao Sun; Oscar J Valverde-Barrantes; Monique Weemstra; Alexandra Weigelt; Nina Wurzburger; Larry M York; Sarah A Batterman; Moemy Gomes de Moraes; Štěpán Janeček; Hans Lambers; Verity Salmon; Nishanth Tharayil; M Luke McCormack Journal: New Phytol Date: 2021-11 Impact factor: 10.323