Segun I Popoola1, Aderemi A Atayero1, Joke A Badejo1, Jonathan A Odukoya2, David O Omole3, Priscilla Ajayi4. 1. Department of Electrical and Information Engineering, Covenant University, Ota, Nigeria. 2. Department of Psychology, Covenant University, Ota, Nigeria. 3. Department of Civil Engineering, Covenant University, Ota, Nigeria. 4. Center for Systems and Information Services, Covenant University, Ota, Nigeria.
Abstract
In this data article, we present and analyze the demographic data of undergraduates admitted into engineering programs at Covenant University, Nigeria. The population distribution of 2649 candidates admitted into Chemical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Computer Engineering, Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Information and Communication Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, and Petroleum Engineering programs between 2002 and 2009 are analyzed by gender, age, and state of origin. The data provided in this data article were retrieved from the student bio-data submitted to the Department of Admissions and Student Records (DASR) and Center for Systems and Information Services (CSIS) by the candidates during the application process into the various engineering undergraduate programs. These vital information is made publicly available, after proper data anonymization, to facilitate empirical research in the emerging field of demographics analytics in higher education. A Microsoft Excel spreadsheet file is attached to this data article and the data is thoroughly described for easy reuse. Descriptive statistics and frequency distributions of the demographic data are presented in tables, plots, graphs, and charts. Unrestricted access to these demographic data will facilitate reliable and evidence-based research findings for sustainable education in developing countries.
In this data article, we present and analyze the demographic data of undergraduates admitted into engineering programs at Covenant University, Nigeria. The population distribution of 2649 candidates admitted into Chemical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Computer Engineering, Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Information and Communication Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, and Petroleum Engineering programs between 2002 and 2009 are analyzed by gender, age, and state of origin. The data provided in this data article were retrieved from the student bio-data submitted to the Department of Admissions and Student Records (DASR) and Center for Systems and Information Services (CSIS) by the candidates during the application process into the various engineering undergraduate programs. These vital information is made publicly available, after proper data anonymization, to facilitate empirical research in the emerging field of demographics analytics in higher education. A Microsoft Excel spreadsheet file is attached to this data article and the data is thoroughly described for easy reuse. Descriptive statistics and frequency distributions of the demographic data are presented in tables, plots, graphs, and charts. Unrestricted access to these demographic data will facilitate reliable and evidence-based research findings for sustainable education in developing countries.
Specifications TableValue of the dataDemographic data provided in this article will encourage empirical research and the adoption of data analytics in understanding the trends in enrollment of undergraduates in higher education, especially in developing countries [1], [2], [3], [4], [5].Unrestricted access to these demographic data will give executives, management, and policy makers in higher education useful insights for better decision-making [6], [7].Further exploration of these data by the global educational research community will facilitate gender equality in higher education and encourage women participation in the field of engineering. Also, underserved population can be identified and possible solutions may be recommended to relevant authorities [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13].Descriptive statistics and frequency distributions that are presented in tables and charts will make data interpretation much easier for scientific conclusions [14], [15], [16], [17].Data shared in this data article will open up doors for new research collaborations.
Data
The fourth goal (Goal 4) of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) set by the general assembly of the United Nations in September 2015 focus on “ensuring inclusive and equitable quality education, and promoting lifelong learning opportunities for all” [18], [19], [20]. It is expected that both women and men should have equal access to “affordable and quality technical, vocational, tertiary education” by 2030. This, in essence, will encourage gender equality in higher education, most especially for men-dominated programs of study.Table 1 presents the gender distribution of undergraduates admitted into the seven engineering programs (Chemical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Computer Engineering, Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Information and Communication Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, and Petroleum Engineering) over the period of eight years (2002–2009). In each year, the engineering programs are significantly male-dominated. Fig. 1 shows a good graphical visualization of the gender distribution of undergraduates admitted into the seven engineering programs in the eight-year period. The proportions of female to male undergraduates in the engineering programs are illustrated in Fig. 2(a)–(b).
Table 1
Gender distribution of undergraduates admitted into engineering programs.
Year of admission
No. of female students
No. of male students
Total no. of students
2002
53
128
181
2003
68
177
245
2004
90
236
326
2005
103
293
396
2006
102
288
390
2007
105
289
394
2008
91
284
375
2009
100
242
342
Total
712
1937
2649
Fig. 1
Bar chart showing the gender distribution of undergraduates admitted into engineering programs.
Fig. 2
(a)–(b). Proportions of female and male undergraduates admitted (2002–2009).
Bar chart showing the gender distribution of undergraduates admitted into engineering programs.(a)–(b). Proportions of female and male undergraduates admitted (2002–2009).Gender distribution of undergraduates admitted into engineering programs.In addition, age distribution of the undergraduates admitted into the engineering programs at Covenant University are presented and analyzed. The ages of the students are grouped into four categories: 14–17 years old; 18–21 years old; 22–25 years old; and 26 years old and above. The population distribution of the undergraduates by age is presented in Table 2. The bar chart in Fig. 3 shows the graphical visualization of the age distribution. The proportions of undergraduates each of the age groups are shown in Fig. 4(a)–(b).
Table 2
Age distribution of undergraduates admitted into engineering programs.
Year of admission
Entry age in years
14–17
18–21
22–25
26 and above
2002
25
128
20
8
2003
47
191
7
0
2004
74
232
19
1
2005
124
262
10
0
2006
133
257
0
0
2007
149
237
8
0
2008
170
200
5
0
2009
190
151
1
0
Total
912
1658
70
9
Fig. 3
Bar chart showing the age distribution of undergraduates admitted into engineering programs.
Fig. 4
(a)–(b). Proportions of undergraduates admitted by age (2002–2009).
Bar chart showing the age distribution of undergraduates admitted into engineering programs.(a)–(b). Proportions of undergraduates admitted by age (2002–2009).Age distribution of undergraduates admitted into engineering programs.
Experimental design, materials and methods
For the eight-year admission period covered in this study, the demographic data (gender, age, and state of origin) of undergraduate admitted into the seven engineering programs available at Covenant University, Nigeria were retrieved from the student bio-data submitted to the Department of Admissions and Student Records (DASR) and Center for Systems and Information Services (CSIS). The population distribution of 2649 candidates admitted into Chemical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Computer Engineering, Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Information and Communication Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, and Petroleum Engineering programs between 2002 and 2009 are analyzed by gender, age, and state of origin. Descriptive statistics and frequency distributions that are presented in tables and graphs will make data interpretation much easier for scientific conclusions.The population sample of the undergraduates admitted into the engineering programs are analyzed by state of origin and the results are presented in Table 3. All of the states of the Federation and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) are represented except Jigawa, Katsina, Kebbi, Sokoto, Yobe, and Zamfara states. Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 7, Fig. 8, Fig. 9, Fig. 10, Fig. 11, Fig. 12 illustrate the frequency distributions of the undergraduates in engineering programs by state of origin from 2002 to 2009 respectively.
Table 3
Distribution of undergraduates admitted into engineering programs by state of origin.
State ID
State of origin
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Total
%
1
Abia
2
8
7
10
11
18
25
17
98
3.69
2
Adamawa
0
0
2
1
1
1
1
2
8
0.30
3
Akwa-Ibom
1
4
13
13
16
9
18
18
92
3.47
4
Anambra
0
16
12
26
19
32
35
24
164
6.18
5
Bauchi
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0.04
6
Bayelsa
0
1
3
5
4
1
3
3
20
0.75
7
Benue
1
1
2
1
1
1
5
1
13
0.49
8
Borno
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7
0.26
9
Cross River
1
2
1
4
4
3
5
6
26
0.98
10
Delta
12
26
26
38
42
45
33
36
258
9.72
11
Ebonyi
0
0
2
2
2
2
4
0
12
0.45
12
Edo
13
14
28
26
30
29
27
26
193
7.27
13
Ekiti
15
17
23
25
28
21
19
21
169
6.37
14
Enugu
0
3
5
2
3
2
2
2
19
0.72
15
FCT
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0.04
16
Gombe
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0.04
17
Imo
3
7
13
12
18
16
19
14
102
3.84
18
Kaduna
0
0
1
1
1
1
3
4
11
0.41
19
Kano
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0.04
20
Kogi
14
6
9
13
13
13
14
10
92
3.47
21
Kwara
7
4
14
12
9
10
11
18
85
3.20
22
Lagos
16
20
17
31
17
18
13
15
147
5.54
23
Nasarawa
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
4
0.15
24
Niger
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
3
0.11
25
Ogun
39
43
53
74
70
59
51
45
434
16.36
26
Ondo
19
25
28
30
28
32
23
29
214
8.07
27
Osun
20
23
21
45
36
48
32
24
249
9.39
28
Oyo
12
23
32
22
27
24
24
19
183
6.90
29
Plateau
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
4
0.15
30
Rivers
3
1
9
1
7
7
5
5
38
1.43
31
Taraba
1
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
4
0.15
Fig. 5
Frequency distribution by state of origin for year 2002.
Fig. 6
Frequency distribution by state of origin for year 2003.
Fig. 7
Frequency distribution by state of origin for year 2004.
Fig. 8
Frequency distribution by state of origin for year 2005.
Fig. 9
Frequency distribution by state of origin for year 2006.
Fig. 10
Frequency distribution by state of origin for year 2007.
Fig. 11
Frequency distribution by state of origin for year 2008.
Fig. 12
Frequency distribution by state of origin for year 2009.
Frequency distribution by state of origin for year 2002.Frequency distribution by state of origin for year 2003.Frequency distribution by state of origin for year 2004.Frequency distribution by state of origin for year 2005.Frequency distribution by state of origin for year 2006.Frequency distribution by state of origin for year 2007.Frequency distribution by state of origin for year 2008.Frequency distribution by state of origin for year 2009.Distribution of undergraduates admitted into engineering programs by state of origin.Economic, political, and educational resources are often shared across six geopolitical zones in Nigeria. The states of the federation are grouped into the six geopolitical zones as presented in Table 4. The analysis of the contributions of each zone to the total number of engineering undergraduates are also available in Table 4. Fig. 13 shows the percentage contribution of each zone to the total number of undergraduates admitted into engineering programs at Covenant University, Nigeria.
Table 4
Distribution of undergraduates in engineering programs across the six geopolitical zones.
Geopolitical zones
States of the federation
Total no. of undergraduates in engineering programs
Total no. of undergraduates in geopolitical zone
North Central
Benue
13
202
Kogi
92
Kwara
85
Nasarawa
4
Niger
3
Plateau
4
FCT
1
North East
Adamawa
8
21
Bauchi
1
Borno
7
Gombe
1
Taraba
4
Yobe
0
North West
Jigawa
0
12
Kaduna
11
Kano
1
Katsina
0
Kebbi
0
Sokoto
0
Zamfara
0
South East
Abia
98
395
Anambra
164
Ebonyi
12
Enugu
19
Imo
102
South South
Akwa-Ibom
92
627
Cross River
26
Bayelsa
20
Rivers
38
Delta
258
Edo
193
South West
Ekiti
169
1396
Lagos
147
Ogun
434
Ondo
214
Osun
249
Oyo
183
Fig. 13
Percentage of undergraduates in engineering programs by geopolitical zones.
Percentage of undergraduates in engineering programs by geopolitical zones.Distribution of undergraduates in engineering programs across the six geopolitical zones.
Conclusion
This data article presented and analyzed the demographic trends in enrollment into undergraduate engineering programs at Covenant University, Nigeria. Demographic data provided in this article will encourage empirical research and the adoption of data analytics in understanding the trends in enrollment of undergraduates in higher education, especially in developing countries. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed based on gender, age, and state of origin of the population sample. Evidence-based insights gained from these data will inform proper formulation of admission policies that govern entry into engineering programs in the sub-Saharan African region. The contribution of these data is considered to be significant in the sense that it revealed the need to advocate for the recruitment and retention of women in technical disciplines in developing countries. Free accessibility to these demographic data will give executives, management, and policy makers in higher education useful insights for better decision-making.
Subject area
Engineering Education
More specific subject area
Demographic Analytics
Type of data
Tables, charts, and spreadsheet file
How data was acquired
The demographic data were retrieved from the information submitted to the Department of Admissions and Student Records (DASR) and Center for Systems and Information Services (CSIS) by the candidates during the application process into the various engineering undergraduate programs.
Data format
Raw, analyzed
Experimental factors
Applicants with incomplete academic records were excluded
Experimental features
Descriptive statistics and frequency distributions of the demographic data are analyzed and presented in tables and charts.
In order to encourage evidence-based research in admission analytics, detailed datasets are made publicly available in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet file attached to this article.
Authors: Chris Gillette; Michael Rudolph; Nicole Rockich-Winston; Eric R Blough; James A Sizemore; Jinsong Hao; Chris Booth; Kimberly Broedel-Zaugg; Megan Peterson; Stephanie Anderson; Brittany Riley; Brian C Train; Robert B Stanton; H Glenn Anderson Journal: Curr Pharm Teach Learn Date: 2016-10-27