| Literature DB >> 29896079 |
Sung H Jang1, Seong H Kim2, Young H Kwon1.
Abstract
Objectives: This study investigated injuries of the ascending reticular activating system (ARAS) following whiplash injury, in patients with excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS).Entities:
Keywords: ascending reticular activating system; diffusion tensor tractography; excessive daytime sleepiness; hypersomnia; whiplash injury
Year: 2018 PMID: 29896079 PMCID: PMC5987027 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00348
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 4.677
Demographic and clinical data of the patient and control groups.
| Sex (male: female) | 3:6 | 5:9 | 8:15 | 12:14 |
| Mean age, years | 47.2 (±12.4) | 43.1 (±9.3) | 44.7 (±10.6) | 41.5 (±9.6) |
| ESS | 7.1 (±2.2) | 15.3 (±4.3) | 12.1 (±5.4) | – |
| LOC, minutes | 2.5 (±1.0) | 4.7(±5.0) | 3.7 (±4.9) | – |
| PTA, minutes | 7.1 (±11.3) | 28.3 (±54.1) | 21.9 (±43.8) | – |
| GCS score | 15.0 (±0.0) | 15.0 (±0.0) | 15.0 (±0.0) | – |
| Mean duration to DTI (months) | 3.9 (±5.2) | 7.5 (±7.3) | 6.5 (±6.7) | – |
Values represent mean (±standard deviation); ESS, Epworth Sleepiness Scale; LOC, loss of consciousness; PTA, post-traumatic amnesia; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; DTI, diffusion tensor imaging.
significantly different of Epworth Sleepiness Scale between subgroups A and B at p < 0.05.
Comparison of diffusion tensor imaging parameters of the patient and control groups.
| Patient group | 0.40 (±0.04) | 350.26 (±168.93) | 0.36 (±0.04) | 189.34 (±138.11) | 0.35 (±0.03) | 20354.54 (±5958.37) |
| Control group | 0.41 (±0.03) | 375.58 (±152.75) | 0.39 (±0.42) | 323.23 (±120.80) | 0.36 (±0.01) | 19340.92 (±5559.88) |
| 0.127 | 0.441 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.104 | 0.388 | |
Values represent mean (±standard deviation); ARAS, ascending reticular activating system; FA, fractional anisotropy; TV, tract volume.
significant differences between the patient and control groups at p < 0.05.
Comparison of diffusion tensor imaging parameters of the subgroups A and B.
| Subgroup A | 0.41 (±0.05) | 330 (±165.70) | 0.36 (±0.04) | 262 (±147.55) | 0.35 (±0.02) | 19725.61 (±3852.02) |
| Subgroup B | 0.39 (±0.04) | 363.29 (±172.64) | 0.36 (±0.04) | 132.48 (±100.79) | 0.35 (±0.03) | 20758.85 (±7028.13) |
| 0.127 | 0.441 | 0.836 | 0.003 | 0.899 | 0.524 | |
Values represent mean (±standard deviation); ARAS, ascending reticular activating system; FA, fractional anisotropy; TV, tract volume.
significant differences between the subgroup A and B at p < 0.05.
Figure 1Brain MR images and diffusion tensor tractography of the three components of ascending reticular activating system, in a representative patient and control subject. (A) T2-weighted brain MR images at the time of diffusion tensor imaging scanning in a patient with subgroup A (50-year old male) and subgroup B(35-year old male), and a control subject (63-year old female) show no abnormality. (B) Results of diffusion tensor tractography (DTT) for the lower dorsal ascending reticular activating system (ARAS). (C) Results of DTT for the lower ventral ARAS: the lower ventral ARAS in the patient with subgroup B is narrowed in the patient on both sides (arrows), compared with those of the control subject. (D) Results of DTT for the upper ARAS.